Pasaribu, Ahmad Jamil
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Collaborative waste management through pentahelix stakeholder participation: A qualitative study from South Tangerang City, Indonesia Pasaribu, Ahmad Jamil; Suradika, Agus; Mawar, Mawar; Andriansyah, Andriansyah
Social Sciences Insights Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Social Sciences Insights Journal
Publisher : MID Publisher International

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60036/g89fqk12

Abstract

Urban waste management in rapidly growing cities presents persistent governance challenges due to increasing waste generation, limited disposal capacity, and fragmented coordination among stakeholders. This study aims to examine how collaborative governance operates in urban waste management through a multi-stakeholder (pentahelix) framework and to identify key barriers affecting its implementation. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, using in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis involving representatives from government, private sector, community groups, academia, and media. Data were analyzed thematically using a policy implementation perspective to assess coordination, resources, communication, and institutional capacity. The findings reveal that collaboration among stakeholders remains largely partial and fragmented, functioning mainly at the level of coordination rather than integrated governance. Government actors dominate regulatory and facilitative roles, while private stakeholders contribute technological and operational innovations without strong institutional integration. Community participation is present but faces sustainability constraints, and academic inputs are weakly translated into policy processes. Media engagement tends to be reactive rather than strategic. Key barriers include limited inter-stakeholder communication, unclear role distribution, resource constraints, and the absence of a permanent collaborative mechanism. The study underscores the need for institutionalized multi-stakeholder platforms, clearer governance arrangements, and stronger knowledge integration to improve the effectiveness and sustainability of urban waste management. These findings provide practical insights for policymakers seeking to strengthen collaborative governance models in urban environmental management contexts.
Assessing the effectiveness of public participation in regional regulation formulation: Evidence from South Tangerang City, Indonesia Pasaribu, Ahmad Jamil; Suradika, Agus; Mawar; Andriansyah, Andriansyah
Social Sciences Insights Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Social Sciences Insights Journal
Publisher : MID Publisher International

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.60036/1akm5p74

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of public participation in the formulation of regional regulations (Perda) in South Tangerang City and to examine how legal, institutional, and sociocultural factors shape the participatory process. It also seeks to determine whether existing legislative frameworks, particularly Law No. 13 of 2022 are implemented as intended in facilitating meaningful participation. The research employs an empirical legal approach supported by qualitative methods, combining normative analysis of legislation with field data obtained through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document review. Data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, while the effectiveness of participation was assessed through Soerjono Soekanto’s five legal effectiveness factors. The study finds that although the legal framework formally guarantees public participation, its implementation within the DPRD of South Tangerang City remains limited, inconsistent, and largely procedural. Participation tends to involve only invited stakeholders, many of whom lack adequate understanding of the substantive issues, resulting in low-quality input. Institutional gaps, particularly the absence of explicit participation procedures in the DPRD Standing Orders and limited access to draft regulations further weaken engagement. Sociocultural conditions indicate a shifting but still uneven participatory legal culture, where public involvement is recognized yet not fully realized in practice.