Berrahlia, Badreddine
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Tax Regulation Challenges in the Digital Economy Era: Legal Analysis and Implications in Indonesia Rizqiyanto, Naufal; Rizqi, M.; Afsa, Fahmil Alfian Rizkia; Berrahlia, Badreddine
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 7, No 1 (2025): February
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v7i1.28540

Abstract

The rapid growth of the digital economy has transformed global business landscapes, creating significant challenges for tax regulation in Indonesia. This study aims to identify the obstacles in regulating the digital economy, analyze the impact of legal uncertainty on taxpayer compliance, and evaluate how technological infrastructure limitations hinder effective tax enforcement. Applying normative legal methods and an exploratory approach, this research employs statute and case-based approaches, with data collected from primary legislation and secondary literature sources. The findings indicate that legal uncertainties regarding MSME identification in digital transactions, digital economy subjects, permanent establishment (PE) status, and tax collection mechanisms significantly reduce taxpayer compliance. Additionally, the limited technological infrastructure is the major obstacle to enforcing tax regulations effectively. This research contributes to emphasize the need of the clear legal frameworks and robust technological systems to address those challenges. In conclusion, to resolve the issues requires regulatory reforms to provide unambiguous guidelines for digital transactions, increased investments in technological infrastructure, and the development of comprehensive frameworks to enhance compliance and enforcement. The study recommends a strategic focus on harmonizing legal standards and technological advancements to support a sustainable tax ecosystem in the digital economy.
Toward an Effective Legal Framework for Digital Health E-Commerce: Insights from the UAE and Indonesia Benseghir, Mourad; Maamar Bentria; Zerara, Aouatef; Bendriss, Halima; Berrahlia, Badreddine
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): November, 2025: Law, Policy, and Governance in Contemporary Socio-Economic Tran
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i2.12152

Abstract

This study compares the regulatory frameworks of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Indonesia governing the online provision and sale of health-related technologies. In technology-driven healthcare, data privacy and the security of digital transactions are central concerns. Employing a normative juridical approach, the research analyses applicable legislation, regulatory instruments, and scholarly literature in both jurisdictions. The findings indicate that the UAE has developed a relatively robust and comprehensive framework, particularly in relation to data protection and the security of digital health infrastructure, supported by detailed and stringent rules. By contrast, Indonesia’s regulatory framework remains less effective in practice, hindered by limited public awareness of data security, uneven enforcement, and implementation challenges at the local and regional levels. The study underscores the key differences between the two systems and highlights the need, especially in Indonesia, for clearer, more enforceable rules on health-related online transactions and stronger safeguards for personal health data.
Cabinet Structure during the State Financial Crisis: A Comparison of Budget Efficiency Policies between Indonesia and Argentina Vianti Nur Mauliddya Ike Safitri; Berrahlia, Badreddine; Alammari, Khalid Saleh Y
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Publisher : CV. Pustaka Parawali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71239/jicl.v2i3.197

Abstract

This study examines the financial crises in Indonesia and Argentina, focusing on the cabinet structure policies of these two countries. It aims to examine the policy models of the Indonesian and Argentine governments for restructuring their cabinets in response to the crisis while also implementing budgetary efficiency measures. This study contributes to the development of an adaptive and efficient model for cabinet restructuring in response to financial crises, and can serve as a reference for the formulation of fiscal and institutional policies. The study employs a doctrinal legal research method with a statute and comparative approach. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s operational expenditures are high; however, political considerations have resulted in inefficiencies, such as the expansion of ministries from 34 to 48. Indonesia’s fiscal efficiency remains inconsistent due to political limitations. In contrast, Argentina has enacted comprehensive and more decisive reforms, reducing the number of ministries from 18 to 8 and implementing extensive cuts across the government. Therefore, the results suggest that Indonesia’s policies are constrained by political and legal constraints, whereas Argentina’s approach relies on strong executive decrees. This study recommends that Indonesia consider merging related ministries and streamlining bureaucratic structures in accordance with national circumstances. Additionally, it proposes strengthening executive governance through legal reforms, such as establishing a formal presidential office and restricting the scope of non-essential institutions, to improve budget efficiency.