Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam
Shahibul Hikam, Muhammad Athaillah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Normative Construction and Practical Implications of Industrial Design Disputes: A Juridical Analysis of the Geprek Bensu Case Permadi, Adi; Pranotoputera, Faris Makarim; Husni, Asep; Shahibul Hikam, Muhammad Athaillah; Astarudin, Tatang
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 18 No 1 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.11988

Abstract

Ideally, legal protection for industrial designs in Indonesia consistently adheres to the first-to-file principle, in which the party who first registers their design lawfully and in good faith is entitled to exclusive legal protection. However, in reality, complex disputes arise—as seen in the Geprek Bensu case—where claims over design ownership involve interpretations that touch upon morality, business reputation, and the applicant’s intent. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and practical implications of court decisions in the industrial design dispute between PT Ayam Geprek Benny Sujono and Ruben Onsu, with an emphasis on how the first-to-file principle is applied and interpreted in Indonesian legal practice. The method used in this research is normative legal research with a qualitative-descriptive approach, based on library research of relevant laws, court rulings, and legal literature. The findings indicate that, from a juridical perspective, the Supreme Court firmly upheld the first-to-file principle as stipulated in Article 12 of Law No. 31 of 2000, and rejected claims submitted without novelty and good faith. Normatively, the ruling forms a legal construction that clarifies the standards for industrial design registration and has practical implications by encouraging business actors, particularly MSMEs, to be more proactive in registering their designs lawfully and with integrity to obtain strong legal protection.
Co-Authors Adi Permadi, Adi Astarudin, Tatang Husni, Asep Pranotoputera, Faris Makarim