Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Daulat Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Nusantara: Journal Law and Islamic Law
Iwan Erar Joesoef
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jakarta
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Legal Liability for Copyright Infringement of Video Content Uploaded by Malaysian Individuals for Commercial Purposes on TikTok Risca Selfeny; Muthia Sakti; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Nusantara: Journal of Law and Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law and Islamic Law
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/nusantara.v1i2.183

Abstract

The rapid evolution of digital technology, specifically the TikTok platform, has precipitated a surge in unauthorized use and modification of video content for cross-border commercial exploitation, as exemplified by the legal dispute between dr. Leo and various Indonesian content creators. This research aims to analyze the specific legal sanctions for digital copyright infringement and to formulate a prescriptive application of Article 5 of Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright to ensure legal certainty for creators. Utilizing a normative juridical research method with statutory and case-based approaches, this study examines national positive laws alongside international legal instruments, including the Berne Convention and the WIPO Copyright Treaty. The findings demonstrate that unauthorized modification constitutes a breach of both moral and economic rights, punishable by criminal, civil, and administrative sanctions. Nevertheless, enforcement remains hindered by jurisdictional complexities and suboptimal Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) frameworks between Indonesia and Malaysia. Ultimately, this research concludes that a rigorous application of Article 5, bolstered by enhanced international cooperation and digital platform accountability, is imperative to safeguard intellectual integrity and ensure justice for creators in the digital age.
The Principle of Good Faith In The Filing of A Bankruptcy Application by A Separated Creditor Against A Debtor (Case Study Of Supreme Court Decision Number 1434 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020) Ariansyah Kurniawan; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Atik Winanti
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3496

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the principle of good faith in the submission of bankruptcy petitions by secured creditors against debtors, as set forth in Supreme Court Decision Number 1434 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020 and assess the judge's considerations in distinguishing the use of legitimate rights from abuse of authority by comparing it with Supreme Court Decisions Number 704 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2018 and Number 1230 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019. This study employs a juridical normative method under case and statutory approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, which are analyzed qualitatively through the interpretation of legal principles, doctrines, and the ratio decidendi of the decision. The results indicate that the Supreme Court considers the bankruptcy petition by secured creditors in Decision Number 1434 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020 does not violate the principle of good faith because it is submitted to protect the legal interests of collateral whose economic value is threatened. Conversely, in Decisions No. 704 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2018 and No. 1230 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2019, the bankruptcy petition was rejected because it was deemed disproportionate and potentially pressured the debtor. The study formulates an ideal model for a bankruptcy petition by secured creditors that emphasizes collateral protection, does not involve abuse of rights, and is preceded by alternative resolution efforts. This model reflects the principles of balance, appropriateness, and the objective of bankruptcy law to protect the interests of both creditors and debtors fairly and proportionally in the current bankruptcy court practice in Indonesia, and contributes to development.
Legal Synchronization of Bankruptcy Asset Distribution: Prioritizing Workers Over State Taxes (An Analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 67/PUU-XI/2013 Regarding the Position of Workers and State Taxes in Bankruptcy Asset Distribution) Andre Rizaldy; Muthia Sakti; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i2.194

Abstract

This study examines the legal conflict between workers' wage claims and state tax obligations in bankruptcy proceedings under Indonesian law, focusing on the constitutional imperative to prioritize workers' rights. The Introduction contextualizes the tension between Article 95(4) of the Labor Law, which mandates wage prioritization, and tax legislation granting precedence to state claims, highlighting the landmark Constitutional Court Decision No. 67/PUU-XI/2013 that affirmed workers' constitutional rights to timely wages. Employing a Method of normative legal research, the analysis integrates statutory and case approaches, reviewing laws on bankruptcy (UU No. 37/2004), labor rights, and taxation, alongside judicial decisions and international frameworks like ILO Conventions No. 100 and 111. Results reveal that while the Constitutional Court’s decision established workers’ absolute priority over tax claims, regulatory disharmony persists due to conflicting provisions in the Tax Law (UU KUP) and the 2020 Job Creation Law (UU Cipta Kerja), which ambiguously subordinates tax claims only to secured creditors. Discussion underscores the necessity for legal synchronization to align labor and tax regulations, ensuring compliance with Gustav Radbruch’s principles of legal certainty and Hans Kelsen’s normative hierarchy. The study advocates legislative reforms to codify workers’ priority in bankruptcy, drawing parallels with Malaysia’s Employment Act 1955 and France’s AGS system, which institutionalize wage protection. By addressing regulatory contradictions, Indonesia can harmonize constitutional mandates with fiscal policies, balancing social justice and economic stability.
Legal Standing of Employees as Individual Creditors in Filing for Bankruptcy of State-Owned Enterprises Sumayya Muttaqin; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48972

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal standing of employees as individual creditors in filing for bankruptcy against State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), with a focus on the case study of PT Merpati Nusantara Airlines (Persero) as stated in Cassation Decision Number 447 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2016. This study was motivated by legal uncertainty regarding the rights of employees to file for bankruptcy against SOEs, even though they normatively meet the bankruptcy requirements as stipulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU. The research method used was normative juridical with a legislative approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. Data was obtained through literature study and analyzed qualitatively deductively to examine the conformity of the judge's considerations with the provisions of Law Number 19 of 2003 concerning SOEs, Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation, as well as the principles of justice and legal certainty. The results of the study show that the judge's considerations in rejecting the bankruptcy petition by employees are not fully in line with the provisions of the legislation, because PT Merpati has the status of a state-owned enterprise that is subject to private law and should be able to be declared bankrupt by creditors, including employees. However, the judge interpreted that Merpati's status as a state-owned enterprise with a public function prevented the bankruptcy process, which ultimately weakened the protection of workers' rights. The novelty of this research lies in emphasizing the importance of separating the public and commercial functions of SOEs and the need for consistent interpretation guidelines for judges in order to create substantive justice and legal certainty in future SOE bankruptcy cases.
The Urgency Of Applying The Principle Of "Debt Forgiveness" For Individual Debtors Of MSME Owners In The Bankruptcy Process Ayzza Rachma Zahranisza; Iwan Erar Joesoef
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 12, No 1 (2026): Volume 11, Number 1 January-March 2026
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v12i1.12925

Abstract

Abstract Individual debtors, especially MSME owners, are often trapped in bankruptcy situations that cannot be resolved due to insufficient assets to pay outstanding debts to creditors. Substantially, this debt burden persistently shackles individual debtors. Damage to their financial reputation, coupled with the possibility of future lawsuits, significantly limits their ability to regain a decent economic life after the bankruptcy process is completed. The purpose of this study is to analyze the urgency of applying the principle of “debt forgiveness” that can provide justice for debtors and creditors in the bankruptcy process, especially for individual debtors who own MSMEs. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach and a regulatory approach using secondary data sources. The results of the study indicate that in order to achieve a balance between debtors and creditors, needs to be a mechanism for applying the principle of “debt forgiveness” that provides relief for debtors to be able to write off all or part of their remaining debt, which can be proven by good faith and the limited financial capacity of debtors who have remaining debt from the failure of their MSME. This will provide debtors with the opportunity to rebuild their economic lives without constantly being overshadowed by the demands of past outstanding debts. Keywords: The Principle of “Debt Forgiveness”, Individual Debtors, MSME Owners, Bankruptcy.
Co-Authors Andre Rizaldy Ariansyah Kurniawan Atik Winanti Ayzza Rachma Zahranisza Muthia Sakti Risca Selfeny Sumayya Muttaqin