Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Priviet Social Sciences Journal Authentica
Auliya Rochman
Universitas Tanjungpura
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL POSITION OF PAYLATER AS A PAYMENT METHOD IN INDONESIA David Banjarnahor; Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha Naridha; Tengku Andrias Prayudha; Sy. Muhamamad Ikhsan; Auliya Rochman
Authentica: Private Law Journal Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Vol 8 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/aplj.v8i2.17343

Abstract

This study examines the perspective of the juridical status of the implementation of the payment system and its legality dimension in social practice using the statute approach and conceptual approach methodology. To examine the problem of this research method, it uses normative juridical by using a conceptual approach to review and study the research topics raised. The findings indicate that the increasing adoption of payout immediately raises new complexities in users' understanding of rights and obligations in digital contracts. Regulatory uncertainty makes consumers vulnerable to debt traps due to the consequences of late payments, and the risk of personal data leakage increases as the use of pay later services is not equipped with adequate data protection. It is time for Bank Indonesia and the Financial Services Authority to be clearer in identifying concrete steps to improve financial literacy and consumer supervision in line with the development of increasingly developing and innovative pay laters. Based on a comprehensive analysis, it can be concluded that the legal position of the payout mechanism is equivalent to traditional credit agreements in general.
The regulator’s dilemma in proving algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital economy era Tengku Andrias Prayudha; David Banjarnahor; Auliya Rochman; Sy. Muhammad Ikhsan; Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1064

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy, marked by the adoption of pricing algorithms, has introduced new dynamics to Indonesia's competition law landscape. Algorithmic systems enable autonomous price setting based on market data learning without direct human intervention. This condition potentially gives rise to algorithmic cartels, a form of market coordination occurring without explicit agreement, yet producing anti-competitive effects similar to conventional cartels. The national legal framework, specifically Law No. 5 of 1999 and KPPU Regulation No. 4 of 2010, remains inadequate to address this phenomenon, as it is still anchored to a traditional paradigm requiring the element of “agreement” as a prerequisite for proving violation. This study aims to analyze the dilemma faced by the regulator (KPPU) in proving the existence of algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital era. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study examines relevant legislation, academic literature, and international policies from the OECD and European Commission. The findings indicate a regulatory gap in Indonesia's competition law regarding proof involving autonomous systems. Furthermore, the KPPU faces conceptual and technical obstacles in determining legal intent (legal intent) and the validity of digital evidence derived from algorithmic systems. The study concludes that proving algorithmic cartels must shift from an intent-based approach to an effects-based approach, which focuses on assessing the economic impact on market structure and consumer welfare. Therefore, strategic recommendations include reinterpreting the element of “agreement” in Article 1, paragraph 7, and Article 11 of Law No. 5 of 1999 to encompass algorithmic coordination that generates anti-competitive effects. Additionally, the KPPU is mandated to develop digital evidence guidelines and strengthen the multidisciplinary institutional capacity to effectively oversee algorithmic behavior. These steps are crucial for Indonesian competition law to adapt to the realities of the digital economy while ensuring justice and legal certainty.
Phubbing in Social Interaction: A Phenomenological Study on the Urban Young Generation in Pontianak Zulkarnain; Muhammad Sadikin; Auliya Rochman
International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) (Special Issue) - International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Palu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56338/ijhess.v7i2.7593

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technology has significantly changed the pattern of social interaction, especially among urban youth. One form of this transformation is "phubbing". It is a behavior in which individuals ignore others who are physically present because they are too focused on the smartphone. This study aims to understand "phubbing" as a new cultural pattern in the social interaction of urban youth in Pontianak. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, this study involved ten informants aged 18-25 years who actively used smartphones and had experienced phubbing, both as perpetrators and recipients. The results of the study show that phubbing has become socially normalized and integrated into everyday life, reflecting shifts in social values and norms of interaction. Although it is often considered a routine, phubbing also creates the ambivalence of being accepted and hated. This study shows that phubbing is more than just a digital habit but is also a cultural practice that redefines presence, attention, and social relationships in the digital age.
Konstruksi Hukum Rahasia Dagang Berbasis Tacit Knowledge di Tengah Mobilitas Barista Coffee Shop Sy. Muhammad Ikhsan; Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha; David Banjarnahor; Auliya Rochman; Tengku Andrias Prayudha
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 5 No 7 (2026): July
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v5i7.1110

Abstract

Pertumbuhan coffee shop di Kota Pontianak yang telah mencapai lebih dari seribu unit usaha mendorong tingginya mobilitas barista antarkedai kopi, sebuah fenomena yang berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa rahasia dagang atas resep, teknik racikan, dan standar operasional prosedur yang bersifat tidak terdokumentasi (tacit knowledge). Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan hukum tacit knowledge dalam rezim rahasia dagang Indonesia serta merumuskan konstruksi hukum yang ideal untuk melindunginya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 tentang Rahasia Dagang secara normatif telah mengakomodasi informasi tidak terdokumentasi sepanjang memenuhi unsur kerahasiaan, nilai ekonomi, dan upaya menjaga kerahasiaan, namun penerapannya pada UMKM coffee shop menghadapi kendala pembuktian karena minimnya dokumentasi tertulis dan ketiadaan perjanjian kerahasiaan formal. Perbandingan dengan Trade Secrets Directive Uni Eropa dan Defend Trade Secrets Act Amerika Serikat menunjukkan pentingnya keseimbangan antara perlindungan rahasia dagang dan mobilitas tenaga kerja. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan klausul kerahasiaan yang proporsional serta dokumentasi minimal bagi pelaku UMKM coffee shop.
Co-Authors Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha Naridha David Banjarnahor Muhammad Sadikin Sy. Muhamamad Ikhsan Sy. Muhammad Ikhsan Tengku Andrias Prayudha Zulkarnain Zulkarnain