Berru Amalianita
Universitas Bengkulu

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IDENTIFIKASI FAKTOR-FAKTOR PENYEBAB STRES AKADEMIK SISWA MAN INSAN CENDEKIA JAMBI Nazila Syifa Thohiroh; Muhammad Ferdiansyah; Berru Amalianita
Jurnal Mahasiswa BK An-Nur : Berbeda, Bermakna, Mulia Vol 12, No 1 (2026) - IN PRESS
Publisher : Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al-Banjari Banjarmasin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/jmbkan.v12i1.17428

Abstract

Academic stress is a psychological phenomenon commonly experienced by students, related to the pressure from high academic demands and the limitations of an individual’s ability to adjust to these demands. This study aims to identify the factors causing academic stress experienced by students at MAN Insan Cendekia Jambi. Using a quantitative approach with a descriptive research design, the population of this study consists of 238 students from MAN Insan Cendekia Jambi. The sampling technique used in this study is nonprobability sampling with a purposive sampling technique, which is based on specific criteria. The criteria for this study were students categorized as experiencing moderate to severe stress, as identified through a preliminary study using the DASS-21 (Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale) instrument. As a result, 43 students were selected as the sample for this study. The data collection tool used in this study was a questionnaire using a Likert scale model. The results of the study indicate that academic stress among students at MAN Insan Cendekia Jambi is influenced by several main factors, both internal and external. The self-imposed factor accounted for 17.74%, followed by the factor of frustration at 17.65%. The conflict factor was identified as a cause of stress with a percentage of 17.07%. Subsequently, the pressures factor contributed 15.87%, while the physical environment factor had a percentage of 12.29%. The school-related factor followed with a percentage of 10.66%, and finally, the family factor was identified as a cause of academic stress with a percentage of 8.71%.
Fear of missing out (FoMO) and digital well-being: a systematic literature review Yola Eka Putri; Ifdil Ifdil; Linda Fitria; Berru Amalianita; Rizki Novirson
Jurnal Konseling dan Pendidikan Vol. 14 No. 1 (2026): JKP
Publisher : Indonesian Institute for Counseling, Education and Therapy (IICET)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/1205100

Abstract

llowing the pandemic, social media usage has increased rapidly. This situation exacerbates the phenomenon of individuals' Fear of Missing Out (FoMO). The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic synthesis of the relationship between Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) and digital wellbeing in the post-pandemic era, covering research articles published between 2016 and 2024. Data was sorted using the PRISMA method and systematically collected from Scopus, using a Boolean search to identify scientific articles relevant to the research topic. The selected scientific articles were limited to the years 2016 to 2024. After the data screening procedure, twelve empirical studies were selected for further review. The quality of these studies was evaluated using JBI for quantitative research and CASP for qualitative studies. Of these studies, five were classified as high-quality, while seven were categorized as medium-quality. The main synthesis findings identified: (1) psychological mechanisms, specifically social comparison, Separation Anxiety Disorder (SAD), and emotional dysregulation, these variables were found to mediate the effects of FoMO on digital well-being in eleven of the twelve studies; (2) adverse outcomes, including problematic internet use, anxiety, depression, and low academic achievement, were found across all studies, with adolescents and young adults impacted by FoMO; and (3) interventions, six studies explored interventions for individuals with high levels of FoMO, with two providing empirical validation and four providing conceptual explanations. This research provides novel contributions to the field of mental health related to FoMO behavior. The findings of the reviewed studies integrate evidence related to the mechanisms, outcomes, and interventions of FoMO behavior. This review is also linked to three theoretical frameworks: social comparison theory, self-determination theory, and the digital stress model. This allows the data synthesis to focus on critical gaps in longitudinal methodology, cultural inclusivity, and research on intervention effectiveness, while also proposing a testable conceptual model for future research directed at intervening FoMO with counseling and other psychotherapies.