Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Journal of Innovative and Creativity Journal of Law and Social Politics
Rahayudin, Rahayudin
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Hukum dalam Pengelolaan Dana Desa Berdasarkan Regulasi Desa Hakim, Abdul; Syamsuri, Yogi Fuji; Saepudin, Bandi; Rahayudin, Rahayudin
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.5517

Abstract

Village Fund Management is an important instrument in realizing participatory, transparent, and sustainable village development. However, in the practice of managing village funds, various legal issues often arise, especially those related to the accountability of Village Apparatus in financial planning, implementation, and reporting. This article aims to analyze the Aspects of Legal Accountability in Village Fund Management Based on the Village Regulatory Framework, including Law Number 6 of 2014 concerning Villages, Government Regulation Number 43 of 2014 in conjunction with Government Regulation Number 47 of 2015, and the Regulation of the Minister of Villages, Disadvantaged Regions and Transmigration regarding village financial management. The approach used is normative juridical with a focus on the analysis of laws and regulations, the principles of state administrative law, and the concept of state financial accountability. The study results indicate that the legal accountability of village officials consists of administrative accountability, financial accountability, and criminal liability for irregularities or state losses. Weaknesses in apparatus capacity, minimal internal oversight, and inaccurate reporting documentation are the main factors causing these irregularities. This article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the legal capacity of village officials, optimizing a multi-level oversight system, and implementing accountability principles to achieve good, transparent, and violation-free Village Fund governance.
Blockchain-Based Evidence Legality in Indonesia's Criminal Justice System Naseer, Muchammad; Gusdevi, Harya; Rahayudin, Rahayudin; Guterres, Antonio
Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jhi.v5i1.2351

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legality of blockchain-based digital evidence in criminal justice processes in Indonesia, emphasizing two main focuses: the possibility of its admissibility as valid evidence and the identification of accompanying normative, technical, and procedural limitations. This study uses a normative juridical method through a legislative approach (the ITE Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, the Criminal Procedure Code, and Supreme Court Regulations), a conceptual approach (the concept of digital evidence, blockchain technology, and audit trails), a comparative approach (comparison of practices in several other jurisdictions), and a case approach through analysis of court decisions relating to electronic evidence. The results show that blockchain technology has significant potential to be recognized as evidence with strong probative value due to its characteristics of immutability, transparency, and traceability. However, this study also identifies several challenges, including the lack of specific regulations in the Criminal Procedure Code, potential conflicts with the principle of personal data protection, the absence of uniform digital audit trail standards, the heterogeneity of blockchain systems, and the limited technical capacity of law enforcement officials. These findings underscore the urgency of regulatory reform, standardization of evidentiary procedures, and strengthening the technical competence of law enforcement officials so that blockchain-based evidence can be implemented effectively and accountably in criminal proceedings. Practically, the results of this study provide a basis for policymakers to formulate a legal framework and technical policies that adapt to the use of blockchain technology in the criminal evidence system without neglecting the principles of human rights protection and legal certainty. Overall, this study contributes conceptually and normatively to the integration of blockchain technology into the Indonesian criminal justice system.
Digital Sovereignty and The Right To Data: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, The European Union, and The United States Rahayudin, Rahayudin; Naseer, Muchammad; Agustina, Nova; Guterres, Antonio
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jlsp.v3i2.71

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the principles of data sovereignty and the right to personal data in Indonesia, the European Union, and the United States, and assess their impact on national policies and their legal implications. The study uses a comparative juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach, utilizing the Statute Approach to examine relevant laws and regulations, the Comparative Approach to compare the implementation of digital sovereignty principles across jurisdictions, and the Conceptual Approach to examine the theoretical framework and concepts related to data rights and digital sovereignty. The research findings indicate that Indonesia emphasizes local data control and obligations of electronic system providers, the European Union implements data subject rights and strict oversight through the GDPR, while the United States is more flexible with sectoral regulations that emphasize private sector innovation. These differences in principles influence national policies, with Indonesia facing challenges in harmonization and implementation, the European Union demonstrating regulatory uniformity, and the United States offering flexibility but with varying data protection. The legal implications of this study emphasize the importance of improving oversight capacity, regulatory harmonization, and secure cross-border data transfer mechanisms, while providing a basis for policy recommendations for Indonesia in strengthening digital sovereignty and the right to personal data.
Co-Authors Abdul Hakim Agustina, Nova Gusdevi, Harya Guterres, Antonio Muchammad Naseer Saepudin, Bandi Syamsuri, Yogi Fuji