p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Pelita
M.S Tumanggor
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Upaya Pemerintah Memblokir Game Roblox Yang Mengandung Muatan Permainan Judi Online Nino Gilang Darmawan; M.S Tumanggor; Lukman Hakim
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6325

Abstract

In the modern era, with technological advancements such as smartphones, everything has become easily accessible. From social media to online banking, business information, and business applications, as well as online games for children. However, technological advancements have also led to an increase in crime and violations, including online transactions for narcotics, terrorist communication networks, and crimes such as gambling. This research uses a normative juridical research method, examining primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that the government can take several steps to prevent online gambling, including stricter law enforcement through site blocking and account suspension, digital platform monitoring, public awareness and education, and inter-agency and industry collaboration. The government has a strong legal basis to block online games like Roblox if they are proven to contain gambling elements. However, the effectiveness of such actions still faces several challenges. Ultimately, the government's legal certainty allows for decisive action against online games that facilitate gambling. Nevertheless, the success of online gambling eradication depends on a combination of strong regulation, careful law enforcement, and prevention strategies that focus on education and public awareness
Narkotika dan Ancaman Terhadap Pembangunan Bangsa Sebuah Tinjauan Politik Hukum Telly Areska Putra; M.S Tumanggor; Joko Sriwidodo
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6326

Abstract

The Indonesian narcotics criminal justice system has evolved from a focus on punishment to rehabilitation, driven by concerns over the high rate of drug abuse. Law No. 35 of 2009 and the 2014 Joint Regulation clarify the separation of treatment between dealers (subject to criminal sanctions) and users/addicts (prioritized by rehabilitation). This situation has naturally sparked controversy regarding the ideal legal policy/criminal law in Indonesia for addressing the problem of drug trafficking. The research method used in this study is a normative juridical research method. The materials reviewed include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show that law enforcement policies for drug addicts and abusers are still primarily carried out through the courts. Therefore, efforts to fulfill the rights of drug addicts and abusers (who are considered victims) in the form of rehabilitation must go through a lengthy criminal procedure. In reality, addicts and abusers who go through the criminal process generally lose interest in treating themselves, because they have the view that it is useless to treat themselves if in the end they still have to go to prison later
Perlindungan dan Penegakan Hukum bagi Pengemudi Transportasi Online dalam Perspektif Hubungan Hukum dengan Aplikator di Indonesia Adjie Akbar; M.S Tumanggor; Adi Nur Rohman
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Pelita November 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v6i2.6363

Abstract

This study aims to identify the most appropriate form of legal protection for online drivers. It adopts a normative legal research approach (c), focusing on the application of law and conceptual frameworks, particularly in relation to partnership agreements. This research does not involve hypothesis testing, as normative legal research does not employ hypotheses or empirical data, but rather relies on legal materials.The findings reveal fundamental differences between partnership agreements and employment contracts. The partnership relationship between online drivers and application service providers is unique, as both parties are formally considered equal under Article 36 of Law Number 20 of 2008. However, in social and economic practice, online drivers are often in a weaker position. Therefore, the government, as the sovereign authority, should intervene by providing legal protection through legislation and public policy. Such protection is essential to uphold the rights of online drivers and aligns with John Rawls’ theory of distributive justice