Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Dea Puspitasari
UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hukum Lingkungan dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan: Kritik atas Proyek Strategis Nasional yang Berimplikasi Pada Degradasi Ekosistem Azmi Fauziah; Dalva Aulia Apandi; Dea Puspitasari; Mudthia Nabila Maulud
Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Riau, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis dampak Proyek Strategis Nasional (PSN) terhadap degradasi ekosistem dan masyarakat di Indonesia. Meskipun PSN bertujuan mempercepat pertumbuhan ekonomi, implementasinya seringkali mengabaikan aspek perlindungan lingkungan. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menemukan adanya kesenjangan besar antara kerangka hukum lingkungan yang ada dengan realita di lapangan. Instrumen seperti AMDAL seringkali hanya dianggap sebagai formalitas administratif, sementara partisipasi publik dan penegakan hukum masih lemah. Hal ini memicu konflik agraria dan ketidakadilan ekologis. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan reformasi hukum yang menekankan prinsip pembangunan berkelanjutan, transparansi, serta penegakan hukum yang konsisten agar PSN tidak hanya mengejar target ekonomi tetapi juga menjamin keadilan sosial dan kelestarian lingkungan.
The Effectiveness of Administrative Dispute Resolution Through the Administrative Court and the Ombudsman in Administrative Disputes Dea Puspitasari; Restu Ramania; Santana Suryapringgana; Teguh Abdurrohman Shodiq; Taufiq Alamsyah
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): : May: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/bvt2z498

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of administrative dispute resolution through the State Administrative Court (PTUN) and the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia within Indonesia’s administrative law system. It employs a normative-doctrinal legal research design supported by comparative analysis of statutory instruments, doctrinal literature, and institutional frameworks governing administrative justice. The findings indicate a structural dichotomy between PTUN as a judicial body producing binding decisions and the Ombudsman as a supervisory institution issuing non-binding recommendations. This divergence generates an enforcement gap, particularly in the execution of PTUN judgments and the voluntary nature of Ombudsman compliance. The study further reveals fragmented coordination between both institutions, despite overlapping jurisdictional objects in administrative disputes. Such fragmentation reduces the overall effectiveness of administrative justice in ensuring legal certainty, accessibility, and substantive fairness. The research concludes that neither mechanism independently achieves optimal effectiveness without institutional integration. Strengthening normative harmonization, improving enforcement mechanisms, and clarifying procedural linkages are necessary to enhance system performance and public legal protection. The study contributes to administrative law discourse by proposing a conceptual framework for integrated administrative justice combining adjudicative and supervisory functions.  
Legal Protection for Trademarks That Are Substantially Similar in Business Practice in Indonesia Azmi Fauziah Suanda; Dea Puspitasari; Mudhtia Nabila Maulud; Ikhwan Aulia Fatahillah
Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studies Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): :February: Sapientia Diversalis: Journal of Human Interaction and Social Studie
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/xyv4r954

Abstract

This study examines the systematic vulnerabilities embedded within the Indonesian first to file trademark registration framework under Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. Utilizing a qualitative normative juridical research design, the investigation evaluates the persistent misalignment between statutory mandates, administrative examinations, and judicial outcomes. The analysis shows that the absence of standardized testing metrics for the triple identity test generates severe subjectivity during the evaluation of dominant visual, phonetic, and conceptual elements. Furthermore, comparative case studies of landmark litigations expose deep inconsistencies in how commercial courts interpret bad faith intentions and cosmetic brand modifications. These institutional challenges are exacerbated by the rapid growth of the digital marketplace, which enables sophisticated lookalike storefronts to exploit existing legal voids and dilute corporate goodwill. The study concludes that building a secure and innovative domestic market ecosystem requires urgent structural reforms, including automated phonetic mapping technologies, standardized judicial evaluation guidelines, and inclusive registration pathways.  
Co-Authors Azmi Fauziah Azmi Fauziah Suanda Dalva Aulia Apandi Ikhwan Aulia Fatahillah Mudhtia Nabila Maulud Mudthia Nabila Maulud Restu Ramania Santana Suryapringgana Taufiq Alamsyah Teguh Abdurrohman Shodiq