Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

The Contribution of the Safavid Dynasty to the Formation of the Islamic Family Law System: Institutionalization of Ja’fari Jurisprudence in Marriage, Divorce, and Inheritance Regulations in Iran Lidia Sandy Kartika; Athia Nur Kamilah; Falih Akmal Wicaksono
Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Darunnajah Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61159/sahaja.v5i1.790

Abstract

This study examines the contribution of the Safavid dynasty (1501–1736) to the formation of the Islamic family law system in Iran, with a particular focus on the institutionalization of Ja'fari jurisprudence in regulating marriage, divorce, and inheritance. Using a historical-juridical approach with qualitative library research methods, the study traces how the Safavid political transformation from a Sufi order (tarīqah) into a Twelver Shi'a state provided the structural foundation for codifying family law norms derived from the Ja'fari school of thought. The findings reveal that the Safavid era introduced significant legal innovations in three key domains: the formalization of permanent (nikāḥ) and temporary (mut'ah) marriage contracts under state-administered sharī'ah courts; the systematization of divorce procedures including ṭalāq, khul', and judicial dissolution; and the implementation of inheritance distribution based on farā'iḍ principles. The study concludes that the Safavid legacy in family law continues to shape Iran's modern legal framework. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing an integrative analysis that bridges the gap between Safavid political historiography and Islamic legal studies, specifically by disaggregating the institutional mechanisms such as the role of the Ṣadr, the appointment of Shi'a qāḍīs, and the scholarly migration from Jabal 'Āmil through which Ja'fari family law norms were systematically codified and enforced, an area that has been largely overlooked in prior scholarship which tends to treat the Safavid legal system as a monolithic entity without examining its specific innovations in the domains of marriage, divorce, and inheritance regulation.
Dispute Resolution in Islamic Economics: A Comparative Study of Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in Indonesia and Malaysia Dinta Kharisma Almeira; Chetrine Alya Rinaima; Athia Nur Kamilah
Al Hukm: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 01: Al Hukm: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies (June 2026)
Publisher : Cv. Kayaswara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of Islamic economic dispute resolution mechanisms in Indonesia and Malaysia, two of the largest Muslim-majority nations in Southeast Asia with rapidly expanding Islamic finance sectors. Employing a normative-juridical approach complemented by comparative legal methodology, this study examines the legislative frameworks, institutional architectures, and procedural modalities governing the settlement of Sharia economic disputes in both jurisdictions. The findings reveal that Indonesia adopts a dual-track system wherein the Religious Courts (Pengadilan Agama) exercise primary adjudicatory jurisdiction over Sharia economic disputes following the enactment of Law No. 3 of 2006, while the National Sharia Arbitration Board (Basyarnas) provides alternative dispute resolution services. Malaysia, by contrast, has developed an integrated framework anchored in the Shariah Advisory Council (SAC) of Bank Negara Malaysia, whose rulings possess binding authority over all courts and arbitral tribunals adjudicating Islamic financial matters. The comparative analysis demonstrates that each jurisdiction has developed contextually appropriate mechanisms shaped by distinct constitutional arrangements, colonial legacies, and legal traditions. This article proposes a harmonization framework that leverages the institutional strengths of both systems, offering policy recommendations for enhancing legal certainty, procedural efficiency, and Sharia compliance in Islamic economic dispute resolution across the ASEAN region
Media Pembelajaran Online : Pemanfaatan Kahoot Dalam Kegiatan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Online Amiirah Aniisah; Athia Nur Kamilah; Aldo Redho Syam
International Journal of Learning and Education Vol 1 No 2 (2025): International Journal of Learning and Education (IJLE)
Publisher : NAJAHA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59683/ijle.v1i2.126

Abstract

This study aims to map trends, thematic evolution, and gaps in the scientific literature concerning online learning evaluation, specifically the utilization of gamified platforms such as Kahoot. This systematic review employs a quantitative bibliometric approach, analyzing articles from the Google Scholar database for the period 2018–2022. The analysis was conducted using the Publish or Perish application for data collection and VOSviewer for network, overlay, and density visualization to identify citation patterns and conceptual clusters. The results indicate a significant surge in publications in 2021, driven by the need for emergency evaluation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The discussion reveals that the literature tends to focus on pragmatic aspects and tool adoption, with limited conceptual linkages to deeper theoretical constructs such as assessment as learning and self-regulation. The key finding highlights the need to shift from "how-to" facilitation-focused research toward exploring how technology can transform assessment practices to support deeper learning. The implication is that future research should investigate intentionally designed, pedagogically sound online evaluations that leverage the unique affordances of digital and game-based tools to foster 21st-century competencies, as well as examine their long-term impact and causal pathways beyond the crisis context.