Erlian Eka Damayanti
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung, Indonesia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reconstructing Good University Governance Based on Islamic Values in Indonesian State Islamic Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review (2020–2025) Trian Hermawan; Fitriyana Fitriyana; Erlian Eka Damayanti; Idham Kholid
Jurnal At-Tarbiyat: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Digital Cultural Transformation and Islamic Character Education
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam An-Nawawi Purworejo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37758/jat.88i3.374

Abstract

Good University Governance (GUG) has emerged as a strategic issue in the management of Indonesian State Islamic Higher Education Institutions (Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri—PTKIN), which operate under a dual mandate as public institutions and as higher education providers grounded in Islamic values. Bureaucratic reform, institutional autonomy, digital transformation of academic services, and increasing demands for public accountability have encouraged PTKIN to adopt contemporary governance principles. Nevertheless, recent scholarly work indicates that the incorporation of Islamic values into GUG practices remains largely normative and symbolic, and has yet to be operationally institutionalized within university governance systems. This study aims to systematically synthesize the development of research on Islamic values–based Good University Governance in PTKIN in Indonesia through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). The review follows the PRISMA 2020 protocol and examines peer-reviewed publications from 2020 to 2025 retrieved from Scopus, SINTA, DOAJ, and reputable international academic publishers. A total of 42 articles were analyzed using qualitative thematic synthesis, supported by quality appraisal instruments from the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) and the Joanna Briggs Institute. The synthesis reveals a substantial increase in GUG-related studies on PTKIN, with dominant emphases on transparency, accountability, participation, leadership roles, and information systems. Islamic values—namely amanah, al-‘adālah, mas’uliyyah, and maslahah—are consistently employed as normative justifications; however, they have not yet been reconstructed as institutional logics shaping measurable governance indicators and mechanisms. The literature is also predominantly characterized by descriptive qualitative studies and localized case analyses, resulting in notable conceptual and methodological gaps. This study contributes by proposing a conceptual model of Islamic values–based Good University Governance that integrates normative, structural, and practical dimensions, positioning Islamic values as the institutional logic underpinning governance practices within PTKIN.
The Caliphate as a Foundation for Socio-Political Stability: A Theoretical Reconstruction of Authority and Governance In Islamic Administration Safitri Agustina; Erlian Eka Damayanti; Muhammad Akmansyah; Zulhanan Zulhanan; Fachrul Ghazi
Assyfa Journal of Multidisciplinary Education Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Assyfa Journal of Multidisciplinary Education (March)
Publisher : CV. Bimbingan Belajar Assyfa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61650/ajme.v4i1.1250

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the concept of caliphate as a normative governance paradigm that functions as the foundation of socio-political stability within the framework of Islamic political thought. This study also examines the epistemological interaction between the concept of caliphate and modern state theories. Methods: This study employed a qualitative-interpretative approach based on doctrinal analysis. Primary data were obtained from normative Islamic political texts, while secondary data were derived from classical and contemporary literature related to Islamic governance, maqāṣid al-sharī'ah, political legitimacy, and modern governance theories. The analysis was conducted through conceptual classification, maqāṣid synthesis, and comparative epistemological dialogue. Results: The study found that the caliphate is conceptually positioned as a normative authority that maintains legal unity, multidimensional stability, and moral legitimacy. Stability within the caliphate framework is not limited to political order but includes spiritual, social, economic, and legal stability. Furthermore, political authority in Islam is fundamentally based on the concept of amanah (trusteeship), rather than absolute sovereignty. This study offers a reconstruction of the caliphate as a moral governance paradigm grounded in maqāṣid al-sharī'ah and provides a dialogical framework between Islamic political theory and modern governance discourse.