Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Sabitaqila Suma Farhaniatussafana
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Ad Hoc di Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung dalam Sengketa Konstruksi Sabitaqila Suma Farhaniatussafana; Tri Utami; Sawitri Yuli Hartati
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 2 (2025): December: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/a60t2p42

Abstract

This study examines the legal foundation and judicial reasoning applied by the Supreme Court of Indonesia in reviewing requests for annulment of ad hoc arbitration awards in construction disputes, focusing on how judges interpret the limited grounds for annulment under Law No. 30/1999. The analysis demonstrates that the Court consistently upholds the principle of finality while maintaining a strict supervisory threshold to ensure that the arbitration process remains free from fraud, hidden documents, or procedural manipulation. Construction disputes, which frequently involve complex technical assessments and high contractual risks, require judges to evaluate whether the alleged violations genuinely undermine the legitimacy of the arbitral process rather than merely reflect dissatisfaction with the decision. Findings show a clear judicial pattern that prioritizes procedural integrity over substantive reconsideration of the dispute, aligning national jurisprudence more closely with prevailing international standards. This approach strengthens legal certainty for construction-sector stakeholders while reinforcing the credibility of ad hoc arbitration as an efficient dispute resolution mechanism in Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum Wakaf Produktif di Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Agama Pandeglang Nomor 405/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Pdlg Sabitaqila Suma Farhaniatussafana; Sheira Syaharani Kuan; Tri Utami; Sawitri Yuli Hartati
Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry Vol 1 No 3 (2026): March: Custodia: Journal of Legal, Political, and Humanistic Inquiry
Publisher : CV SCRIPTA INTELEKTUAL MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65310/jqm26r94

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection of productive waqf in Indonesia by analyzing the normative framework, administrative governance, and judicial considerations applied in the decision of the Pandeglang Religious Court Number 405/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Pdlg. The research employs a normative juridical method supported by a case-based analytical approach to understand how statutory provisions, waqf documentation, and factual findings influence the validation of a waqf asset. The study highlights that the reliability of waqf documents, the transparency of the nadzir’s management, and the consistency of field evidence are central to judicial reasoning in determining the legal certainty of productive waqf. It further identifies that the effectiveness of waqf protection depends on the integration of Islamic legal principles, statutory regulations, and institutional practice. Strengthened administrative systems, professional governance, and harmonized legal interpretation are needed to ensure that waqf assets maintain their perpetual purpose and fulfill their social and economic functions. Overall, the research provides a comprehensive view of how legal certainty is established in productive waqf disputes.
Co-Authors Sawitri Yuli Hartati Sheira Syaharani Kuan Tri Utami