Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Pelita
R Lina Sinaulan
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Perkembangan Kapal Rekreasi dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Pelayaran dan Implikasinya Terhadap Pengaturan Hukum dan Koordinasi Kelembagaan Fatiyah Suryani Mile; R Lina Sinaulan; ST Laksanto Utomo; Adi Nur Rohman
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6178

Abstract

Recreational vessels represent an evolution of maritime tourism and shipping activities that are rapidly developing in Indonesia. However, from a legal standpoint, their status and regulation remain unclear. There is an overlap of authority between the Ministry of Tourism and the Ministry of Transportation, as well as disharmony between business classifications in the KBLI (Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification) and the national shipping licensing system. This article aims to analyze the legal status of recreational vessels within the maritime legislation system and its implications for legal certainty and implementation in practice. The method used is normative juridical, employing a statutory and document analysis approach. The findings indicate that recreational vessels still lack an explicit definition in Indonesia’s positive law, and their regulation is not yet harmonized between the maritime and tourism systems. Strengthened regulation and cross-sector harmonization are necessary to ensure legal certainty and support the growth of the marine tourism sector
Rekayasa Sosial dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Negara dalam Program Kesehatan Ibu Anak-Keluarga Berencana Acep Wahyu; Joko Sriwidodo; R Lina Sinaulan
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6179

Abstract

This article examines how the state employs law as an instrument of social engineering in implementing the Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning (KIA–KB) program. Drawing on Roscoe Pound’s theory of law as a tool of social engineering, the study argues that law functions not merely as an administrative mechanism, but as a means of social transformation designed to build public awareness regarding reproductive responsibility, maternal and child health, and family welfare. The discussion is grounded in the constitutional and legal foundations of the state’s responsibility as enshrined in Article 28H and Article 34(3) of the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health, and Law No. 52 of 2009 on Population Development and Family Development. The analysis reveals that the KIA–KB program represents a form of state intervention in shaping social behavior, yet its implementation faces dilemmas between collective social objectives and individual bodily autonomy, gender justice, and moral and cultural values. Issues such as unequal distribution of contraceptives, coercive practices toward low-income women, and weak reproductive education reflect ethical deficiencies in the state’s legal responsibility. Therefore, the article emphasizes the need for a humanistic and rights-based model of legal responsibility that ensures distributive justice, respect for bodily autonomy, and gender equality in reproductive health services. The study concludes that the success of health law should not be measured by the extent of state control over population behavior, but by how effectively it safeguards human rights, social welfare, and substantive justice for all citizens
Rekonstruksi Regulasi dan Kewenangan Majelis Disiplin Profesi dalam Penegakan Etika dan Disiplin Kedokteran di Indonesia Johan Akbari; R Lina Sinaulan; Edi Saputra Hasibuan
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6255

Abstract

This study examines the regulation and authority of the Medical Profession Disciplinary Council (MDPK) in enforcing professional discipline after the enactment of Law Number 17 of 2023 on Health, which repealed Law Number 29 of 2004 on Medical Practice. The research aims to analyze the legal framework governing MDPK, identify weaknesses in the regulation, and explore the urgency of reconstructing its authority to improve effectiveness in protecting patients and ensuring legal certainty for medical professionals. Using a normative juridical method with a statute, case, and conceptual approach, the study reveals that although the new regulation strengthens MDPK’s role in preventing over-criminalization of medical practitioners, it still suffers from regulatory gaps, overlapping authority, and implementation challenges. These include limited resources, lack of integrated information systems, and weak enforcement mechanisms. The findings propose a reconstruction model through the formulation of detailed technical regulations, granting semi-judicial status to MDPK, integrating it into a special medical court system, and developing an integrated case management system. Strengthening MDPK’s authority is essential to create a disciplinary enforcement system that is effective, transparent, and balanced between patient protection and the rights of medical practitioners
Kepastian Hukum Restorative Justice Sebagai Suatu Konsep Pemidanaan dalam Hukum Pidana Dihubungkan dengan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ronaldo Maradona Siregar; Joko Sriwidodo; R Lina Sinaulan; Andravirti Karita
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6300

Abstract

Restorative justice emerges as a sentencing paradigm that shifts orientation from retribution to the restoration of victims’ losses, offenders’ accountability, and social balance. Nevertheless, its implementation in the Indonesian criminal law system still faces fundamental challenges, particularly regarding legal certainty. The fragmentation of sectoral regulations, normative ambiguity, and the contradiction with the retributive paradigm in the old Criminal Code (KUHP) create inconsistencies in practice and weaken legal predictability. This research aims to analyze the gap between the principle of legal certainty (das sollen) and the practice of restorative justice (das sein), as well as to examine the urgency of integrating this concept into the structural sentencing system as part of Indonesian criminal law reform. The study applies a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, combined with qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials and selected empirical case studies. The findings reveal that restorative justice has obtained normative legitimacy through several sectoral regulations (Perpol No. 8/2021, Perja No. 15/2020, Perma No. 1/2024), and explicit recognition in the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1/2023). However, its implementation still encounters challenges such as institutional ego, lack of professionalism among law enforcers, and the persistent gap between normative ideals and practical realities. Therefore, integrating restorative justice into the structural sentencing system is an urgent necessity to ensure harmony between justice, legal certainty, and legal utility in the reform of Indonesian criminal law
Konsep Ideal Pengajuan Justice Collaborator dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Konsep Silang Perkara, Mekanisme Hubungan Kontraktual dan Assesment Luqmanul Hakim; R Lina Sinaulan; Joko Sriwidodo
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6375

Abstract

A justice collaborator (JC) in Indonesia is a term for a criminal who is willing to cooperate with law enforcement to uncover larger, more organized criminal cases. JC status is regulated by Indonesian law and provides protection and rewards for those who qualify. The implementation of the role of justice collaborator (JC) in specific crimes, such as corruption, terrorism, and narcotics, has a deep background and rationale. This concept was born from the awareness that these crimes are often complex and organized, making them difficult to uncover using conventional law enforcement methods. On the one hand, in Indonesia, although the concept of justice collaborator has been adopted, several shortcomings are known, such as the lack of an assessment system for submitting witnesses who wish to cooperate with law enforcement, an assessment of the evidence and statements to be presented by witnesses, and an assessment of the rewards that witnesses deserve for their assistance and cooperation. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method. The materials reviewed are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the concept of justice collaborator still has several shortcomings, including the lack of regulation of which institution has the authority to submit and determine the status of Justice Collaborator, the absence of regulations on cross-examination of witnesses in cases involving justice collaborators, the absence of a clear assessment system for the Justice Collaborator submission process, the evidence presented by Justice Collaborators, and the assessment of awards that Justice Collaborators deserve for their contribution in revealing cases, as well as the absence of regulations on contractual relations between law enforcement and Justice Collaborators
Co-Authors Acep Wahyu Adi Nur Rohman Andravirti Karita Edi Saputra Hasibuan Fatiyah Suryani Mile Johan Akbari Joko Sriwidodo Luqmanul Hakim Ronaldo Maradona Siregar ST Laksanto Utomo