Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Fairness and Justice
Astrin Bernita Rahma
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Diferensiasi Fungsional Kejaksaan dan Kepolisian dalam Integrated Criminal Justice System (ICJS) Astrin Bernita Rahma; Lutfian Ubaidillah
Fairness and Justice: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2025): Fairness And Justice
Publisher : ‎Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32528/fairness.v23i1.3425

Abstract

Artikel ini membahas diferensiasi fungsional antara lembaga Kejaksaan dan lembaga Kepolisian dalam kerangka Integrated Criminal Justice System (ICJS). Melalui pendekatan hukum normatif dan konseptual, artikel ini mendalami posisi kewenangan Kejaksaan merupakan satu-satunya lembaga yang berwenang menjadi penuntut umum tunggal dan Kepolisian adalah sebagai penyidik tunggal sebagaimana diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Ditemukan bahwa walaupun secara normatif tugas dan fungsi kedua lembaga telah dipisahkan secara tegas, praktik di lapangan sering kali diwarnai oleh ketidak seimbangan kewenangan yang terjadi, hasil kajian menunjukan bahwa prinsip diferensiasi fungsional menuntut adanya pembagian tugas yang jelas tanpa hierarki nilai, namun implementasinya masih menghadapi tantangan koordinasi dan potensi dominasi salah satu pihak. Memahami secara mendalam Undang-Undang Kejaksaan No. 11 Tahun 2021 Pasal 30b huruf c dan studi kasus menunjukkan perlunya penataan ulang hubungan kelembagaan berbasis prinsip asas diferesiansi fungsional. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan mekanisme koordinasi formal, revisi regulasi yang berpotensi menimbulkan konflik tafsir, serta pengembangan kultur kerja sama yang berimbang antara Kejaksaan dan Kepolisian guna mewujudkan sistem peradilan pidana yang efektif, efisien, dan berkeadilan sesuai dengan asas difresiansi fungsional. Dengan demikian, penguatan sinergi antara Kejaksaan dan Kepolisian menjadi agenda penting dalam reformasi hukum acara pidana di Indonesia.
Legal Protection Against The Impact of Geothermal Management on Communities: A Comparative Study in Kenya, Philippines and Indonesia Astrin Bernita Rahma; Ahmad Suryono
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v6i1.44194

Abstract

This study compares the regulatory frameworks in the Philippines, Indonesia, and Kenya to find out how they deal with the issue of legal protection for populations impacted by geothermal energy management. To protect community rights during geothermal energy development, this study primarily aims to determine the conceptualisation, regulation, and implementation of public consultation. The methodological references and respectable academic literature support the use of a qualitative legal research strategy with a regulatory analysis and comparative study technique to ensure the accuracy of the analysis. While there is a very extensive legislative framework in place in Indonesia, the results demonstrate that public consultation is still not consistently carried out, particularly with regard to openness, community participation, and checks and balances. In the Philippines and Kenya, accountability is greater, involvement methods are more inclusive, and procedural requirements are clearer. This research adds to the existing body of knowledge by identifying regulatory gaps in geothermal governance in Indonesia and providing examples of how other nations have strengthened public consultation duties through practices. This research identifies several regulatory and implementation gaps in Indonesia’s geothermal governance, particularly regarding transparency, accountability, and the effectiveness of public consultation mechanisms. Based on the comparative findings from Kenya and the Philippines, this study recommends strengthening Indonesia’s legal framework by implementing clearer procedural standards for public consultation, mandatory publication of consultation outcomes, enforceable government responses to public input, and the establishment of participatory monitoring mechanisms. These reforms are necessary to ensure meaningful community participation and provide stronger legal protection for communities affected by geothermal energy development.
Co-Authors Ahmad Suryono Ubaidillah, Lutfian