Kholik, Anas
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Epistemologi Empiris Qur’ani: Kajian Tafsir Tematik atas QS. Āli ‘Imrān [3]: 190-191, al-Ḥujurāt [49]: 6, dan al-Mulk [67]: 3-4 Kholik, Anas; Sarnoto , Ahmad Zain
AT-TAISIR: Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): AT–TAISIR Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies
Publisher : LPPM Institut Daarul Qur'an Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The study of empirical verses in the Qur’an has gained renewed significance in the context of twenty-first–century scientific advancement, digital transformation, and the rapid circulation of information. Although discussions on the integration of science and religion have grown within Islamic philosophy and contemporary epistemology, many of these works exhibit a fundamental gap: the Qur’anic text itself is not analyzed as the primary object of study. Instead, empirical verses are often cited as slogans to support the discourse of “Islamic scientific ethics” or “integrative epistemology,” without undergoing rigorous tafsir-based examination. This research fills that gap by Conducting a thematic exegesis of three foundational empirical verses: Āli ‘Imrān [3]:190–191, which emphasizes cosmic contemplation (tadabbur); al-Ḥujurāt [49]:6, which establishes the principle of verification (tabayyun); and al-Mulk [67]:3–4, which introduces the principle of repeated observation (takrār al-baṣar). Employing the tafsīr mawḍū‘ī (thematic exegesis) method, this study integrates linguistic analysis, semantic mapping, contextual background, and a comparative reading of classical and contemporary commentaries. The findings reveal that these three verses collectively construct a Qur’anic empirical epistemology founded on three pillars: reflective observation (tadabbur), verification of information (tabayyun), and repeated examination (takrār al-baṣar). Together, they offer not only a Qur’anic articulation of empirical reasoning but also a value-laden framework in which empirical inquiry is guided by spiritual awareness and ethical responsibility. This research contributes to Qur’anic studies by grounding the discourse of empiricism and epistemology in the text itself rather than in philosophical abstraction. The proposed model provides a conceptual foundation for developing research methodology, scientific ethics, and Islamic education that are firmly rooted in the Qur’anic worldview.
Epistemologi Hudā dalam QS 2:185: Analisis Leksikal, Tafsir Klasik, dan Relevansi Kontemporer Kholik, Anas; Hariyadi, Muhammad
AT-TAISIR: Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): AT–TAISIR Journal of Indonesian Tafsir Studies
Publisher : LPPM Institut Daarul Qur'an Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to examine the meaning of hudā in Qur’an 2:185 as the epistemological foundation through which the Qur’an guides human beings in understanding, evaluating, and verifying truth. Previous research has generally discussed hudā within theological or broad thematic frameworks, resulting in limited exegetical attention to key verses that articulate the epistemic structure of Qur’anic guidance. To address this gap, this study applies a thematic exegesis (tafsīr mawḍū‘ī) approach consisting of three main stages. First, a lexical analysis of the root h-d-y is conducted to map its Qur’anic semantic field, including its core meaning, morphological derivations, and contextual usage across the Qur’an. Second, Qur’an 2:185 is examined through comparative exegesis (tafsīr muqāran), incorporating the interpretations of al-Ṭabarī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, Ibn Kathīr, and M. Quraish Shihab to identify both convergences and divergences in their understanding of hudā. Third, an epistemological synthesis is developed to relate the structural concept of Qur’anic guidance to contemporary challenges, particularly the rise of post-truth discourse, information overload, digital misinformation, and algorithmic bias that increasingly shape modern epistemic environments. The findings indicate that hudā in Qur’an 2:185 encompasses three interconnected epistemic dimensions: (1) dalālah, the directional guidance that orients human cognition toward truth; (2) bayān, the explanatory dimension that clarifies legal, ethical, and theological principles; and (3) tamyīz, the faculty of discerning truth from falsehood through a synergy of revelation, reason, and empirical reality. This study concludes that hudā is not merely spiritual guidance but a coherent Qur’anic epistemology relevant for strengthening scientific ethics, knowledge verification, and intellectual integrity in the digital age.