Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Permana, Adhe
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Harmonisasi Pengujian Peraturan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Konstitusional Permana, Adhe; Renaldhi, Rendhi; Ambarini, Siti Nur; YL Tobing, Iyus; Sanjaya, Ihsan; Narenda, Sena; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10289

Abstract

The division of authority for judicial review of regulations between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) often leads to overlapping jurisdiction, differing standards of review, and inconsistent rulings. This situation weakens legal certainty and constitutional protection, which should form the foundation of a rule of law state. This research analyzes the source of this disharmony using a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The study's findings indicate the absence of an integrative mechanism between the two institutions to ensure the alignment of review parameters. Therefore, a harmonization model is required to clearly define the boundaries of authority, synchronize the standards of review, and strengthen the coordination of rulings. This harmonization is projected to enhance the effectiveness of constitutional control and guarantee the protection of citizens' rights more consistently.
Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap KUHP Baru Tantangan Harmonisasi Norma Pidana Nasional Sulistiawati, Sulistiawati; Santoso, Muh. Arbai; Bimantara, Adrian; Evita, Chandra; Riyadi, Agus; Permana, Adhe; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The New Criminal Code (KUHP Baru), enacted on December 6, 2022, and effective as of January 2, 2026, represents a significant transformation in Indonesia's criminal justice system. Its implementation not only shifts the approach to criminal law from retributive to restorative, but also opens avenues for the integration of legal review by the Constitutional Court (MK) to ensure the harmonization of national criminal norms. This research aims to analyze the mechanisms of MK's integration of reviewing laws and Regional Regulations (Perda) against the New Criminal Code, and its implications for Article 2 of the New Criminal Code regarding living law and formal legality. Furthermore, this study aims to identify and evaluate the challenges of harmonizing national criminal norms in MK's decisions concerning specific cases such as demonstrations, embezzlement, and insult to state institutions after the implementation of the New Criminal Code since 2026. The research method employed is a normative legal approach with secondary data types, including laws and regulations, MK decisions, and related legal literature. The findings indicate that MK plays a crucial role in maintaining the consistency of national criminal law through the constitutional review of the New Criminal Code and its derivatives. However, challenges in harmonizing national criminal norms persist, particularly in the context of Article 2 of the New Criminal Code which recognizes living law and formal legality, as well as in the regulation of specific cases such as demonstrations, embezzlement, and insult to state institutions. This study recommends better coordination among MK, legislative, and executive bodies to avoid normative conflicts and ensure the fair and effective application of criminal law.
Co-Authors Agus Riyadi Ambarini, Siti Nur Bimantara, Adrian Candra, Firman Adi Evita, Chandra Narenda, Sena Renaldhi, Rendhi Sanjaya, Ihsan Santoso, Muh. Arbai Sulistiawati Sulistiawati YL Tobing, Iyus