Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tadhkirah: Jurnal Terapan Hukum Islam dan Kajian Filsafat Syariah Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Fathurrohman Nur Hidayat
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Hukum Merokok dalam Islam: Analisis Perbandingan Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah Fathurrohman Nur Hidayat; Rendy Aprilio Sulaiman; Jelita Tibyana Shidqy; Nazwa Angrraeni; Ester Aprilia Diyan Sari; Baidhowi
TADHKIRAH: Jurnal Terapan Hukum Islam dan Kajian Filsafat Syariah Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Desember: TADHKIRAH: Jurnal Terapan Hukum Islam dan Kajian Filsafat Syariah
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/tadhkirah.v2i4.325

Abstract

This study examines the comparative fatwas of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) regarding the Islamic legal ruling on smoking in the Indonesian context. The research employs a qualitative method through a literature-based analysis of official documents, academic journals, and decisions from Bahtsul Masā’il and the Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid. The findings indicate that Muhammadiyah declares smoking as prohibited (ḥarām) because it contradicts the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah), particularly in preserving life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) and wealth (ḥifẓ al-māl). Conversely, NU categorizes smoking as reprehensible (makrūh) on the basis that no definitive textual evidence explicitly forbids it, while also considering socio-economic factors within society. Muhammadiyah adopts a normative-preventive approach, whereas NU emphasizes a cultural-educational one. The difference between the two fatwas reflects not a contradiction but a constructive ikhtilāf, enriching the diversity of Islamic jurisprudence in Indonesia.
Ilusi Kota Berkelanjutan di Tengah Problematika Pengelolaan Sampah Perkotaan Nur Sabrina Kumalasari; Irmayanti Septiana Putri; Fathurrohman Nur Hidayat; Rendy Aprilio Sulaiman; Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikri
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v3i3.1012

Abstract

Rapid urban growth is often linked to the narrative of sustainable development, yet the reality is that fundamental issues remain in the management of urban waste. This paper aims to examine the gap between the concept of a sustainable city and sub-optimal waste management practices. Through a normative legal approach involving an analysis of legislation and relevant literature, it has been found that the implementation of waste management policies continues to face various challenges, such as weak law enforcement, a lack of policy integration, and low levels of public participation. On the other hand, the use of the label ‘sustainable city’ tends to be symbolic and does not yet reflect comprehensive practices. This paper positions the issue of waste as a key indicator in assessing urban sustainability. The novelty of this study lies in its critical approach, which links the discourse on sustainability with the contextual realities of waste management, thereby offering a more reflective and distinct perspective from previous studies.
Penyalahgunaan Wewenang Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta: Analisis Celah Hukum dan Lemahnya Pengawasan Fathurrohman Nur Hidayat; Rendy Aprilio Sulaiman; David Frans Rafael Simorangkir; Rois Faisal Amin; Baidhowi Baidhowi
Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Mei: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik dan Negara
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti Dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/hukum.v3i3.1021

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the abuse of authority by notaries in the making of authentic deeds, focusing on the forms of misconduct, legal loopholes, and weaknesses in the supervisory system. The research employs a qualitative method with a normative juridical approach through library research, examining laws and regulations, legal doctrines, scholarly literature, and relevant cases related to notarial practice. The findings reveal that abuse of authority occurs due to both negligence and intentional actions. Common forms of misconduct include the failure to verify the authenticity and completeness of supporting documents, the preparation of deeds outside the notary’s authorized jurisdiction, the delegation of notarial duties to unauthorized parties, and the existence of conflicts of interest that compromise impartiality. In addition, legal loopholes arise from ambiguous regulatory provisions, inconsistencies in legal interpretation, and the rapid development of digital technology, particularly electronic transactions and online services, which have not yet been comprehensively regulated. The study also finds that the existing supervisory system remains weak, reactive, and often ineffective in preventing violations before they occur. Therefore, the abuse of notarial authority should be viewed as a systemic issue requiring comprehensive reforms in legal regulations, supervisory mechanisms, professional ethics enforcement, and notarial education to ensure legal certainty, accountability, and the preservation of public trust in the notarial profession.
Co-Authors Baidhowi Baidhowi Baidhowi David Frans Rafael Simorangkir Ester Aprilia Diyan Sari Irmayanti Septiana Putri Jelita Tibyana Shidqy Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikri Nazwa Angrraeni Nur Sabrina Kumalasari Rendy Aprilio Sulaiman Rois Faisal Amin