Juniar, Vindira Edka
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Tumbang Anoi: Manifestasi Teori Living Law Eugen Erlich Dalam Preferensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Suku Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah Tarigan, Alpi Emkananta; Safari, Fuji Syifa; Juniar, Vindira Edka; Simamora, Naomi Artika; Manullang, Tio Evangelish; Ali, Nuraliah

Publisher :

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52947/.v11i2.1107

Abstract

Pluralisme hukum di Indonesia menampilkan konfigurasi interaktif antara hukum negara dan hukum adat yang terus eksis dalam masyarakat multikultural. Salah satu manifestasi penting adalah Perjanjian Tumbang Anoi 1894 yang berfungsi sebagai fondasi hukum adat Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah sekaligus representasi living law sebagaimana dikemukakan Eugen Ehrlich. Penelitian ini bertujuan menelaah bagaimana Kedamangan menjadi preferensi penyelesaian sengketa serta menilai dinamika implementasi Perjanjian Tumbang Anoi dalam konteks pluralism hukum dan sosio-yuridis kontemporer. Metode yang digunakan adalah mixed methods dengan desain sequential explanatory, melalui survei terhadap 116 responden, wawancara mendalam, observasi partisipatif, dan FGD. Analisis data dilakukan dengan pendekatan concurrent triangulation guna mengintegrasikan temuan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa 75% responden lebih memilih penyelesaian berbasis hukum adat dengan tingkat pemahaman 80,8% terhadap Perjanjian Tumbang Anoi. Preferensi tersebut dipengaruhi oleh efisiensi, aksesibilitas, dan keselarasan nilai lokal yang menekankan musyawarah, kekeluargaan, serta keadilan substantif. Dengan demikian, hukum adat Dayak tidak hanya lestari, tetapi juga adaptif, menegaskan posisinya sebagai living law sekaligus instrumen restoratif dalam menjaga harmoni sosial.
ANALYSIS OF POWER ASYMMETRY IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS ANALYSIS OF THE WEAKENING ROLE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS A LAWMAKER Theresia, Louise; Asfia, Hilyatul; Juniar, Vindira Edka
JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 10, No 2: JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : LPPM STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v10i2.1263

Abstract

This study examines the phenomenon of power asymmetry between the executive and legislative branches in the legislative process in Indonesia after the amendment of the 1945 Constitution, which has resulted in the weakening of the role of the House of Representatives (DPR) as a lawmaker. The study aims to analyze the weakening of the DPR's position and the implications of power asymmetry on the quality of national legislation. The methods used are a juridical-normative and a juridical-empirical approach, with qualitative analysis of secondary data in the form of legislative documents, meeting minutes, and literature reviews. The study's results reveal two main findings. First, the DPR has been weakened since the amendment of the 1945 Constitution due to the executive's dominance in controlling the National Legislation Program (Prolegnas) agenda and party coalitions, with 91% of the 48 laws for the 2020-2024 period originating from executive initiatives, making the DPR more of a ratification mechanism than an independent lawmaker. Second, this asymmetry of power has serious implications for the quality of legislation, which lacks transparency and public participation, as seen in the case of the Job Creation Law, which was declared conditionally unconstitutional, and the high number of judicial reviews at the Constitutional Court (more than 1,700 petitions), which indicates a systemic failure of the legislative system. These findings emphasize the need to reformulate the roles and working mechanisms between the DPR and the President to ensure a more balanced, participatory, and accountable legislative process.