Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Hambatan Tak Terlihat: Rendahnya Literasi Hukum dan Akses Masyarakat terhadap Judicial Review di Indonesia – Analisis Yuridis Normatif untuk Reformasi Inklusif Anggerina, Desi Puspita; Salatun, Mochamad Ridzky; Siddik, Rifqy Afrizal; Hartono, Toto; Dudikoff, Luthfy Abbad; Muidah, Ida; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10273

Abstract

Judicial review, as a constitutional instrument in Indonesia, aims to uphold the supremacy of the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945) and protect citizens' constitutional rights. However, low legal literacy and limited public access to this mechanism hinder effective public participation. This article analyzes these issues through a normative juridical approach using secondary data from journals, regulations, and court decisions. The findings indicate that limited understanding, complex procedures, and high costs lead to unequal access, where only influential groups dominate the judicial review of legislation. Recommendations include enhancing legal socialization and procedural reforms to democratize judicial review.
Proses Perancangan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia Tantangan dan Reformasi dalam Era Digital Ratnawati, Endah; Witandri, Witandri; Rayhan, Ahmad Zaki; Masharin, Masharin; Hardiyanto, Arif; Prasetyo, Agus; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10274

Abstract

This article examines the process of legislative drafting in Indonesia, emphasizing the stages of law formation, the roles of the House of Representatives (DPR) and the government, and the challenges arising in the digital era. The primary focus is on the revision of Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), which reflects efforts to adapt legal frameworks to technological advancements. Through normative juridical analysis, the article identifies issues such as regulatory disharmony, overload of legal products, and the need for AI-based reforms. The findings indicate that reforms like digitalization of legislative processes and the application of regulatory guillotine can enhance efficiency and legal certainty. Recommendations include integrating technology for more inclusive public participation.
Implikasi Hukum Perubahan Undang-Undang Penyelenggaraan Ibadah Haji dan Umrah: Telaah terhadap Legalitas Umrah Mandiri dan Pembentukan Kementerian Sulistiawati, Sulistiawati; Santoso, Muh. Arbai; Bimantara, Adrian; Evita, Chandra; Riyadi, Agus; Purwanto, Eko; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10275

Abstract

This article analyzes the review of Hajj and Umrah regulations in Indonesia, specifically Law Number 8 of 2019 and its recent revisions. This research aims to identify legal issues arising from the implementation and changes in regulations, and to examine their implications for pilgrim protection and the effectiveness of pilgrimage organization. Utilizing a literature study approach and regulatory analysis, this article will discuss legislative dynamics, including the legalization of independent Umrah and the establishment of a Ministry of Hajj and Umrah. The research findings are expected to provide a deep understanding of the current legal landscape of Hajj and Umrah and its future challenges.
Refleksi Metodologis dalam Ilmu Hukum: Meneropong Paradigma Baru untuk Responsivitas Sosial Furqon, Furqon; Fitriya, Riska; Nurfatah, Imron; Nugraha, Bayu Adhy; Nasyruddin, Achmad; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10276

Abstract

Legal science as a dynamic discipline continues to face demands for adaptation to rapid social changes. This article reflects on conventional legal research methodologies and proposes a new paradigm that is more responsive to contemporary social issues, such as structural injustice, digitalization, and environmental sustainability. Through a reflective-critical approach, this research analyzes the limitations of traditional normative and empirical methods, and explores interdisciplinary integration with social sciences, anthropology, and technology. The proposed new paradigm emphasizes community participation, research ethics, and the tangible social impact of legal studies. The results indicate that socially responsive legal methodologies can strengthen the role of legal science in shaping inclusive policies and social transformation. This article contributes to the development of more contextual and justice-oriented legal methodologies.
Melacak Jejak Pidana AI: Status Subjek Hukum dan Model Pertanggungjawaban di Indonesia Fitriya, Riska; Furqon, Furqon; Nurfatah, Imron; Nugraha, Bayu Adhy; Nasyruddin, Achmad; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10277

Abstract

The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has brought significant transformations across various sectors, yet it also poses new challenges to the protection of human rights (HAM) in the digital era. This article analyzes the criminal law challenges in Indonesia concerning the misuse of AI, focusing on AI's potential as a legal subject and models of criminal liability under the new Criminal Code (KUHP, Law No. 1 of 2023) and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE). This research indicates that the current Indonesian criminal justice system, predominantly based on the concept of human and corporate legal subjects, faces difficulties in accommodating criminal liability for actions wholly or largely caused by AI. The absence of dedicated AI regulations in Indonesia leads to reliance on existing regulations, such as UU ITE and the Personal Data Protection Law, which are often inadequate. The article identifies legal gaps in the KUHP and UU ITE concerning the definition of legal subjects and the attribution of fault for AI. Several potential models of criminal liability are proposed, including the artificial personhood approach, producer/developer-based liability, operator/user-based liability, and the application of strict liability principles and audit standards. The urgency of cybercrime law reform in Indonesia is emphasized to ensure a comprehensive legal framework that protects human rights from AI misuse.
Metode Penelitian Hukum Progresif dalam Mengidentifikasi 'Pasal Karet' pada Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) dan Urgensinya bagi Demokrasi Digital Sangkala, Robert; Komala, ⁠Ida; Wibowo, Satria Ari; Roif, Roif; Asari, Ali; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10283

Abstract

The digital era has revolutionized societal interactions, including expression and democratic participation. However, Indonesia's Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (UU ITE), revised twice (2016 and 2024), still contains ambiguous provisions known as "rubber articles," such as Article 27 paragraph (3) on defamation. These articles often lead to the criminalization of criticism and restrict freedom of expression, conflicting with digital democracy principles. This study applies progressive legal research methods to identify and critique these articles, emphasizing a dynamic and responsive normative approach to socio-technological dynamics. Through juridical and sociological analysis, the research reveals the urgency of reforming UU ITE to strengthen digital democracy in Indonesia. Findings indicate that a progressive approach can serve as a foundation for reconstructing more inclusive regulations, protecting human rights (HAM) in the digital age, and preventing power abuses. Recommendations include establishing a national digital information commission and substantive revisions to problematic articles.
Dinamika Legislasi dan Reformasi Hukum di Indonesia Tahun 2025: Studi Implementasi UU No. 4 Tahun 2023 (UU PPSK) dan Dampaknya Ikbal, Ikbal; Abi, Kemal; Alif, Sayyid; ⁠Jueni, ⁠Jueni; Endarto, Dwi Wahyu; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10285

Abstract

This research comprehensively examines the dynamics of legislation and legal reform in Indonesia in 2025, with a primary focus on the implementation of Law No. 4 of 2023 concerning Financial Sector Development and Strengthening (PPSK Law). The background of this study is the urgency of strengthening financial sector regulations to maintain system stability, protect consumers, and support sustainable economic growth amidst global and domestic challenges. The main objectives are to analyze the substance of the PPSK Law, evaluate its implementation process up to 2025, identify challenges encountered, and measure its impact on the Indonesian financial sector. Employing a normative legal research method enriched with an empirical approach through document analysis and literature review, this study finds that the PPSK Law has brought significant changes in the governance and supervision of the financial sector. Nevertheless, its implementation faces various challenges, including the harmonization of derivative regulations, infrastructure readiness, and business actors' adaptation. Notable impacts include improved stability, consumer protection, and market efficiency, though continuous evaluation is needed to ensure optimal achievement of reform objectives. The research concludes by emphasizing the importance of synergy among institutions and regulatory adaptation to technological innovation.
Harmonisasi Pengujian Peraturan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kepastian Hukum dan Perlindungan Konstitusional Permana, Adhe; Renaldhi, Rendhi; Ambarini, Siti Nur; YL Tobing, Iyus; Sanjaya, Ihsan; Narenda, Sena; Candra, Firman Adi
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v8i1.10289

Abstract

The division of authority for judicial review of regulations between the Constitutional Court (MK) and the Supreme Court (MA) often leads to overlapping jurisdiction, differing standards of review, and inconsistent rulings. This situation weakens legal certainty and constitutional protection, which should form the foundation of a rule of law state. This research analyzes the source of this disharmony using a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The study's findings indicate the absence of an integrative mechanism between the two institutions to ensure the alignment of review parameters. Therefore, a harmonization model is required to clearly define the boundaries of authority, synchronize the standards of review, and strengthen the coordination of rulings. This harmonization is projected to enhance the effectiveness of constitutional control and guarantee the protection of citizens' rights more consistently.