Sri Iin Andriyati
Universitas PGRI Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pelaksanaan Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah dalam Pengembangan Profesional Guru: Studi Kasus Sekolah Dasar Sri Iin Andriyati; Harjito; Maryanto
Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan Vol. 15 No. 1 Februari (2026): Didaktika Jurnal Kependidikan
Publisher : South Sulawesi Education Development (SSED)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58230/27454312.3863

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan secara mendalam pelaksanaan supervisi akademik kepala sekolah di SD Negeri 1 Plosoharjo, Kecamatan Toroh, Kabupaten Grobogan, yang meliputi perencanaan, pelaksanaan, dan tindak lanjut supervisi akademik. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus. Subjek penelitian terdiri atas satu kepala sekolah dan lima guru sekolah dasar yang dipilih secara purposive. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara mendalam, observasi lapangan, dan dokumentasi, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan model analisis interaktif yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Keabsahan data dijamin melalui triangulasi sumber dan teknik, member check, serta peer debriefing. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa supervisi akademik di SD Negeri 1 Plosoharjo dilaksanakan secara terencana, dialogis, dan reflektif, dengan menekankan pembinaan profesional guru melalui pendampingan, umpan balik konstruktif, dan tindak lanjut berkelanjutan. Supervisi akademik tidak hanya berfungsi sebagai pengawasan pembelajaran, tetapi juga sebagai sarana pengembangan profesional guru dan penguatan peran kepala sekolah sebagai pemimpin pembelajaran. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoretis dalam memperkaya kajian supervisi akademik serta implikasi praktis bagi kepala sekolah dalam mengembangkan supervisi akademik yang lebih efektif dan kontekstual di sekolah dasar.
Academic Supervision Evaluation Practices in Primary Schools: A Case Study of Developmental Leadership Sri Iin Andriyati; Harjito Harjito; Maryanto Maryanto
Journal of Innovation and Research in Primary Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Papanda Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56916/jirpe.v5i2.3555

Abstract

Academic supervision evaluation plays a crucial role in ensuring the effectiveness of supervisory practices and teacher professional development in primary schools, yet implementation challenges persist globally. This study examined how academic supervision evaluation is implemented by the principal at SD Negeri 1 Plosoharjo, focusing on evaluation mechanisms, guiding principles, and utilization of results for teacher development. A qualitative descriptive case study was conducted with six participants (one principal and five teachers) selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, non-participant observations, and document analysis, then analyzed using systematic data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. Trustworthiness was ensured through triangulation and member checking. Findings revealed that supervision evaluation was implemented systematically through five interconnected components: observation analysis, document review, individualized feedback, reflective dialogue, and follow-up planning. The evaluation process was characterized by objectivity, transparency, dialogue, and teacher agency. An unexpected finding emerged regarding teachers' active participation in interpreting evaluation results and proposing improvement strategies. Evaluation results were utilized as foundations for targeted professional development activities including coaching, workshops, and collaborative learning. Reflective and continuous evaluation of academic supervision contributes to developing reflective learning cultures and enhancing instructional quality and teacher professionalism in primary schools. The study provides empirical evidence for supervision models that balance accountability with developmental purposes.