Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Reforma Agraria Sebagai Bentuk Kemajuan AtauKemunduran Pengelolaan Tanah Di Indonesia sadzili, muchlis
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/a29e3r17

Abstract

Penulisan ini merupakan kajian singkat terhadap suatu kebijakan yang dibuat pada masa pemerintahan Presiden Joko Widodo (Jokowi) yaitu kebijakan soal Reforma Agraria. Semangat dari kebijkan ini adlah untuk redistribusi tanah atu bagi-bagi sertifikat tanah. Namun pada pelaksaannya jauh dari semangat tersebut dan jutru mengalami kemunduran dalam hal pengelolaan tanah di Indonesia. Adanya hal tersebut terjadi tidak terlepas dari politik hukum pembuatan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (UU CILAKA). Padahal sbeelumnya semangat dari Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (UUPA) sudah sangat baik bahkan mendapat apresiasi dari dunia karena adanya pengaturan terhadap pengelolaan tanah yang baik. Maka dari itu selayaknya dan sudah semestinya negara menjalankan reforma agraria sejati.
Politik Impunitas dan Stagnasi Akuntabilitas Konstitusional di Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Hukum Tata Negara Sadzili, Muchlis; Yusdiyanto, Yusdiyanto; Muhtadi, Muhtadi
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1874

Abstract

The persistence of unresolved gross human rights violations in Indonesia reflects a deeper structural problem within the constitutional system, where legal accountability mechanisms remain weak and vulnerable to political intervention. This condition has enabled the emergence and consolidation of a politics of impunity, further reinforced by state-sponsored symbolic practices that normalize authoritarian legacies and erode public demands for justice. This study aims to analyze how the politics of impunity is formed and reproduced within Indonesia’s constitutional framework and to examine the role of symbolic state practices in sustaining the stagnation of constitutional accountability for gross human rights violations. Methodologically, this research employs a normative juridical type of research using constitutional law and socio-legal approaches. The unit of analysis includes constitutional norms, statutory regulations, judicial decisions, state policies, and symbolic practices related to human rights accountability. The study utilizes secondary data obtained through documentary and literature-based research, including legislation, court rulings, official state narratives, academic writings, and reports from human rights institutions. Data are analyzed through qualitative normative analysis, complemented by critical discourse analysis to assess the interaction between legal structures and symbolic narratives. The findings reveal that impunity is reproduced through stalled legal processes, weak institutional independence of human rights bodies, and the dominance of political calculations in state decision-making. Additionally, symbolic practices such as the legitimization of authoritarian figures contribute to the preservation of impunity by obscuring collective memory, reducing the urgency of accountability, and weakening constitutionalism in Indonesia’s democratic order.
Perlindungan Hukum atas Waktu Kerja dan Waktu Istirahat bagi Buruh di Kota Bandar Lampung Gayatri, Syofia; Khudlori, Ahmad; Satriadi, Ardi; Sadzili, Muchlis
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1880

Abstract

Legal protection of working hours and rest periods is part of the normative rights of workers, guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and labor laws and regulations. This study aims to analyze the implementation of legal protection of working hours and rest periods for workers in Bandar Lampung City, as well as to identify the factors hindering it following the enactment of Government Regulation Number 35 of 2021. This research uses a qualitative approach, employing a normative juridical legal research method with a statutory approach, supported by empirical data obtained through interviews with labor unions and the Bandar Lampung City Manpower Office. The results show that legal protection of working hours and rest periods has not been fully implemented optimally. Violations were still found regarding overtime hours, fulfillment of rest periods, and the provision of food and drinks for workers during overtime. The main obstacles include weak supervision, limited dissemination of regulations, an imbalance in bargaining positions between workers and employers, and the economic conditions of workers. Strengthening supervision and fostering synergy among stakeholders are necessary to ensure effective legal protection.