Vianti Nur Mauliddya Ike Safitri
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Efektivitas Peran Pemerintah Desa dan Tokoh Masyarakat dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Non-Litigasi di Desa Jarin Vianti Nur Mauliddya Ike Safitri; Moh. Soleh
Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Federalisme : Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/federalisme.v1i4.276

Abstract

Indonesia is an archipelago with diverse languages, ethnicities, religions and cultural tribes. Although there are many differences, Indonesian citizens always uphold kinship, tolerance and harmony in their environment. This is in accordance with the motto of the Indonesian nation, namely “Bhineka Tunggal Ika” which describes the diversity of the Indonesian nation, but still one. In dispute resolution, in addition to legal channels, another form of dispute resolution in the form of alternative out-of-court settlements, which is often used by the Indonesian people, is the concept of mediation. One example of its application is in Jarin Village, Pamekasan, which resolves disputes through a negotiation process to obtain a peaceful agreement. The parties to the dispute are assisted by mediators, who are played by the village government and community leaders who are respected by the community. The form of research method used is Empirical. The research data comes from field samples that will be analyzed in a qualitative description. The results of the research are used to determine how effective mediation is in resolving disputes non-litigatively or without legal and/or judicial channels.
Cabinet Structure during the State Financial Crisis: A Comparison of Budget Efficiency Policies between Indonesia and Argentina Vianti Nur Mauliddya Ike Safitri; Berrahlia, Badreddine; Alammari, Khalid Saleh Y
Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Indonesian Constitutional Law
Publisher : CV. Pustaka Parawali

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71239/jicl.v2i3.197

Abstract

This study examines the financial crises in Indonesia and Argentina, focusing on the cabinet structure policies of these two countries. It aims to examine the policy models of the Indonesian and Argentine governments for restructuring their cabinets in response to the crisis while also implementing budgetary efficiency measures. This study contributes to the development of an adaptive and efficient model for cabinet restructuring in response to financial crises, and can serve as a reference for the formulation of fiscal and institutional policies. The study employs a doctrinal legal research method with a statute and comparative approach. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s operational expenditures are high; however, political considerations have resulted in inefficiencies, such as the expansion of ministries from 34 to 48. Indonesia’s fiscal efficiency remains inconsistent due to political limitations. In contrast, Argentina has enacted comprehensive and more decisive reforms, reducing the number of ministries from 18 to 8 and implementing extensive cuts across the government. Therefore, the results suggest that Indonesia’s policies are constrained by political and legal constraints, whereas Argentina’s approach relies on strong executive decrees. This study recommends that Indonesia consider merging related ministries and streamlining bureaucratic structures in accordance with national circumstances. Additionally, it proposes strengthening executive governance through legal reforms, such as establishing a formal presidential office and restricting the scope of non-essential institutions, to improve budget efficiency.