Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR)
Anjani, Diva Rafi
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
CONSUMER RIGHTS PROTECTION IN GROUP ORDER PRACTICES: LEGAL ANALYSIS OF SELLER LIABILITY Anjani, Diva Rafi; Wulandari, Ayun Novita; Aulia, Alifiana Arif Rahmah
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), October 2025
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i1.551

Abstract

This study analyzes legal protection for consumers and seller liability in the practice of Group Order (GO), a collective ordering mechanism popular in the digital era but often gives rise to problems such as default, delays, non-conforming goods, and fraud. Using normative legal research methods through analysis of the Civil Code, Commercial Code, Consumer Protection Law, and expert doctrines, this study assesses the legal relationship between GO admins, sellers, and consumers as a contractual relationship that gives rise to rights and obligations. Forms of default include non-delivery of goods, goods not as described, or unjustified delays. Both sellers and GO admins can be held accountable and consumers have the right to obtain compensation, refunds, or settlement through the BPSK or litigation channels. This study emphasizes the need for strengthening regulations and supervision so that GO practices are more transparent, accountable, and able to provide legal certainty for consumers.
CUSTOMARY LAND CONFLICTS BETWEEN DAYAK INDIGENOUS LAW AND STATE LAW IN INDONESIA Anjani, Diva Rafi; Hasibuan, Imelda; Nafhani, Ahmad; Subroto, Aryo
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v8i2.2045

Abstract

Indonesia’s legal system is characterized by legal pluralism, in which state law coexists with customary law (adat) practiced by indigenous communities. Despite constitutional recognition and supportive judicial decisions, conflicts over customary land persist, particularly among Dayak indigenous communities in Kalimantan. These conflicts largely arise from structural incompatibilities between state land law—centered on administrative legality, formal registration, and written evidence—and customary law, which is grounded in communal ownership, oral traditions, and social legitimacy. This article analyzes conflicts between Dayak customary law and state law in the governance of customary land from a legal anthropology perspective. It examines the operation of Dayak customary law as a living law, identifies the causes and forms of conflict with state legal regimes, and assesses the implications of these conflicts for customary land governance and legal certainty. The research employs a qualitative legal-anthropological approach. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with customary leaders, community members, and relevant stakeholders, complemented by participant observation and document analysis. The data were analyzed using descriptive and interpretative methods, drawing on the concepts of legal pluralism and semi-autonomous social fields. The findings demonstrate that Dayak customary law remains effective in regulating land control, use, and dispute resolution at the community level. However, conflicts persist due to the dominance of formal state legal mechanisms that marginalize customary authority in land administration, licensing, and development processes. Normative recognition of indigenous rights alone has proven insufficient to secure legal protection for customary land. The study argues that substantive integration of customary institutions into state land governance frameworks is essential to reduce conflict, enhance legal effectiveness, and ensure meaningful protection of indigenous land rights.
Co-Authors Ahmad Nafhani Aryo Subroto Aulia, Alifiana Arif Rahmah Hasibuan, Imelda Wulandari, Ayun Novita