Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Misykat: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Al-QurÆan, Hadist, Syariah dan Tarbiyah At-Ta'aruf: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Mohammad Alfin Niam
Unknown Affiliation
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
EPISTEMOLOGI PENAFSIRAN MUHAMMAD TAHIR-UL-QADRI TERHADAP TERM AYAT PEMUKULAN SUAMI TERHADAP ISTRI (WAḌRIBŪHUNNA) Huda, Misbahul; Misbahul Huda; Mohammad Alfin Niam
At-Ta'aruf : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 4 No 2 (2025): At-Ta'aruf : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59579/hccwz492

Abstract

Umumnya para ulama menafsiri waḍribūhunna dengan penafsiran haqiqi yakni menimpakan seuatu atas sesuatu (memukul). Tetapi Muhammad Tahir-Ul-Qadri menafsiri waḍribūhunna secara majazi. Ia menafsiri Waḍribūhunna bukan dengan memukul, tetapi melakukan perpisahan sementara antara kedua belah pihak (suami dan istri). Penulis bermaksud akan menelusuri bagaimana sumber, metode dan validitas penafsiran Muhammad Tahir-Ul-Qadri terhadap Waḍribūhunna dalam an-Nisa 34. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif yang bersifat kepustakaan. Data primer bersumber dari artikel Muhammad Tahir-Ul-Qadri yang berjudul The Linguistic and Legal Implications of ‘Waḍribūhunna’in Sūra al-Nisāʾ (4: 34) dan sumber sekunder yang bersumber dari buku-buku dan dokumen yang terkait dengan objek penelitian. Pendekatan yang dipakai adalah pendekatan filosofis, yaitu melalui teori epistemologi. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa sumber penafsiran Muhammad Tahir-Ul-Qadri terhadap waḍribūhunna yaitu bersumber dari teks, rasio dan realitas. Kemudian metode yang dipakai adalah metode tematik (maudhu’i), termasuk dalam corak tafsir ijtima’i dengan pendekatan tafsir kontekstual (sosio-historis). Penafsiran Qadri valid secara pragmatis karena memiliki manffat dan dapat di implementasikan. Secara korespondensi kurang valid karena bertentangan dengan salah satu riwayat fakta asbab nuzul. Sementara secara koherensi juga kurang begitu valid karena bertentangan dengan klaim ijmak para ulama. 
Tafsir Ahkam Melalui Kitab al-Maḥṣûl Karya Fakhruddin al-Razi Terhadap Hukum Pernikahan Beda Agama Mohammad Alfin Niam; Misbahul Huda
MISYKAT Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Al-Quran Hadist Syari ah dan Tarbiyah Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Misykat: Jurnal-ilmu-ilmu Al-Quran, Hadits, Syariah dan Tarbiyah
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana IIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33511/misykat.v10n1.100-113

Abstract

This paper is a study of tafsir ahkam that examines the ruling on interfaith marriage by using Kitab al-Maḥṣûl by Fakhruddin al-Razi as the main reference. Interfaith marriage remains a relevant issue in the dynamics of modern Muslim society, especially amid the increasing desire to marry people of other religions and the declining interest in the institution of marriage. This research analyzes Qur'anic verses that appear contradictory, such as Surah al-Baqarah [2]: 221 and Surah al-Mumtahanah [60]: 10, which generally prohibit marriage between Muslims and non-Muslims, and Surah al-Mā’idah [5]: 5, which allows Muslim men to marry women from the People of the Book. The study uses a qualitative method with a library-based approach. Al-Razi’s rejection of the absolute authority of ijma’ (consensus) opens up space for more flexible interpretations of Islamic law, taking into account textual evidence, social realities, and the principle of public interest (maslahah). Umar ibn Khattab’s cautious stance on marriage with the People of the Book also highlights the importance of contextual considerations. Based on this analysis, the author concludes that interfaith marriage (with the People of the Book) is not permitted, except in specific urgent circumstances that fulfill a greater public interest, differing from al-Razi’s interpretation in Mafātīh al-Ghayb, which is more permissive toward such marriages.
Co-Authors Misbahul Huda Misbahul Huda