Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

POLITIK HUKUM PEMBENTUKAN DELIK PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Kartika, Tantri
The Juris Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : STIH Awang Long Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Criminal Agreement Crimes in the Criminal Code are regulated in Article 110 paragraph (1) to paragraph (4). Same spanning is specifically regulated, namely only against crimes as stipulated in Articles 104, 106, 107 and 108 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, meaning that criminal acts cannot be applied to all criminal acts contained in the Criminal Code, so they are exclusive (exceptions) as stated in Article 110 of the Criminal Code. Looking at the form of this evil agreement the question arises, why should the consensus on the provisions in Articles 104, 106, 107 and 108 of the Criminal Code be punished? This is because lawmakers see crimes (crimes) as stipulated in Articles 104, 106, 107 and 108 of the Criminal Code that they have been seen as serious crimes and very dangerous especially for the safety of the State. Therefore, a crime called crime against the safety of the State must be prevented or eradicated at the time the crime is still at the level of preparation or still at the voorbereidingsstadium.
POLITIK HUKUM PEMBENTUKAN DELIK PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Tantri Kartika
The Juris Vol 2 No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v2i2.41

Abstract

Criminal Agreement Crimes in the Criminal Code are regulated in Article 110 paragraph (1) to paragraph (4). Same spanning is specifically regulated, namely only against crimes as stipulated in Articles 104, 106, 107 and 108 of the Indonesian Criminal Code, meaning that criminal acts cannot be applied to all criminal acts contained in the Criminal Code, so they are exclusive (exceptions) as stated in Article 110 of the Criminal Code. Looking at the form of this evil agreement the question arises, why should the consensus on the provisions in Articles 104, 106, 107 and 108 of the Criminal Code be punished? This is because lawmakerssee crimes (crimes) as stipulated in Articles 104, 106, 107 and 108 of the Criminal Code that they have been seen as serious crimes and very dangerous especially for the safety of the State. Therefore, a crime called crime against the safety of the State must be prevented or eradicated at the time the crime is still at the level of preparation or still at the voorbereidings stadium.
MAKNA PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT DALAM PASAL 15 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 20 TAHUN 2001 TENTANG PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI, DIKAJI DARI HERMENEUTIKA HUKUM (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 21/PUU-XIV/2016) Tantri Kartika
The Juris Vol 3 No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v3i2.71

Abstract

Evil agreement in corruption is regulated in Article 15 of Law Number 20 Year 2001 concerning Amendment to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime. In Article 15 of Law Number 20 Year 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crime, people who are proven to have committed conspiracy to commit corruption can be subject to maximum imprisonment for life, or as short as four years in prison. A fine of Rp. 200 million to Rp. 1 billion will also be given to defendants for conspiracy. The conclusion is in interpreting Article 15 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 using Hans-Georg Gadamer's study of legal hermeneutics law, which according to him can use philosophical hermeneutics to take ontology assignments , that is, the task with regard to the inevitable relationship between the text and the reader, the past, the present that enables understanding. If speaking of the past it is interpreted historically interpretive (interpretation according to history), in this case the judge to obtain an explanation of a provision examining the talk of people regarding the provisions during the formation process (wetshistorisch), or the judge must examine the previous provisions that precedes the current provisions (rechtshistorisch). A judge must see history from the meaning of evil agreement.
KAJIAN YURIDIS ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH ANAK BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JOMBANG NOMOR 24/PID.SUS-ANAK/2020/PN. JBG. Gloria Oktaviani Simatupang; Tantri Kartika
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 11 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tindak pidana persetubuhan terhadap anak merupakan salah satu masalah hukum yang sangat penting untuk dikaji secara mendalam dan tidak hanya terjadi di kota kota besar saja, tetapi juga terjadi dilingkup kabupaten seperti kasus yang terjadi di kabupaten Jombang ini sebagaimana Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jombang Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN. JBG, bahwa anak didakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan bersalah melakukan tindak pidana membujuk Anak melakukan persetubuhan. Adapun Tujuan Penelitian ini untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis penerapan sanksi pidana Terhadap anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum dalam Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan yang dilakukan oleh anak dan Pertimbangan Hakim berdasarkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jombang Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN. JBG. Jenis Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif yaitu Penelitian hukum yang bertujuan untuk menggambarkan tentang penemuan-penemuan, norma-norma, asas-asas hukum positif, sistematika hukum, norma-norma, asas-asas hukum positif, sistematika hukum yang telah tersedia dan terkandung di dalam data sekunder. Simpulan pada penelitian ini adalah Penerapan sanksi pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak tidak dapat diselesaikan secara diversi namun diselesaikan melalui persidangan, sehingga sanksi hukuman terhadap tindak pidana persetubuhan yang dilakukan oleh terdakwa anak terhadap anak dengan menerapkan Pasal 71 Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak dan Pertimbangan Hakim dalam putusan berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jombang Nomor 24/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN. Jbg adalah dengan mempertimbangkan hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan.
Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Hasil Kejahatan Penipuan Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia (Nomor 395 K/Pid.Sus/2018) Delia Permata Sari; Tantri Kartika; Papang Sapari
HUMANIORUM Vol 1 No 03 (2023): Jurnal Humaniorum
Publisher : PT Elaborium Elevasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/hmr.v1i03.17

Abstract

Money laundering crimes under the guise of investment occur a lot and it is very important to study and analyze them. Many losses arise due to money laundering practices, so efforts to prevent money laundering are needed. This study aims to analyze the Crime of Money Laundering in the Decision on Criminal Case No.395 K/Pid.Sus/2018. The type of research used is normative legal research. The charges handed down by the Public Prosecutor against the Defendant are Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Article 3 of Law No. 8 of 2010. With the decision Sentenced criminally to the Defendant therefore with imprisonment for 5 (five) years and a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000, - (one billion rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid it is replaced with imprisonment for 6 (six months).
Regulasi dan Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan dalam Menangani Kebakaran Hutan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Agnes Harvelian; Muhammad Ashraf; Tantri Kartika
HUMANIORUM Vol 1 No 4 (2023): Jurnal Humaniorum
Publisher : PT Elaborium Elevasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The importance of maintaining environmental balance and dealing with complex issues such as forest fires in Indonesia requires attention to the relevant legal aspects. The concept of the environment involves the human area and the accumulation of its activities, with forests playing a central role in maintaining ecosystems and providing benefits for society. Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management is a strong legal basis for dealing with this problem. This research method applies a normative approach and literature study to analyze legal aspects related to forest fires. Within this framework, the statutory approach is used to collect all laws and regulations that are relevant to the legal issues being studied, especially in the context of enforcing criminal law against forest fires as an environmental crime. The results reveal the importance of effective law enforcement in the environmental context, which is regulated by Article 98 of Law Number 32 of 2009. This article outlines criminal sanctions for those who violate air, water, or environmental damage criteria.
Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Hasil Kejahatan Penipuan Berdasarkan Hukum Positif di Indonesia (Nomor 395 K/Pid.Sus/2018) Delia Permata Sari; Tantri Kartika; Papang Sapari
HUMANIORUM Vol 1 No 03 (2023): Jurnal Humaniorum
Publisher : PT Elaborium Elevasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Money laundering crimes under the guise of investment occur a lot and it is very important to study and analyze them. Many losses arise due to money laundering practices, so efforts to prevent money laundering are needed. This study aims to analyze the Crime of Money Laundering in the Decision on Criminal Case No.395 K/Pid.Sus/2018. The type of research used is normative legal research. The charges handed down by the Public Prosecutor against the Defendant are Article 378 of the Criminal Code and Article 3 of Law No. 8 of 2010. With the decision Sentenced criminally to the Defendant therefore with imprisonment for 5 (five) years and a fine of Rp. 1,000,000,000, - (one billion rupiah) with the provision that if the fine is not paid it is replaced with imprisonment for 6 (six months).