Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pendas : Jurnah Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar
Khofifah Choirun Nisya Siregar
Unknown Affiliation
Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
ANALISIS LITERATUR TENTANG PERBEDAAN ONE-WAY, TWO-WAY, DAN MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (MANOVA) Harahap, Asrial Habiby; Khofifah Choirun Nisya Siregar; Almira Amir
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 01 (2026): Volume 11 No. 01 Maret 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i01.40097

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the differences between three types of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), namely One-Way ANOVA, Two-Way ANOVA, and Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) in research. The method in this study is a literature study by analyzing scientific sources relevant to the topic of study. The results of the analysis show that the fundamental difference between the three analyses lies in the number of independent variables and dependent variables used. One-Way ANOVA is applied to analyze the effect of one independent variable on one dependent variable. Two-Way ANOVA is used to test the effect of two independent variables on one dependent variable, including the possibility of interaction between independent variables. Meanwhile, MANOVA is used in research involving more than one dependent variable that is analyzed simultaneously based on one or more independent variables
PENILAIAN AUTENTIK Mona Vebyani; Khofifah Choirun Nisya Siregar; Mariam Nasution
Pendas : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar Vol. 11 No. 02 (2026): Volume 11 No. 02 Juni 2026 Press
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/jp.v11i02.53137

Abstract

Assessment in elementary schools has tended to focus solely on cognitive aspects, thus failing to fully reflect students' competencies. This paper aims to examine the concept, characteristics, and techniques of authentic assessment as a comprehensive evaluation paradigm in elementary education. Through a literature review, it was found that authentic assessment holistically assesses three competency domains: knowledge, skills, and attitudes. It utilizes a variety of techniques such as performance assessment, projects, portfolios, observations, and written and oral tests. Its key characteristics include an orientation toward actual performance, continuous implementation, integration with the learning process, and relevance to everyday life contexts. Authentic assessment shifts the evaluation paradigm from merely measuring "what students know" to "what they can do," thus providing a more accurate and meaningful picture of their competency development. The results of this study emphasize the need for teachers to strategically select and balance assessment techniques according to the competencies being measured, in order to achieve fair, holistic, and high-quality learning evaluation.
Co-Authors Almira Amir Harahap, Asrial Habiby Mariam Nasution Mona Vebyani