Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Mimbar Keadilan MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review At-Tafakur: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Ar-Risalah: Media Ke-Islaman, Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam
Syabbul Bachri
Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang, Indonesia
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Kesepakatan Perdamaian Yang Tidak Dicantumkan Dalam Amar Putusan Perceraian: Studi Putusan Nomor 770/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sit Muhammad Muzaki; Risma Nur Arifah; Syabbul Bachri
At-Tafakur: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Az-Zain Sampang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Mediasi merupakan bagian integral dari proses penyelesaian perkara perceraian di pengadilan sebagaimana diatur dalam PERMA No. 1 Tahun 2016. Pasal 30 ayat (3) menyatakan bahwa apabila mediasi mencapai kesepakatan sebagian atas objek perkara atau tuntutan hukum, hakim pemeriksa perkara wajib mencantumkan kesepakatan tersebut dalam pertimbangan dan amar putusan. Namun, dalam Putusan No. 770/Pdt.G/2024/PA.Sit, meskipun mediasi dinyatakan berhasil sebagian, kesepakatan yang dicapai tidak dimuat dalam amar putusan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan kesepakatan perdamaian menurut ketentuan PERMA No.1 Tahun 2016 serta mengkaji akibat hukumnya apabila tidak dicantumkan dalam amar putusan. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, melalui studi terhadap putusan dimaksud. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak dicantumkannya hasil kesepakatan perdamaian sebagian merupakan bentuk pelanggaran prosedural yang dapat menimbulkan cacat formil, ketidakpastian hukum, dan melemahkan kekuatan eksekutorial dari kesepakatan yang telah tercapai. Kondisi ini mencerminkan adanya ketidaksesuaian antara norma hukum dan praktik peradilan. Berdasarkan teori kepastian hukum yang dikemukakan oleh Gustav Radbruch, Sudikno Mertokusumo, dan Van Apeldoorn, pencantuman hasil mediasi dalam amar putusan merupakan langkah esensial untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak para pihak dalam penyelesaian sengketa secara damai.
COMPARING ISLAMIC MODELS OF SUBSTITUTE HEIRS: KHI, HAZAIRIN, SHAHRUR, AND SHIA PERSPECTIVES Abdul Haris; Syabbul Bachri
Ar-Risalah Media Keislaman Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam Vol. 23 No. 2 (2025): (Oktober 2025)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Islam Ibrahimy Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.69552/kf4xqr67

Abstract

Although the concept of substitute heirs in the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) adopts the inheritance principles of Hazairin's thought, there are notable differences between the two. On the other hand, there is an assumption that the substitute heir system is a new legal framework that has never existed before. However, upon further examination, there are several models of substitute heir systems within the Islamic tradition. This study aims to analyze and compare the substitute heir models conceptualized by the KHI, Hazairin, Shahrur, and Shia schools of thought. This research is a library study employing a qualitative approach with a descriptive-comparative analysis method. The findings reveal that while all models recognize substitute heirs as a vital mechanism to ensure justice in inheritance distribution, significant differences exist in their principles, legal foundations, and heir hierarchies. The KHI limits the portion of substitute heirs so as not to exceed the portion of heirs of the same degree, whereas Hazairin provides full rights without proportional restrictions. Shahrur offers a progressive concept (tardliyah), emphasizing the equalization of grandchildren with children and flexible distribution based on his hudud theory. In contrast, the Shia school employs an exclusive hierarchical system that prioritizes closer relatives and applies the per stirpes distribution method. This study highlights the unique contributions of each model to the discourse on Islamic inheritance law reform and provides insights to address the evolving needs of families and society.
Presidential Threshold in The Election of The President and Vice President from A Constitution and Human Rights Perspective Imam Sukadi; Jundiani Jundiani; Syabbul Bachri; Mohamad Sinal; Ahmad Qiram As-Suvi
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Agustus 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v17i2.10320

Abstract

Art 222 Law Number 7 year 2017 concerning General Elections, regulates the provisions of the threshold where the acquisition of seats in the DPR must be 20 percent or obtain valid votes nationally as much as 25 percent then political parties can nominate and nominate pairs of presidential and vice-presidential candidates. Setting the Presidential Threshold in the election of President and Vice President in Indonesia from a constitutional and human rights perspective brings its own problems in the Indonesian constitutional system. The Presidential Threshold system does give rise to privileges for certain parties. This is because only parties that meet the threshold can compete directly in the presidential election. It is for this reason that the privileges of these major parties have given birth to political cartels. What is bad for democracy is that it eliminates equal competition for all potential candidates to contest the Presidential election. The Presidential Threshold is not justified in eliminating or emasculating the meaning of democracy which provides rights and freedoms for citizens. Among the constitutional rights include the right to vote, the right to nominate (the right to be a candidate), and the right to nominate candidates, these are rights guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which everything is reduced because of this Presidential Threshold provision.
A Benefit-Based Reconstruction of Contemporary Copyright Inheritance in Indonesian Islamic Law Syabbul Bachri; Zaenul Mahmudi; Khoirul Hidayah; Ma'adul Yaqien Makkarateng
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): MilRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v5i2.13719

Abstract

The emergence of intellectual property as an economically productive asset has challenged the traditional conception of inheritance in Islamic law, particularly regarding the transfer of copyright after the author's death. Although the Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) serves as the primary legal framework for inheritance adjudication in Indonesia's Religious Courts, its provisions remain predominantly oriented toward tangible property, generating normative uncertainty regarding contemporary intangible assets. This study aims to examine the legal status of copyright inheritance within Indonesian Islamic law through the case of the copyrighted Al-Barqy Qur'anic learning method and to formulate a benefit-based reconstruction of inheritance norms capable of accommodating productive intellectual assets. Employing an empirical socio-legal approach, the research integrates qualitative fieldwork through semi-structured interviews with the heirs responsible for managing the Al-Barqy copyright and doctrinal analysis of Articles 171(e) and 189 of the KHI in conjunction with Indonesian copyright legislation. The collected data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, while the normative reconstruction was developed through Fazlur Rahman's Double Movement theory and Jeremy Bentham's utilitarianism. The findings demonstrate that the heirs have implemented a hybrid inheritance model combining farā'iḍ-based allocation of economic rights with collective copyright governance, thereby preserving both Islamic distributive justice and the long-term economic productivity of the inherited asset. Nevertheless, the absence of explicit legal recognition within the KHI creates uncertainty regarding the inheritance and management of productive intangible property. This study proposes a benefit-based reconstruction of Islamic inheritance law by reformulating Article 171(e) to recognize intangible economic rights as inheritable assets explicitly, and by reconstructing Article 189 to expand the concept of productive inheritance beyond agricultural land to encompass all assets requiring collective and sustainable management. The study contributes to contemporary Islamic inheritance scholarship by demonstrating the adaptive capacity of Islamic law to respond to evolving economic realities while maintaining its foundational objectives of justice, legal certainty, and public welfare.
Co-Authors Abdul Haris Ahmad Qiram As-Suvi Imam Sukadi Jundiani Jundiani Khoirul Hidayah Ma'adul Yaqien Makkarateng Mohamad Sinal Muhammad Muzaki Risma Nur Arifah Zaenul mahmudi