Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Assessing Higher-Order Thinking Skills in Physics: A Comparative Study of Paper-Based and Computer-Based Method Rahman Eka Cahya Rahman Eka Cahya; Budi Jatmiko Budi Jatmiko; Mita Anggaryani; Dwikoranto; Salma Hasna Hamiydah
Journal of Digitalization in Physics Education Vol. 1 No. 2 (2025): August
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jdpe.v1i2.41235

Abstract

Objective: This research is a quasi-experimental investigation with a non-equivalent control group design, aiming to analyse the differences in the use of CBT and PBT methods for HOTs' question assessments. Method: This research employed a quantitative approach, conducting statistical tests using SPSS 26 on each of 35 students by comparing the N-Gain results in the control group using PBT and the experimental group using CBT. Furthermore, normality tests, homogeneity tests, and independent sample-T tests were conducted to determine the significance of the differences between CBT and PBT results. Results: The N-Gain of the experimental group is 0.7652 higher than the N-Gain of the control group is 0.2272. Therefore, the CBT method is more effective than the PBT method. The datum distributed normally and homogeneously both to control group and experimental group, resulting the Sig. (2-tailed) in the independent sample-T test is 0.000 < 0.05. It is concluded, that there is a significant difference between the use of the PBT and CBT methods for assessing HOTs questions. Novelty: This research compares the use of digital and conventional technology in physics learning, especially to improve students' cognitive domain in achieving high-order thinking skills (HOTs), which is one of the important aspects of 21st-century education.
Ethnomathematical Insights into Student Errors: Javanese Calendar and Pigeonhole Principle Ahmad Ryan Hidayat; Ali Shodikin; Salma Hasna Hamiydah
Journal of Current Studies in SDGs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): August
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sabilul Muttaqin Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63230/jocsis.1.3.58

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to examine the implications for student learning by investigating student errors through the lens of the pigeonhole principle and the Javanese calendar. Method: The study used a descriptive qualitative research method and included six high school students and vocational students. Data collection involved tests and interviews. The researchers focused on Ethnomathematics problems related to the Javanese calendar system. Result: The analysis of student responses revealed several types of errors based on Watson's criteria for error analysis in problem-solving. These errors included inappropriate data, inappropriate procedure, and undirected manipulation. Students struggled with understanding the given information, selecting appropriate procedures, and applying logical reasoning. Novelty: Interestingly, the researchers found that when the students were provided with guidance and assistance, they were able to grasp the concepts and successfully solve the problems. This suggests that the students had the potential to understand the material but lacked prior exposure to the concepts, particularly the pigeonhole principle.
Ethnomathematical Insights into Student Errors: Javanese Calendar and Pigeonhole Principle Ahmad Ryan Hidayat; Ali Shodikin; Salma Hasna Hamiydah
Journal of Current Studies in SDGs Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): August
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Sabilul Muttaqin Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.63230/jocsis.1.3.58

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to examine the implications for student learning by investigating student errors through the lens of the pigeonhole principle and the Javanese calendar. Method: The study used a descriptive qualitative research method and included six high school students and vocational students. Data collection involved tests and interviews. The researchers focused on Ethnomathematics problems related to the Javanese calendar system. Result: The analysis of student responses revealed several types of errors based on Watson's criteria for error analysis in problem-solving. These errors included inappropriate data, inappropriate procedure, and undirected manipulation. Students struggled with understanding the given information, selecting appropriate procedures, and applying logical reasoning. Novelty: Interestingly, the researchers found that when the students were provided with guidance and assistance, they were able to grasp the concepts and successfully solve the problems. This suggests that the students had the potential to understand the material but lacked prior exposure to the concepts, particularly the pigeonhole principle.