Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Tantangan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi oleh Perusahaan Multinasional Dwight Nusawakan; Abdul Malik Mufty; Muh Anugrah Kurniawan Amir
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6303

Abstract

The phenomenon of transnational corruption involving foreign corporate entities poses significant challenges to the national criminal justice system, particularly in asserting jurisdiction and enforcing sanctions. Although legal frameworks such as the 2023 Indonesian Penal Code, the Law on the Eradication of Corruption, the Law on the Corruption Eradication Commission, and the Law on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters are already in place, the prosecution of multinational corporations remains hindered by structural barriers and implementation gaps. This research aims to analyze the legal challenges faced by Indonesia in prosecuting foreign corporations engaged in corruption and to formulate appropriate legal strategies to address these obstacles. The research method employed is normative legal research using statute and conceptual approaches, drawing on primary legal materials (statutory regulations), as well as secondary and tertiary legal sources. The findings reveal the urgent need for enforcement reforms through jurisdictional innovation, strengthened international cooperation, and the adoption of progressive legal theory and developmental law approaches to ensure legal certainty and effectiveness in addressing global corporate crime.
Reformulating Corporate Criminal Liability for Environmental Damage through Restoration-Oriented Sanctions and Compliance Mechanisms in Indonesia Framework Fajar Dian Aryani; Abdul Malik Mufty
Kosmik Hukum Vol. 26 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30595/kosmikhukum.v26i2.29514

Abstract

Environmental degradation in Indonesia is increasingly driven by corporate activities, yet corporate criminal liability remains ineffective in delivering deterrence and ecological recovery. This reflects a structural gap between the normative objectives of environmental protection and enforcement outcomes, primarily due to fragmented liability standards and the dominance of fine-centered sanctions. This study aims to reformulate corporate criminal liability by integrating restoration-oriented sanctions and corporate compliance mechanisms into a coherent framework. Using normative doctrinal legal research, this study analyzes statutory regulations, legal principles, and comparative practices to identify structural deficiencies and construct prescriptive arguments. The findings reveal that the existing framework produces largely symbolic enforcement, characterized by limited attribution of corporate responsibility and the absence of mandatory restoration obligations. Financial penalties alone fail to deter misconduct or remedy environmental harm. This study argues that restoration-oriented sanctions reorient criminal punishment toward ecological recovery, while compliance mechanisms embed preventive accountability within corporate governance. The originality lies in advancing an integrated liability model that positions restoration and compliance as core elements of corporate criminal responsibility, contributing to an outcome-oriented approach to environmental criminal law and offering concrete directions for strengthening environmental governance in Indonesia.
Implikasi Hukum Pidana Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Dana Zakat Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ihat Subihat; Hamidah Abdurrachman; Abdul Malik Mufty
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6141

Abstract

The misuse of zakat funds for criminal acts of corruption represents a significant challenge in Indonesia, a country with the largest Muslim population in the world. Zakat, as one of the pillars of Islam, plays a crucial role in wealth redistribution, poverty alleviation, and social justice. The research employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing library research and qualitative analysis to explore the legal framework, challenges in law enforcement, and the socio-economic impacts of zakat fund corruption.The findings reveal that misuse of zakat funds, through embezzlement, budget mark-ups, and program diversion, not only violates positive law but also contravenes Islamic sharia principles. The study highlights the detrimental effects of such corruption on public trust, social solidarity, and the economic empowerment of mustahik (zakat recipients). Furthermore, it underscores the long-term consequences, including increased poverty, social inequality, and hindered economic development.
Model Investasi Berbasis Ekuitas Adat: Studi Kewajiban Kemitraan (Joint Venture) Investor dan Masyarakat Adat Port Numbay di Kota Jayapura Dudi Mulyadi; Firman Firman; Tri Yanuaria; Abdul Malik Mufty
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JHPIS)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v5i3.6648

Abstract

This study examines a customary equity-based investment model as an alternative legal framework for partnerships between investors and the Port Numbay Indigenous Community in Jayapura City. It addresses the persistent inequality in investment practices, where customary land is generally treated only as an object of compensation rather than as an equity asset capable of providing sustainable economic benefits to indigenous communities. Using a normative-empirical (socio-legal) approach, the research analyzes statutory regulations, Papua’s Special Autonomy framework, customary land practices, and empirical data collected through interviews with customary leaders, clan representatives, and business actors. Qualitative analysis was conducted using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches. The findings indicate that existing investment arrangements rely mainly on one-time compensation, which provides limited legal certainty, economic sustainability, and community participation. The proposed model redefines indigenous communities as equity partners with proportional ownership, dividend rights, and participation in investment governance, based on the principles of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC), equitable benefit-sharing, and legal protection. This model offers a practical legal framework for promoting fair, inclusive, and sustainable investment in Papua.