Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review
Opi Winarti
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Comparative Analysis of Supreme Court and State Administrative Court Decisions in Land Disputes of Former Building Use Rights Certificates(Case Study of Suroto in Semarang) Opi Winarti
Semarang State University Undergraduate Law and Society Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): January-June, 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lsr.v5i1.24770

Abstract

Land disputes are a legal problem that often occurs in Indonesia and require legal certainty in their resolution. One example of a case regarding land ownership issues is in Decision Number 2341 K/Pdt/2016 and Number 50/G/2021/PTUN.SMG. The Suroto case is one example of the difference in decisions between the Supreme Court and the State Administrative Court in determining the validity of land title certificates. This difference has an impact on the protection of ownership rights and legal certainty for the community. This study aims to determine and analyze the comparison of the decisions of the Supreme Court and the State Administrative Court in resolving land disputes, especially in the Suroto case. In addition, this study also examines the legal implications of the differences in these decisions on legal certainty in resolving land disputes. The research method used in this study is normative juridical with a qualitative approach. The results of the study show that: (1) The Supreme Court considers the substantive aspect that the legal aspect of ownership must be based on the previously issued document, as long as there is no element of legal defect in the issuance process, while the PTUN in this decision emphasizes the procedural and administrative aspects related to the legality of the KTUN; (2) The impact of the differences in the decisions of the Supreme Court and PTUN is legal uncertainty for the Plaintiff, where the legality of the previously issued certificate is defeated due to the administrative procedures of the KTUN. Therefore, there needs to be clearer synchronization of laws and policies in resolving land disputes between the Supreme Court and PTUN in order to create legal justice for the community. 
Analisis Yuridis Dinamika dan Dampak Likuidasi Yayasan La Ode Ibrah Haikal Rachman Kadir; Andreas Kevin Patolla; Ilut Saputri; Opi Winarti
Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): April
Publisher : Actual Insight

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56393/nomos.v4i2.2453

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis dinamika dan dampak dari likuidasi yayasan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum empiris. Kajian hukum dalam perspektif empiris adalah kajian tentang hukum dalam yayasan. Data primer yang dikumpulkan di lapangan diperlukan untuk penelitian ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data sekunder berupa kajian pustaka, dengan pedoman hukumnya dari Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2001 tentang Yayasan. Temuan penelitian Likuidasi terjadi ketika yayasan tidak lagi mampu menjalankan kegiatan atau mencapai tujuan yang telah ditetapkan, diperlukan mekanisme untuk menyelesaikan seluruh kewajiban hukum dan keuangan, serta mendistribusikan aset yang tersisa sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Beberapa alasan yang dapat menyebabkan pembubaran yayasan yakni: jangka waktu yang ditetapkan dalam Anggaran Dasar berakhir, tujuan yayasan yang ditetapkan dalam Anggaran Dasar telah tercapai atau tidak tercapai, dan putusan pengadilan yang telah memperoleh kekuatan hukum tetap. Adapun proses likuidasi dan implikasi hukum dalam pembubaran Yayasan ditentukan secara tersurat dalam Bab X Pasal 62 sampai dengan Pasal 68 UU Yayasan.
Co-Authors Andreas Kevin Patolla Ilut Saputri La Ode Ibrah Haikal Rachman Kadir