Sheira Syaharani Kuan
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Yuridis Sistem Pembuktian dalam Arbitrase Syariah di Indonesia: Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 dan BASYARNAS Lintang Mahapuan Syahbana Tarekat; Sheira Syaharani Kuan; Sawitri Yuli Hartati S
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 2 (2025): December: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/dhbn2944

Abstract

This research examines the evidentiary system in Islamic arbitration in Indonesia based on Law Number 30 of 1999 and the practice of the National Sharia Arbitration Board (BASYARNAS). The study aims to analyze the normative framework governing evidence in Islamic arbitration, the types and probative value of evidentiary instruments applied, and the legal standing of BASYARNAS within the national judicial system. Using normative juridical research methods, this study focuses on statutory regulations, doctrinal legal analysis, and the integration of Islamic legal principles with national arbitration law. The findings indicate that the evidentiary system in Islamic arbitration is characterized by procedural flexibility that allows arbitrators to prioritize substantive justice while remaining within the boundaries of positive law. Documentary evidence, witness testimony, expert opinions, party admissions, and electronic evidence are recognized and assessed through a combination of legal validity and Sharia-based ethical considerations. Furthermore, BASYARNAS holds strong legal legitimacy as an arbitration institution, supported by statutory recognition, regulatory frameworks, and its complementary relationship with the Religious Courts in the execution of arbitral awards. This integration strengthens Islamic arbitration as a credible and effective dispute resolution mechanism in Indonesia’s plural legal system.
Perlindungan Hukum Wakaf Produktif di Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pandeglang Nomor 405/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Pdlg Sabitaqila Suma Farhaniatussafana; Sheira Syaharani Kuan; Tri Utami; Sawitri Yuli Hartati
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/jqm26r94

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection of productive waqf in Indonesia by analyzing the normative framework, administrative governance, and judicial considerations applied in the decision of the Pandeglang Religious Court Number 405/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Pdlg. The research employs a normative juridical method supported by a case-based analytical approach to understand how statutory provisions, waqf documentation, and factual findings influence the validation of a waqf asset. The study highlights that the reliability of waqf documents, the transparency of the nadzir’s management, and the consistency of field evidence are central to judicial reasoning in determining the legal certainty of productive waqf. It further identifies that the effectiveness of waqf protection depends on the integration of Islamic legal principles, statutory regulations, and institutional practice. Strengthened administrative systems, professional governance, and harmonized legal interpretation are needed to ensure that waqf assets maintain their perpetual purpose and fulfill their social and economic functions. Overall, the research provides a comprehensive view of how legal certainty is established in productive waqf disputes.