Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.197
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin (JUKIM) Priviet Social Sciences Journal Journal of Innovative and Creativity Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Authentica
David Banjarnahor
Universitas Tanjungpura
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
LEGAL POSITION OF PAYLATER AS A PAYMENT METHOD IN INDONESIA David Banjarnahor; Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha Naridha; Tengku Andrias Prayudha; Sy. Muhamamad Ikhsan; Auliya Rochman
Authentica: Private Law Journal Vol 8 No 2 (2025): Vol 8 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/aplj.v8i2.17343

Abstract

This study examines the perspective of the juridical status of the implementation of the payment system and its legality dimension in social practice using the statute approach and conceptual approach methodology. To examine the problem of this research method, it uses normative juridical by using a conceptual approach to review and study the research topics raised. The findings indicate that the increasing adoption of payout immediately raises new complexities in users' understanding of rights and obligations in digital contracts. Regulatory uncertainty makes consumers vulnerable to debt traps due to the consequences of late payments, and the risk of personal data leakage increases as the use of pay later services is not equipped with adequate data protection. It is time for Bank Indonesia and the Financial Services Authority to be clearer in identifying concrete steps to improve financial literacy and consumer supervision in line with the development of increasingly developing and innovative pay laters. Based on a comprehensive analysis, it can be concluded that the legal position of the payout mechanism is equivalent to traditional credit agreements in general.
Kajian Yuridis Alih Fungsi Mobil Pribadi Dan Angkutan Umum Menjadi Usaha Bergerak: Implikasi Terhadap Hukum Transportasi Di Kota Pontianak Ismawartati; David Banjarnahor; Tanti Anjelica; Nur Hashima Trisna Wati
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v6i1.7318

Abstract

Kajian ini membahas dengan mendalam fenomena alih fungsi mobil pribadi dan angkutan umum menjadi usaha bergerak di Kota Pontianak, yang muncul sebagai respons adaptif masyarakat terhadap keterbatasan angkutan umum dan tekanan kebutuhan ekonomi. Penelitian ini mengungkapkan dampak hukum yang signifikan dari praktik tersebut terhadap pelaksanaan hukum transportasi, terutama terkait pengawasan, penegakan aturan serta ketertiban lalu lintas. Ketidaksesuaian fungsi kendaraan dengan dokumen resmi dan proses perizinan yang kompleks menimbulkan tantangan pengelolaan yang memerlukan sinergi kuat antara Pemerintah Daerah, Dinas Perhubungan, Kepolisian dan Organisasi Angkutan Darat. Kajian ini turut menegaskan pentingnya penguatan aspek hukum dan administratif serta edukasi masyarakat agar alih fungsi kendaraan dapat berjalan secara legal dan terkontrol, demi menjaga integritas sistem transportasi yang aman, tertib dan berkelanjutan. Metode yuridis empiris menujukkan bahwa keberhasilan pengelolaan alih fungsi kendaraan bergantung pada konsistensi penegakan hukum dan kolaborasi lintas lembaga yang efektif. Dalam konteks pembangunan transportasi Kota Pontianak, regulasi yang adaptif dan pengawasan intensif menjadi kunci untuk memberikan kepastian hukum bagi masyarakat sekaligus mendukung kelancaran pelayanan angkutan umum. Dengan demikian kajian ini memberikan kontribusi penting dalam memperjelas cakupan regulasi dan implkasi huku yang harus diperhatikan dalam sistem transportasi perkotaan yang dinamis sekaligus menjadi landasan bagi pengambilan kebijakan yang lebih responsif terhadap kebutuhan aktual masyarakat.
The regulator’s dilemma in proving algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital economy era Tengku Andrias Prayudha; David Banjarnahor; Auliya Rochman; Sy. Muhammad Ikhsan; Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1064

Abstract

The rapid development of the digital economy, marked by the adoption of pricing algorithms, has introduced new dynamics to Indonesia's competition law landscape. Algorithmic systems enable autonomous price setting based on market data learning without direct human intervention. This condition potentially gives rise to algorithmic cartels, a form of market coordination occurring without explicit agreement, yet producing anti-competitive effects similar to conventional cartels. The national legal framework, specifically Law No. 5 of 1999 and KPPU Regulation No. 4 of 2010, remains inadequate to address this phenomenon, as it is still anchored to a traditional paradigm requiring the element of “agreement” as a prerequisite for proving violation. This study aims to analyze the dilemma faced by the regulator (KPPU) in proving the existence of algorithmic cartels against the principle of fair competition in the digital era. Employing a normative juridical approach, this study examines relevant legislation, academic literature, and international policies from the OECD and European Commission. The findings indicate a regulatory gap in Indonesia's competition law regarding proof involving autonomous systems. Furthermore, the KPPU faces conceptual and technical obstacles in determining legal intent (legal intent) and the validity of digital evidence derived from algorithmic systems. The study concludes that proving algorithmic cartels must shift from an intent-based approach to an effects-based approach, which focuses on assessing the economic impact on market structure and consumer welfare. Therefore, strategic recommendations include reinterpreting the element of “agreement” in Article 1, paragraph 7, and Article 11 of Law No. 5 of 1999 to encompass algorithmic coordination that generates anti-competitive effects. Additionally, the KPPU is mandated to develop digital evidence guidelines and strengthen the multidisciplinary institutional capacity to effectively oversee algorithmic behavior. These steps are crucial for Indonesian competition law to adapt to the realities of the digital economy while ensuring justice and legal certainty.
A Critical Review of the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries from the Perspective of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy Daulat Nathanael Banjarnahor; Rengga Kusuma Putra; Firinta Togatorop; David Banjarnahor
Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 04 (2025): Juli: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Muda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56127/jukim.v4i04.2166

Abstract

As a country with a constitution as the highest fundamental law, Indonesia regulates and distributes state functions to state power organs, which are then referred to as State Institutions. One of the state institutions regulated in the constitution is the State Ministry Institution, which is governed by Article 17 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, stating that the President is assisted by State Ministers. Article 17 paragraph (4) regulates that the establishment, amendment, and dissolution of state ministries are governed by law. This then became a polemic, because the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) of the Republic of Indonesia had agreed to the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries, with one of the important points of change being the absence of a limit on the number of ministries, so that the number of ministries formed and established by the President is in accordance with the needs of state administration. The issues raised in this scientific article are: First, How to Critically Review and Analyze the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries from the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy, and Second, Whether the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries is in accordance with the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy. The research method used to address the issues in this scientific article is the normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. The conclusion drawn from the problem-solving answers is: First, that the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila were not used as guidelines and were ignored by the State in the process of Revising Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries, and Second, that the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries does not yet align with the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy.
Telaah Konstitusionalitas Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) dan Koperasi Desa Merah Putih (KDMP) Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Indonesia, Asas Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, dan Prinsip Good Governance Daulat Nathanael Banjarnahor; Firinta Togatorop; David Banjarnahor
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.430

Abstract

Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) dan Koperasi Desa Merah Putih (KDMP) merupakan kebijakan prioritas nasional pemerintah periode 2024–2029 untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan sosial dan memperkuat ekonomi kerakyatan. Namun, regulasi melalui Perpres Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang Badan Gizi Nasional dan Permenkop UKM Nomor 3 Tahun 2025 menimbulkan persoalan ketatanegaraan. Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji kesesuaiannya dengan prinsip Negara Hukum Indonesia, asas ketatanegaraan, Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik (AAUPB), prinsip good governance, serta dampaknya terhadap otonomi desa. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan historis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa MBG memiliki dasar konstitusional yang kuat berdasarkan Pasal 28H dan 34 UUD NRI 1945, tetapi desain kelembagaannya belum mencerminkan asas desentralisasi dan subsidiaritas. Sementara itu, KDMP yang dibentuk secara top-down bertentangan dengan prinsip koperasi berbasis keanggotaan sukarela menurut Pasal 33 ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945 dan Undang-Undang Perkoperasian, serta berpotensi melemahkan otonomi desa. Dari aspek administrasi, kedua program juga belum sepenuhnya memenuhi AAUPB, terutama asas kepastian hukum, partisipasi, keterbukaan, dan larangan penyalahgunaan wewenang. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya perbaikan desain kebijakan agar sejalan dengan prinsip negara hukum yang desentralistis dan partisipatif.
Konstruksi Hukum Rahasia Dagang Berbasis Tacit Knowledge di Tengah Mobilitas Barista Coffee Shop Sy. Muhammad Ikhsan; Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha; David Banjarnahor; Auliya Rochman; Tengku Andrias Prayudha
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 5 No 7 (2026): July
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v5i7.1110

Abstract

Pertumbuhan coffee shop di Kota Pontianak yang telah mencapai lebih dari seribu unit usaha mendorong tingginya mobilitas barista antarkedai kopi, sebuah fenomena yang berpotensi menimbulkan sengketa rahasia dagang atas resep, teknik racikan, dan standar operasional prosedur yang bersifat tidak terdokumentasi (tacit knowledge). Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan hukum tacit knowledge dalam rezim rahasia dagang Indonesia serta merumuskan konstruksi hukum yang ideal untuk melindunginya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2000 tentang Rahasia Dagang secara normatif telah mengakomodasi informasi tidak terdokumentasi sepanjang memenuhi unsur kerahasiaan, nilai ekonomi, dan upaya menjaga kerahasiaan, namun penerapannya pada UMKM coffee shop menghadapi kendala pembuktian karena minimnya dokumentasi tertulis dan ketiadaan perjanjian kerahasiaan formal. Perbandingan dengan Trade Secrets Directive Uni Eropa dan Defend Trade Secrets Act Amerika Serikat menunjukkan pentingnya keseimbangan antara perlindungan rahasia dagang dan mobilitas tenaga kerja. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan klausul kerahasiaan yang proporsional serta dokumentasi minimal bagi pelaku UMKM coffee shop.
Strategi Edukasi Literasi Finansial Digital Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan  Pinjaman Online Ilegal pada Kelompok Rentan Henry Anderson Parapat; Ervin Riandy; David Banjarnahor; Farahadayune Naharani Poetry
KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/nsyanh35

Abstract

Maraknya pinjaman online ilegal di Indonesia menuntut peningkatan literasi finansial digital, khususnya pada mahasiswa yang rentan terhadap praktik predatory lending. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan meningkatkan pemahaman mahasiswa mengenai bahaya pinjaman online ilegal melalui edukasi digital berbasis e-book berjudul panduan praktis menghindari pinjaman online ilegal. Metode pelaksanaan menggunakan pendekatan partisipatif dengan distribusi materi melalui google drive dan evaluasi melalui google form pada mahasiswa. Hasil pra kuesioner menunjukkan 65,8% responden pernah menerima tawaran pinjaman online dengan media sosial sebagai saluran dominan. Kemampuan mengecek legalitas layanan hanya 47,4% sebelum edukasi. Setelah intervensi edukasi, terjadi peningkatan. Responden menyatakan memahami dalam membedakan pinjaman legal atau ilegal, memahami risiko penyalahgunaan data pribadi, dan lebih selektif terhadap tawaran dana cepat. Perubahan perilaku juga terlihat dari penghapusan aplikasi tidak terdaftar OJK. Edukasi berbasis media digital yang sederhana terbukti cukup efektif dalam meningkatkan literasi finansial digital. Namun, pendampingan berkelanjutan diperlukan mengingat masih terdapat responden yang menganggap pinjaman online pada umumnya sebagai solusi praktis. Kegiatan ini berpotensi dikembangkan untuk kelompok masyarakat lain sebagai upaya preventif kejahatan finansial digital.
Co-Authors Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha Alifah Nur Fitriana Naridha Naridha Auliya Rochman DAULAT NATHANAEL BANJARNAHOR Ervin Riandy Farahadayune Naharani Poetry Firinta Togatorop Henry Anderson Parapat Ismawartati Nur Hashima Trisna Wati Rengga Kusuma Putra Sy. Muhamamad Ikhsan Sy. Muhammad Ikhsan Tanti Anjelica Tengku Andrias Prayudha