Asysta Amalia Pasaribu
Department of Statistics, School of Computer Science, Universitas Bina Nusantara, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

COMPARISON OF MIXED EFFECT REGRESSION TREE (MERT) AND LINEAR MIXED MODEL (LMM) FOR CLUSTERED DATA ON CASE STUDY HOUSEHOLD POVERTY IN WEST JAVA PROVINCE Nur Fitriyani Sahamony; Asysta Amalia Pasaribu; Bagus Sartono; Khairil Anwar Notodiputro
BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Vol 20 No 3 (2026): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Publisher : PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/barekengvol20iss3pp1869-1892

Abstract

This study compares the performance of the Linear Mixed Model (LMM) and the Mixed Effect Regression Tree (MERT) in analyzing the determinants of household consumption expenditure in West Java Province. The LMM integrates fixed and random effects to account for both individual and regional variations, while MERT extends this approach by incorporating a regression tree framework to capture nonlinear relationships and complex interactions among socio-economic variables. Using data from the 2023 National Socioeconomic Survey (SUSENAS), household consumption expenditure is modeled as an indicator of poverty. The results show that key determinants across both models include the gender and age of the household head, highest educational attainment, household size, land and car ownership, and welfare card ownership. Education and asset ownership consistently emerge as major factors influencing household welfare. The MERT model demonstrates superior predictive performance, with lower RMSE and MAE values compared to the LMM, while offering greater interpretability by identifying specific household profiles. Female-headed households with higher education and no car ownership tend to have higher expenditure in the high-income group, whereas female-headed households with welfare cards remain vulnerable in the low-expenditure group. From a policy perspective, these findings highlight the importance of improving educational access, enhancing asset ownership, and strengthening targeted social protection for vulnerable groups. Overall, while both models contribute valuable insights, the MERT model provides a more flexible and powerful framework for identifying and interpreting the determinants of household welfare in West Java.
MIXED-EFFECT MODELS WITH RESTRICTED MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD (REML), BOOT-STRAPPED REML AND BAYESIAN INFERENCE IN APPLICATION OF GAPMINDER DATA Asysta Amalia Pasaribu; Kusman Sadik; Anang Kurnia
BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan Vol 20 No 3 (2026): BAREKENG: Journal of Mathematics and Its Application
Publisher : PATTIMURA UNIVERSITY

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30598/barekengvol20iss3pp1985-1998

Abstract

Mixed effects model combines fixed effects and random effects, allowing for the analysis of data with both fixed and random variations. This modeling approach is widely utilized across various fields. In R, the lme4 package is commonly employed to estimate mixed effects models using Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML). There are several methods for estimating model parameters, including Bayesian inference, which has gained prominence with ongoing research advancements. Bayesian inference using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is among the most widely used Bayesian methods. Bayesian inference leverages probabilistic distributions to estimate parameters.to understand the general overview of life expectancy, serving as an indicator of survival time across different continents in the Gapminder dataset, it's essential to identify relevant variables after computing mixed effects predictions using Maximum Likelihood and REML estimation. This involves predicting life expectancy by integrating both random and fixed effects, determining relevant variables after estimating the Mixed Effects Model using REML Bootstrap estimation, and identifying influential variables after estimating the Mixed Effects Model using Bayesian MCMC inference. The methods employed include REML, Bootstrapped-REML, and Bayesian MCMC. The results indicate that all inference methods can be utilized to estimate parameters, with all predictor variables influencing life expectancy, except for the population variable. Further research is recommended to utilize data with more complex predictor variables.
Explainable Machine Learning Models SHAP-based for Feature Importance Affecting Stunting Prevalence Asysta Amalia Pasaribu; Nur Fitriyani Sahamony; Khairil Anwar Notodiputro; Bagus Sartono
ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026): ComTech
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/comtech.v17i1.13732

Abstract

Stunting is a form of chronic nutritional deficiency in toddlers and remains a major public health concern due to its impact on child growth and development. Efforts to reduce its prevalence continue to be strengthened in Indonesia, particularly in Sumatra Province. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of a logistic regression model and three machine learning models—decision tree, random forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—in classifying stunting prevalence. The response variable is the prevalence of stunting among toddlers and is categorized into two classes: exceeding the national target and not exceeding it, based on the 2024 national threshold. Although classification models can provide accurate predictions, they often lack interpretability. Therefore, this study applies the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to the best-performing machine learning model to identify the key factors influencing stunting. The use of Shapley values is justified through the uniqueness theorem, which establishes it as the only attribution method that satisfies desirable fairness properties. SHAP values explain the model by referencing both the trained model and the underlying data. The results show that the random forest model achieves the highest accuracy (90.00%) and outperforms the other models. SHAP analysis reveals that Underweight is the most influential predictor contributing to stunting prevalence in Sumatra Province. These findings highlight the importance of machine learning interpretability in supporting policy decisions to reduce stunting.