Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.658
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Jurnal Hukum Sasana Jurnal Hukum Pelita Journal of Law and Security Studies Bhayangkara Law Review
Joko Sriwidodo
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Arts Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Polwan dan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT): Analisis Kasus Pembakaran Suami Di Mojokerto Dari Perspektif Gender dan Hukum Novita Irene Wong; Joko Sriwidodo; Edi Saputra Hasibuan
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i1.5527

Abstract

Cases of gender-based violence in the family (KDRT) continue to be an important issue because of its major impact. Gender stereotypes that consider men as perpetrators and women as victims often ignore the fact that women can also be perpetrators. This study uses a normative approach with an analysis of laws and regulations, cases, and literature studies to understand the influence of gender roles in KDRT and the application of the law to perpetrators who are members of the police. The results of the study indicate the need for inclusive legal reform and an understanding of gender equality to ensure equal legal protection for all victims. In cases of KDRT involving female police officers, the application of the PKDRT Law is more relevant because it regulates physical violence that causes death. Handling this case requires a transparent, fair, and objective legal process, regardless of the status of the perpetrator
Rekayasa Sosial dan Tanggung Jawab Hukum Negara dalam Program Kesehatan Ibu Anak-Keluarga Berencana Acep Wahyu; Joko Sriwidodo; R Lina Sinaulan
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6179

Abstract

This article examines how the state employs law as an instrument of social engineering in implementing the Maternal and Child Health and Family Planning (KIA–KB) program. Drawing on Roscoe Pound’s theory of law as a tool of social engineering, the study argues that law functions not merely as an administrative mechanism, but as a means of social transformation designed to build public awareness regarding reproductive responsibility, maternal and child health, and family welfare. The discussion is grounded in the constitutional and legal foundations of the state’s responsibility as enshrined in Article 28H and Article 34(3) of the 1945 Constitution, Law No. 36 of 2009 on Health, and Law No. 52 of 2009 on Population Development and Family Development. The analysis reveals that the KIA–KB program represents a form of state intervention in shaping social behavior, yet its implementation faces dilemmas between collective social objectives and individual bodily autonomy, gender justice, and moral and cultural values. Issues such as unequal distribution of contraceptives, coercive practices toward low-income women, and weak reproductive education reflect ethical deficiencies in the state’s legal responsibility. Therefore, the article emphasizes the need for a humanistic and rights-based model of legal responsibility that ensures distributive justice, respect for bodily autonomy, and gender equality in reproductive health services. The study concludes that the success of health law should not be measured by the extent of state control over population behavior, but by how effectively it safeguards human rights, social welfare, and substantive justice for all citizens
Kepastian Hukum Restorative Justice Sebagai Suatu Konsep Pemidanaan dalam Hukum Pidana Dihubungkan dengan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ronaldo Maradona Siregar; Joko Sriwidodo; R Lina Sinaulan; Andravirti Karita
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6300

Abstract

Restorative justice emerges as a sentencing paradigm that shifts orientation from retribution to the restoration of victims’ losses, offenders’ accountability, and social balance. Nevertheless, its implementation in the Indonesian criminal law system still faces fundamental challenges, particularly regarding legal certainty. The fragmentation of sectoral regulations, normative ambiguity, and the contradiction with the retributive paradigm in the old Criminal Code (KUHP) create inconsistencies in practice and weaken legal predictability. This research aims to analyze the gap between the principle of legal certainty (das sollen) and the practice of restorative justice (das sein), as well as to examine the urgency of integrating this concept into the structural sentencing system as part of Indonesian criminal law reform. The study applies a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, combined with qualitative analysis of primary and secondary legal materials and selected empirical case studies. The findings reveal that restorative justice has obtained normative legitimacy through several sectoral regulations (Perpol No. 8/2021, Perja No. 15/2020, Perma No. 1/2024), and explicit recognition in the new Criminal Code (Law No. 1/2023). However, its implementation still encounters challenges such as institutional ego, lack of professionalism among law enforcers, and the persistent gap between normative ideals and practical realities. Therefore, integrating restorative justice into the structural sentencing system is an urgent necessity to ensure harmony between justice, legal certainty, and legal utility in the reform of Indonesian criminal law
Narkotika dan Ancaman Terhadap Pembangunan Bangsa Sebuah Tinjauan Politik Hukum Telly Areska Putra; M.S Tumanggor; Joko Sriwidodo
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6326

Abstract

The Indonesian narcotics criminal justice system has evolved from a focus on punishment to rehabilitation, driven by concerns over the high rate of drug abuse. Law No. 35 of 2009 and the 2014 Joint Regulation clarify the separation of treatment between dealers (subject to criminal sanctions) and users/addicts (prioritized by rehabilitation). This situation has naturally sparked controversy regarding the ideal legal policy/criminal law in Indonesia for addressing the problem of drug trafficking. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method. The materials reviewed include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that law enforcement policies for drug addicts and abusers are still primarily carried out through the courts. Therefore, efforts to fulfill the rights of drug addicts and abusers (who are considered victims) in the form of rehabilitation must go through a lengthy criminal procedure. In reality, addicts and abusers who go through the criminal process generally lose interest in treating themselves, because they have the view that it is useless to treat themselves if in the end they still have to go to prison later
Konsep Ideal Pengajuan Justice Collaborator dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Konsep Silang Perkara, Mekanisme Hubungan Kontraktual dan Assesment Luqmanul Hakim; R Lina Sinaulan; Joko Sriwidodo
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6375

Abstract

A justice collaborator (JC) in Indonesia is a term for a criminal who is willing to cooperate with law enforcement to uncover larger, more organized criminal cases. JC status is regulated by Indonesian law and provides protection and rewards for those who qualify. The implementation of the role of justice collaborator (JC) in specific crimes, such as corruption, terrorism, and narcotics, has a deep background and rationale. This concept was born from the awareness that these crimes are often complex and organized, making them difficult to uncover using conventional law enforcement methods. On the one hand, in Indonesia, although the concept of justice collaborator has been adopted, several shortcomings are known, such as the lack of an assessment system for submitting witnesses who wish to cooperate with law enforcement, an assessment of the evidence and statements to be presented by witnesses, and an assessment of the rewards that witnesses deserve for their assistance and cooperation. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method. The materials reviewed are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study show that the concept of justice collaborator still has several shortcomings, including the lack of regulation of which institution has the authority to submit and determine the status of Justice Collaborator, the absence of regulations on cross-examination of witnesses in cases involving justice collaborators, the absence of a clear assessment system for the Justice Collaborator submission process, the evidence presented by Justice Collaborators, and the assessment of awards that Justice Collaborators deserve for their contribution in revealing cases, as well as the absence of regulations on contractual relations between law enforcement and Justice Collaborators
Kedudukan Dan Penerapan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Dalam Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Elza Puspa Mardiani; Ramlani Lina Sinaulan; Joko Sriwidodo
Bhara Justisia Vol 3 No 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/jlss.v3i1.5067

Abstract

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 (SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2023) diterbitkan sebagai pedoman teknis yudisial bagi hakim dalam memeriksa dan mengadili perkara, termasuk perkara perceraian di lingkungan Peradilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan hukum SEMA No. 3 Tahun 2023 dalam sistem hukum Indonesia serta penerapannya dalam praktik pemeriksaan perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, yang didukung oleh analisis terhadap putusan-putusan Pengadilan Agama pasca berlakunya SEMA No.3 Tahun 2023. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa secara normatif SEMA tidak berkedudukan sebagai peraturan perundang-undangan, namun memiliki kekuatan mengikat secara internal sebagai pedoman bagi hakim. Dalam praktiknya, penerapan SEMA No.3 Tahun 2023 berpengaruh terhadap pola pertimbangan hakim, khususnya dalam upaya menegakan asar mempersukar perceraian melalui pendalaman alasan perceraian dan optimalisasi upaya perdamaian. Namun demikian, ditemukan adanya perbedaan tingkat penerapan antar hakim yang dipengaruhi oleh interpretasi yudisial dan kondisi faktual para pihak. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan konsistensi penerpapan serta penguatan pemahaman hakim terhadap fungsi SEMA guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan terhadap institusi perkawinan.
Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Tentang Pendaftaraan Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (Ptsl) Di Desa Lambangsari Kecamatan Tambun Selatan Kabupaten Bekasi Benno Abdullah Sunaryo; Joko Sriwidodo; Rahmat Saputra
Bhara Justisia Vol 3 No 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/jlss.v3i1.5140

Abstract

Program Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) merupakan kebijakan strategis pemerintah dalam rangka memberikan kepastian hukum atas hak atas tanah bagi masyarakat. Namun, dalam praktiknya program ini tidak terlepas dari potensi penyimpangan berupa pungutan liar yang berujung pada tindak pidana korupsi, khususnya di tingkat pemerintahan desa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penegakan hukum tindak pidana korupsi dalam pelaksanaan PTSL di Desa Lambangsari, Kecamatan Tambun Selatan, Kabupaten Bekasi, serta mengkaji faktor-faktor yang menjadi hambatan dalam penegakannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan studi kasus terhadap Putusan Nomor 88/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/PN Bandung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat unsur penyalahgunaan kewenangan dan pemaksaan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 12 huruf e Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, namun penerapan norma hukum dalam putusan tersebut belum sepenuhnya mencerminkan asas keadilan dan kepastian hukum. Hambatan penegakan hukum dipengaruhi oleh lemahnya struktur hukum, ketidakjelasan substansi hukum di tingkat daerah, serta budaya hukum masyarakat yang permisif terhadap praktik pungutan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi daerah, peningkatan pengawasan, dan penegakan hukum yang konsisten untuk mencegah terulangnya tindak pidana korupsi dalam program PTSL.
Peranan Politik Hukum Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Dan Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Akmal Alfarisi Widodo; Edi Saputra Hasibuan; Joko Sriwidodo
Bhayangkara Law Review ##issue.vol## 2 ##issue.no## 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/bhalrev.v2i2.4967

Abstract

Politik hukum bertujuan untuk memahami secara keseluruhan tujuan dari hasil hukum berdasarkan interaksi antara politik, hukum, dan hasil hukum. Hukum muncul dari keputusan-keputusan politik, sehingga dapat dilihat sebagai hasil pemikiran para pengambil keputusan politik. Idealnya, semua aktivitas politik harus berada di bawah hukum, namun dalam praktiknya, hukum sering kali dipengaruhi oleh aktivitas politik. Produk hukum memiliki peran penting dalam memenuhi tujuan negara yang tercantum dalam Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Untuk memastikan bahwa Undang-Undang yang dihasilkan sesuai dengan kebutuhan dan keinginan masyarakat, Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan menyatakan bahwa setiap Rancangan Undang-Undang harus dilengkapi dengan naskah akademik. Dalam hubungan dinamis antara hukum dan politik, terdapat kekuatan politik yang kuat untuk mempengaruhi hukum Politik memiliki peranan yang sangat penting dalam penegakan hukum. Jika pemerintah memiliki niat politik yang kuat untuk menegakkan hukum, maka hukum dapat ditegakkan secara efektif. Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa dalam kenyataannya, pengaruh politik sangat besar terhadap operasional hukum, dari proses pembuatannya sampai pada pelaksanaannya. Hubungan sebab akibat antara hukum dan politik, khususnya dalam hukum publik, menunjukkan bahwa sistem politik demokratis cenderung menghasilkan produk hukum yang responsif atau populis, sementara sistem politik otoriter cenderung menghasilkan hukum yang konservatif atau ortodoks.
Penyelesaian Hukum Terhadap Sengketa Hak Waris Anak Beda Agama Menurut Prespektif Hukum Islam Maulana Fahrul Hidayat; Joko Sriwidodo; St Laksanto Utomo
Bhara Justisia Vol 2 No 1 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/cva2yj70

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk  penyelesaian hukum terhadap sengketa hak waris anak beda agama dan keadilan yang hendak dicapai dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak waris anak beda agama, hal ini dikarenakan dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat fenomena perbedaan agama dalam satu keluarga baik karna praktik perkawinan beda agama atau perpindahan agama masih sering terjadi dan bahkan dianggap suatu hal yang biasa terjadi,  padahal perbedaan agama dalam satu keluarga diyakini sebagai faktor utama timbulnya persengketaan dikemudian hari terutama dibidang kewarisan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan untuk menjawab rumusan masalah penelitian 1. Apa bentuk penyelesaian hukum terhadap sengketa pembagian harta warisan bagi anak beda agama dalam Putusan Pengadilan Agama? 2. Apakah implementasi penyelesaian hukum terhadap sengketa pembagian harta warisan bagi anak beda agama di Pengadilan Agama menurut prespektif hukum Islam telah mencapai keadilan? Penelitian ini menarik kesimpulan bahwa terdapat dua bentuk penyelesaian hukum terhadap sengketa hak waris anak beda agama dalam beberapa Putusan Pengadilan agama yaitu penyelesaian dengan upaya perdamaian melalui mediasi diPengadilan menghasilkan kesepakatan bersama dengan tetap melakukan pemberian sebagian harta peninggalan pewaris melalui hadiah, hibah atau wasiat. Dan penyelesaian secara formal melalui tahapan proses persidangan yang hasil akhirnya menghasilkan Putusan Pengadilan Agama dengan pemberian wasiat wajibah kepada anak non-muslim. Selain itu, pelaksanaan pemberian sebagian harta peninggalan pewaris muslim kepada anak yang berbeda agama (non-muslim) tujuan utamanya selaras sebagaimana tujuan dalam ajaran agama Islam yaitu mewujudkan keadilan dan mengusahakan kemaslahatan dan menghilangkan sebesar-besarnya kemudharatan dengan mempertimbangkan ikatan kekeluargaan (nasabiyah) dan hubungan emosional yang sangat dekat antara orang tua dan anak meskipun keduanya saling berbeda agama.
The Protection of Consumers’ Personal Data in Financial Technology–Based Online Lending: A Legal Perspective in Indonesia Joko Sriwidodo; Akmal Alfarisi Widodo; Ramlani Lina Sinaulan
KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): KRTHA BHAYANGKARA: APRIL 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31599/krtha.v20i1.5041

Abstract

Technological advancements have accelerated the use of financial technology (fintech), particularly in online lending services, which facilitate public access to credit but simultaneously raise legal challenges related to the protection of consumers’ personal data. Unauthorized collection, use, or dissemination of personal data by online loan providers without the consent of data subjects poses significant risks to consumer rights. This study examines the legal framework governing personal data protection in online lending services in Indonesia and analyzes the sanctions imposed for violations. Using a normative juridical approach, the study reviews relevant statutory regulations, including Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions, as amended, and Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/POJK.01/2016 on Information Technology–Based Money Lending Services. The findings indicate that service providers are legally obligated to ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of consumers’ personal data and to obtain consent for its use. Violations of these obligations are subject to administrative sanctions, including warnings, fines, restrictions on business activities, and license revocation.
Co-Authors Acep Wahyu Adi Nur Rohman Akmal Alfarisi Widodo Andravirti Karita Benno Abdullah Sunaryo Edi Saputra Hasibuan Elza Puspa Mardiani Luqmanul Hakim M.S Tumanggor Maulana Fahrul Hidayat Muhammad Aris Alsihab Novita Irene Wong R Lina Sinaulan Rahmat Saputra Ramlani Lina Sinaulan Ronaldo Maradona Siregar ST Laksanto Utomo Telly Areska Putra