Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal Dan Rule of Reason Dalam Putusan KPPU Tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga Dimas Aryadiputra; Deny Slamet Pribadi; Aryo Subroto
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753

The emergence of an economic impact analysis in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in Article 5 of the UULPM which should use the approach in that article is Per se Illegal, including Decision No. 08/KPPU-L/2018, Decision No. 04/KPPI-I/2016, Decision No. 32/KPPU-L/2008, Decision No. 26/KPPU-L/2007, and Decision No. 02/KPPU-I/2003 by analyzing the use of a single Per se Illegal approach in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in ensuring legal certainty. The approach in this study uses doctrinal research. From the results of the analysis of the decision related to the price fixing cartel in the consideration of the commission assembly, it has been found in the form of economic evidence/economic analysis which is a characteristic of the Rule of Reason approach to the reasons for the emergence of the economic analysis not being explained explicitly and clearly by the commission assembly, regarding the assessment that can be made. carried out by the KPPU regarding the agreement in Article 5 of the UULPM, economic evidence may appear if the requirement to prove the agreement is difficult to find. Legal considerations using the Per se Illegal approach as the sole approach in the KPPU's decision related to price fixing cartels in ensuring legal certainty, this has been in line with what is positively regulated in Article 5 of the UULPM wherein the provision contains the phrase "prohibited" on behavior and the resulting impact. must be wrong or illegal so that it does not need further analysis. Keywords: per se illegal; rule of reason; price fixing cartel

Perbedaan Penerapan Pendekaran Per se Illegal dan Rule of Reason dalam Putusan KPPU tentang Kartel Penetapan Harga Dimas Aryadiputra; Deny Slamet Pribadi; Aryo Subroto
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 18 No 1 (2022): Volume 18, Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v18i1.753

The emergence of an economic impact analysis in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in Article 5 of the UULPM which should use the approach in that article is Per se Illegal, including Decision No. 08/KPPU-L/2018, Decision No. 04/KPPI-I/2016, Decision No. 32/KPPU-L/2008, Decision No. 26/KPPU-L/2007, and Decision No. 02/KPPU-I/2003 by analyzing the use of a single Per se Illegal approach in the decision of the price fixing cartel case in ensuring legal certainty. The approach in this study uses doctrinal research. From the results of the analysis of the decision related to the price fixing cartel in the consideration of the commission assembly, it has been found in the form of economic evidence/economic analysis which is a characteristic of the Rule of Reason approach to the reasons for the emergence of the economic analysis not being explained explicitly and clearly by the commission assembly, regarding the assessment that can be made. carried out by the KPPU regarding the agreement in Article 5 of the UULPM, economic evidence may appear if the requirement to prove the agreement is difficult to find. Legal considerations using the Per se Illegal approach as the sole approach in the KPPU's decision related to price fixing cartels in ensuring legal certainty, this has been in line with what is positively regulated in Article 5 of the UULPM wherein the provision contains the phrase "prohibited" on behavior and the resulting impact. must be wrong or illegal so that it does not need further analysis. Keywords: per se illegal; rule of reason; price fixing cartel

Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Tanah dan Bangunan Bagi Pembeli Perumahan Korpri Griya Mutiara Indah di Penajam Paser Utara Ismi Dayana; Purwanto; Aryo Subroto
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 19 No 1 (2023): Volume 19, Nomor 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

One of the forms of transfer of regional property is through a grant with the approval of the regent. However, civil servants as recipients of land grants in 2008 and 2014 have not been able to issue them as Certificates of Ownership. This study aims to identify the inhibiting factors for the issuance of Property Rights Certificates, as well as to analyze legal certainty regarding land and building ownership for buyers and to find out the forms of efforts that can be taken by grantees. This study produces and proposes the following findings: First, the inhibiting factors in the issuance of certificates of property rights at the Korpri Griya Mutiara Indah housing estate in North Penajam Paser are the legal substance factor and the legal factor. second, the legal certainty of land and building ownership for the buyer in the form of Building Use Rights on the land of Management Rights which is still a regional asset and the efforts that can be made by the recipient of the land grant for the Korpri Griya Mutiara Indah Housing in North Penajam Paser can be done first. through the Regional Finance and Assets Agency, which then develops regional property in the form of land with management rights, approval from the DPRD is needed so that civil servants can apply for an upgrade to a Certificate of Ownership to the land office of North Penajam Paser Regency.

EFEKTIVITAS HUKUM ADAT SASI DALAM PELESTARIAN SUMBER DAYA ALAM PADA MASYARAKAT AMBON: The Effectiveness of Sasi Customary Law in Preserving Natural Resources in the Ambon Community Alfons Vindy; Aryo Subroto
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 15 No. 2 (2024): Dialogia Iuridica Journal Vol. 15 No. 2 Year 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v15i2.8432

This research aims to examine and analyze the regulation of Sasi customary law and the effectiveness of Sasi law in the right to conserve natural resources in Ambon society. This research is conducted using empirical legal research method. The results of the study show that Sasi customary law plays an important role in the conservation of natural resources of the Ambon community. Sasi customary law provides general guidelines on human behavior, establishes women's rights, prevents crime, distributes natural resources fairly, and determines how to manage natural resources at sea and on land.This research is also to determine the effectiveness of sasi customary law in saving the natural resources of the Ambon community, and that sasi customary law is able to be applied amidst social, economic and environmental changes in natural resource management, and researchers also examine the obstacles and challenges of implementing sasi customary law and evaluate the role of government and related stakeholders ini supporting natural resource conservation. Based on data analysis, there is a gap between the application of Sasi customary law and the real need to preserve environmental functions. As a recommendation, efforts are needed to create synergy between Sasi customary law and regulation which applies, like Basic Agrarian Law, for ensure conservation sustainability and can provide insight into customary law which ca contribute to the conservation of natural resources. Strengthening the Ambon community's understanding and awareness of the importance of Sasi customary law is also key to improving its effectiveness.

Peran Pemerintah dalam Menjaga Hak-Hak Masyarakat Hukum Adat: Tantangan Di Masa Kini Fiqri, Muhammad Fahrizal; Hasiholan Sitorus, Daniel Pahala; Bahtera, Dhedhe Nur; Subroto, Aryo
JURNAL SYNTAX IMPERATIF : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan
Publisher : CV RIFAINSTITUT

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntaximperatif.v5i3.417

Masyarakat hukum adat adalah entitas yang memiliki otonomi dengan hak-hak konstitusional yang harus dilindungi. Namun, pada kenyataannya, pengakuan terhadap masyarakat hukum adat sebagai subjek hukum sering kali masih lemah. Oleh karena itu, jurnal ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan hambatan dalam implementasi pengakuan terhadap masyarakat hukum adat serta menjelaskan mekanisme pemerintah dalam melindungi hak-hak masyarakat hukum adat melalui peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan metodologi hukum normatif kualitatif yang menjelaskan permasalahan hukum berdasarkan undang-undang sebelumnya yang relevan dan melalui kajian pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat adat di Indonesia memiliki otonomi dalam mengatur kehidupan mereka yang berkembang bersama komunitasnya. Namun, pengakuan terhadap keberadaan masyarakat hukum adat masih menghadapi hambatan struktural, terutama dalam proses legislatif yang lambat dan rumit. Keterlambatan dalam pengesahan undang-undang yang mengakui dan melindungi masyarakat adat menyebabkan berbagai masalah, termasuk pelanggaran hak individu dan kolektif masyarakat hukum adat. Oleh karena itu, pemahaman dan pengakuan terhadap masyarakat hukum adat di Indonesia sangat penting untuk memastikan keberlanjutan, keadilan, dan harmoni dalam masyarakat. Tindakan konkret dari pemerintah, lembaga legislatif, dan lembaga negara terkait lainnya diperlukan untuk secara efektif menangani masalah perlindungan dan pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat

Model Aksi Afirmatif Pemenuhan Hak Masyarakat Adat di Kawasan Ibu Kota Nusantara (IKN) Susmiyati, Haris Retno; Grizelda, Grizelda; Harjanti, Wiwik; Alfian, Alfian; Subroto, Aryo
Jurnal HAM Vol 15, No 3 (2024): December Edition
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2024.15.219-238

The decision to build a new capital on the Kalimantan Island called Nusantara caused various conflicts, such as the neglect and marginalization of indigenous peoples and the ignoring of their certainty of access and meaningful participation. This paper explains how the substance of the Nusantara Capital development regulation is to provide full protection to Indigenous peoples or vice versa, how it impacts the protection of Indigenous people's rights, as well as how the affirmative action model fulfills the rights of Indigenous peoples in the Nusantara Capital area. Through a socio-legal approach as the method, the results of the study found that the constitution has regulated the recognition of indigenous peoples, but in the substance of regulations related to the Nusantara capital, the phrases that regulate are very weak. The phrases used do not explicitly ensure the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples, which has an impact on various neglect of the existence of indigenous peoples. As a result, a model of affirmative action is needed for indigenous peoples in the regulation of the Nusantara capital. This includes ensuring access for indigenous peoples to be involved in policymaking. Furthermore, transparency of information in the development of the Nusantara capital is important to formulate policies that accommodate the protection and fulfillment of the rights of indigenous peoples. It is important to ensure the recognition of indigenous peoples and their living space through an affirmative action model regulated by the head of the Nusantara capital authority.

Tradisi Carok Dalam Pluralisme Hukum Di Indonesia Zulfa, Qatrunnada Assyifa Shabrina; Sidiq, Rachmad Indrawan; Subroto, Aryo
Jurnal Analisis Hukum Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38043/jah.v7i2.5243

Negara memiliki tanggung jawab dalam melindungi segenap hak-hak yang melekat dalam diri warga negaranya, tidak terbatas suku, etnis, hingga agama apapun. Dalam Undang-Undang Dasar pun telah dijamin menganai perlindungan hak dasar yaitu hak untuk hidup serta hak kebudayaan. Lalu bagaimana jika ada kebudayaan yang akhirnya melanggar hak dasar manusia itu sendiri, terlebih lagi ketika kebudayaan ini terletak pada persimpangan antara hukum adat yang menjadi salah satu tonggak dalam system hukum yang berlaku diIndonesia dengan hukum pidana serta Sistem hukum negara yang berlaku menjadi secara nasional. Untuk menjawab hal itu diadopsilah konsep system hukum pluralisme hukum yang kemudian akan menyelesaikan dan memberi jalan dalam penyelesaian permasalahan tersebut. Tradisi Carok yang menimbulkan korban Jiwa, menimbulkan banyak kontroversial dalam penyelesaiannya. Namun sebagai warga negara yang terikat dengan Peraturan Perundangundangan, maka haruslah mengikuti peraturan perundnag-undangan pula. Dan hukum adat serta kebudayaan yang berlaku haruslah pula sejalan dengan tujuan negara dan tidak bertentangan dengan peraturan yang hierarkinya lebih tinggi.

Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Tanah dan Bangunan Bagi Pembeli Perumahan Korpri Griya Mutiara Indah di Penajam Paser Utara Dayana, Ismi; Purwanto; Subroto, Aryo
Jurnal Risalah Hukum Vol 19 No 1 (2023): Volume 19, Nomor 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/risalah.v19i1.893

One of the forms of transfer of regional property is through a grant with the approval of the regent. However, civil servants as recipients of land grants in 2008 and 2014 have not been able to issue them as Certificates of Ownership. This study aims to identify the inhibiting factors for the issuance of Property Rights Certificates, as well as to analyze legal certainty regarding land and building ownership for buyers and to find out the forms of efforts that can be taken by grantees. This study produces and proposes the following findings: First, the inhibiting factors in the issuance of certificates of property rights at the Korpri Griya Mutiara Indah housing estate in North Penajam Paser are the legal substance factor and the legal factor. second, the legal certainty of land and building ownership for the buyer in the form of Building Use Rights on the land of Management Rights which is still a regional asset and the efforts that can be made by the recipient of the land grant for the Korpri Griya Mutiara Indah Housing in North Penajam Paser can be done first. through the Regional Finance and Assets Agency, which then develops regional property in the form of land with management rights, approval from the DPRD is needed so that civil servants can apply for an upgrade to a Certificate of Ownership to the land office of North Penajam Paser Regency.

Peran Negara Dalam Menjaga Eksistensi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Subroto, Aryo
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i1.457

Kostitusi telah mengamanatkan kepada negara untuk mengakui dan menghormati kesatuan masyarakat hukum adat beserta segala hak-haknya. Terhadap amanat tersebut kemudian secara teknis dilaksanakan oleh pemerintah sebagai penyelenggara negara. Dalam tataran yuridis telah banyak produk hukum yang diundangkan oleh pemerintah dalam hal memberikan dasar kepastian hukum untuk memberikan ruang kepada masyarakat hukum adat dalam konteks untuk menjaga eksistensi mereka. Namun hal itu, belum memberikan jaminan dalam tataran praktek bagi terjaganya eksistensi masyarakat hukum adat, konflik-konflik yang berimbas pada terampasnya hak masyarakat hukum adat masih marak terjadi. Hingga pada tahun 2014 lalu pemerintah melalui kementerian dalam negeri mengeluarkan Permendagri Nomor 52 tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat, permendagri ini kemudian cukup memberi harapan bagi masyarakat hukum adat dalam hal membantu untuk menjaga eksistensi mereka melalui penetapan kepala daerah.

Kontroversi Pertambangan Illegal Pada Tanah Ulayat Kutai Barat (Studi Kasus PT. Trubaindo Coal Mining) Budhaeri, Lida Khalisa; Maharani, Citra Ayu Deswina; Afifah, Hautami Nadia Zahratul; Pribadi, Ghanis Bintang Desyanur; Astarina, Yennita; Subroto, Aryo; Kuspraningrum, Emilda
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 9 No 1 (2025): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (April 2025)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/jb7bdk15

PT. Trubaindo Coal Mining (PT. TCM) dianggap telah melakukan pertambangan ilegal karena telah memanfaatkan tanah ulayat tanpa izin masyarakat adat setempat. Karena itu, penulis membuat jurnal dengan judul “Kontroversi Pertambangan Ilegal Pada Tanah Ulayat Warga Kutai Barat (Studi Kasus Pada PT Trubaindo Coal Mining (TCM))”. Penelitian ini menggunakkan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil yang didapati dari penelitian yang dilakukan ialah didapati bahwa penyalahgunaan tanah ulayat ini sering terjadi akibat ketidakjelasan Pasal 135 Undang-undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2009 tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara. Karena itu, dilakukan penelitian untuk membahas terkait implikasi hukum pertambangan ilegal tersebut serta bagaimana peran pemerintah dalam menindaklanjuti konflik tersebut.

Title

Found 19 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 19 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 19 Documents
Search