Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Legal and Public Health Governance for Sustainable Integration of Mobile Health (mHealth) Technologies in East Africa Aidonojie, Paul Atagamen; Mugabe, George Mulingi; Aidonojie, Esther Chetachukwu; Jufri, Muwaffig; Mustafa , Mundu M.; Ekpenisi, Collins; Eregbuonye, Obieshi; Antai, Godswill Owoche; Okpoko, Mercy; Kelechi, Uzoho; Alammari, Khalid Saleh Y
Buletin Ilmiah Sarjana Teknik Elektro Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026): February
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.12928/biste.v8i1.14943

Abstract

Mobile health (mHealth), which comprises mobile health applications, telemedicine, SMS-based treatments, and wearable health monitors, has the power to change healthcare delivery, but at the same-time, it is going through a rapid developmental phase that regulators cannot keep up with. This is considered a necessity in balancing the Integration of mHealth technology innovation through enhanced laws within East Africa. It is in view of this that this examines the legal and public health framework in integrating mHealth technology in enhancing the healthcare system within East Africa. The study adopts a doctrinal and systematic analytical method of study directed by the PRISMA framework, allowing thorough legal analysis while at the same time guaranteeing a transparent, stringent, and comprehensive review of related literature. The study found that fragmentation of laws, lack of centralized public health and data governance, unequal access to mHealth services, and constraints on innovation, weakens the integration and regulation of mHealth. Hence, the study recommends and concludes that for effective integration of mHealth in enhancing the public health care system, the research insists on a unified legal system that states unambiguously which data protection benchmarks apply, what the liability conditions are, what the integration of different systems and regulations requirements is, and how to coordinate among different countries' regulators. Besides that, it suggests measures for strengthening the capacity of the targeted groups, such as: medical professionals, trainees, users’ digital literacy campaigns, and local mHealth technology developers’ institutions’ support.
Cabinet Structure during the State Financial Crisis: A Comparison of Budget Efficiency Policies between Indonesia and Argentina Vianti Nur Mauliddya Ike Safitri; Berrahlia, Badreddine; Alammari, Khalid Saleh Y
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Publisher : CV. Pustaka Parawali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71239/jicl.v2i3.197

Abstract

This study examines the financial crises in Indonesia and Argentina, focusing on the cabinet structure policies of these two countries. It aims to examine the policy models of the Indonesian and Argentine governments for restructuring their cabinets in response to the crisis while also implementing budgetary efficiency measures. This study contributes to the development of an adaptive and efficient model for cabinet restructuring in response to financial crises, and can serve as a reference for the formulation of fiscal and institutional policies. The study employs a doctrinal legal research method with a statute and comparative approach. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s operational expenditures are high; however, political considerations have resulted in inefficiencies, such as the expansion of ministries from 34 to 48. Indonesia’s fiscal efficiency remains inconsistent due to political limitations. In contrast, Argentina has enacted comprehensive and more decisive reforms, reducing the number of ministries from 18 to 8 and implementing extensive cuts across the government. Therefore, the results suggest that Indonesia’s policies are constrained by political and legal constraints, whereas Argentina’s approach relies on strong executive decrees. This study recommends that Indonesia consider merging related ministries and streamlining bureaucratic structures in accordance with national circumstances. Additionally, it proposes strengthening executive governance through legal reforms, such as establishing a formal presidential office and restricting the scope of non-essential institutions, to improve budget efficiency.