Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Dinamika Hukum
Tia Ludiana
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
KEKOSONGAN HUKUM MENGENAI TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DEEPFAKE DALAM UU ITE NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 MENURUT PERSFEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM Indra Mulyana; Yayan Muhamad Royani; Tia Ludiana
Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25157/justisi.v14i1.23344

Abstract

Transformasi tindak pidana siber saat ini didominasi oleh penggunaan teknologi Deepfake yang menyalahgunakan identitas biometrik pejabat publik demi keuntungan finansial. Sayangnya, instrumen hukum positif di Indonesia, terutama Pasal 28 ayat (1) juncto Pasal 45A UU ITE Nomor 1 Tahun 2024, menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan norma (legal lag) yang signifikan. Studi ini difokuskan pada analisis kekosongan hukum (vacuum of norm) yang timbul karena pasal a quo masih mensyaratkan unsur berita bohong dan kerugian konsumen yang tidak relevan dengan sifat kejahatan ini. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa penerapan UU ITE saat ini berpotensi menciptakan impunitas. Hal ini karena Deepfake merupakan fabrikasi realitas sintetik, bukan sekadar penyebaran hoaks dalam transaksi elektronik. Dalam tinjauan Fiqh Jinayah, perbuatan ini dikategorikan sebagai Al-Ghash dan At-Tadlis berat yang mencederai prinsip Maqashid Syariah, khususnya pelindungan akal dan harta. Karena belum adanya dalil yang spesifik, tindak pidana ini masuk dalam ranah Jarimah Ta'zir, yang menuntut hakim menerapkan sanksi maksimal demi menutup celah kerusakan (Sadd ad-Dzari'ah) dan mewujudkan keadilan substantif.
The Right to Remain Silent vs. Defendant Statements: Examining Indonesia's New Criminal Procedure Code Dede Kania; Tia Ludiana; Agi Attaubah Hidayat
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 26 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2026.26.2.17777

Abstract

Article 142 of the New Criminal Procedure Code introduces the right to remain silent, yet it conflicts with Article 235, which continues to recognize defendant statements as valid evidence. This normative discrepancy creates legal uncertainty regarding the protection of suspects' and defendants' rights during the evidentiary process in Indonesia's judicial system. The aim of this research is to examine the existence of Defendant Statements in Indonesia's New Criminal Procedure Code in light of the Right to Remain Silent principle. The research adopts a normative legal method supported by a comparative approach in the United States of America and the Netherlands. It analyzes statutory provisions and compares them with legal systems that firmly uphold the privilege against self-incrimination. The findings demonstrate a clear contradiction between Article 142, which guarantees the Right to Remain Silent, and Article 235, which still recognizes Defendant Statements as valid evidence. This inconsistency creates legal uncertainty and undermines the effective protection of suspects’ and defendants’ rights during the evidentiary process from a critical perspective, suggesting that New Criminal Procedure Code has not fully embraced the principle of due process. It also creates the potential for abuse of power, particularly in practices that pressure defendants into providing statements. This study, therefore, proposes harmonising Articles 142 and 235 to ensure coherence between human rights principles and evidentiary mechanisms. The study contributes to this by offering a doctrinal and comparative framework to reinforce the implementation of the non-self-incrimination principle within Indonesia's criminal justice system.
Co-Authors Agi Attaubah Hidayat Dede Kania Indra Mulyana Yayan Muhamad Royani