Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Revitalizing Constitutional Law Learning through a Problem-Based Learning Approach in Legal Education Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Syahid Akhmad Faisol; Tevan Agus Setiawan; Firyal Nurul Badriyah; Anisa Deny Setiawati; Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya; Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma
Realism: Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v3i3.126

Abstract

Textbooks are a crucial component in higher education as primary learning resources that support conceptual understanding and analytical skills. In legal education, their role extends to shaping systematic and critical legal reasoning. However, the availability of textbooks aligned with the Semester Learning Plan (RPS) remains limited, particularly in Constitutional Law courses, resulting in fragmented and less contextual learning experiences. This study aims to develop and test a Problem-Based Learning (PBL)-based Constitutional Law textbook integrated with legal protection and human rights perspectives. The research employs an experimental design by implementing a prototype textbook in the Undergraduate Law Program, Campus 5, State University of Surabaya, and collecting feedback from students and experts. The results indicate that the developed textbook enhances students' critical thinking, analytical skills, and understanding of constitutional issues, especially those related to legal protection and human rights. The PBL approach encourages active learning through case analysis and problem-solving activities, making the learning process more contextual and participatory. This study contributes both theoretically and practically to the development of innovative, adaptive, and context-based legal education materials that support academic competitiveness.
Protection of Disability in the World of Work Through Law Number 8 of 2016 Sherly Putri Nurhayati; Firyal Nurul Badriyah; Ayunda Firdaningrum; Nabila Amalia Maulida; Eny Faizah Mumtazah; Vira Giatyffany Harmako; Ayu Ajeng Pamungkas
Disable Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Disable: Law Review
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/disable.v1i1.40360

Abstract

Persons with disabilities in Indonesia continue to face numerous obstacles in accessing decent employment, despite the enactment of legal protections such as Law Number 8 of 2016, which is intended to safeguard their rights. Although this regulation is intended to serve as a strong foundation for promoting equality in the labor market, its implementation has not yet met expectations. Findings from this study indicate that the policy's implementation remains suboptimal due to weak institutional oversight, limited employer awareness of the capabilities of persons with disabilities, inadequate workplace accessibility, insufficient dissemination of disability rights, lack of incentives for inclusive employers, and the scarcity of necessary support facilities. These issues were identified through legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches involving both primary legal materials and relevant secondary sources. To foster equal employment opportunities, strategic measures are needed, such as strengthening labor supervision systems, offering fiscal incentives to inclusive companies, improving the physical accessibility of work environments, and providing comprehensive job training programs tailored for persons with disabilities
Fragmentation of Authority in Mineral and Mineral Mining Licensing based on a Prismatic Legal Perspective Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma; Firyal Nurul Badriyah; Lathisa Nazwa Shalsabila Azzahra; Amalina Ahmad Tajudin
Pamulang Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Prodi Hukum S1 - Fakultas Hukum - Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/palrev.v9i1.61551

Abstract

The governance of mineral and coal mining licensing in Indonesia shows that there is a tension between decentralization and centralization policies in state administrative law. After the amendment of the Mineral and Coal Law and the enactment of the Regional Government Law, the authority of mining licensing has undergone a significant shift from the local government to the central government. These changes have resulted in fragmentation of authority, disharmonization of regulations, unclear institutional coordination, and problems of legal certainty in national mining governance. This study aims to analyze the fragmentation of authority in mineral and mineral mining licensing based on the perspective of state administrative law and Fred W. Riggs' prismatic legal theory. This research is a normative legal research. The results of the study show that the centralization of mining licensing authority has not completely solved the governance problem, but has instead given birth to a new form of institutional fragmentation and administrative dualism. A prismatic legal perspective shows that Indonesia's mining governance shows the character of a transitional society characterized by the coexistence between modern law and patrimonial bureaucratic culture. This study found that the disharmonization of the distribution of authority leads to legal uncertainty, weak supervision, and decreased regional participation in natural resource management. The novelty of the research lies in the use of prismatic legal theory as a framework for analysis of the fragmentation of mining licensing authority in Indonesia.
Resentralisasi Kewenangan Perizinan Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara dalam Perspektif Hukum Profetik Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma; Firyal Nurul Badriyah; Lathisa Nazwa Shalsabila Azzahra
Siyasah Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Siyasah Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara
Publisher : UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/pe82js29

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal politics of recentralization of mineral and coal mining licensing in Indonesia from a prophetic legal perspective. The urgency of this research arises from the increasing agrarian conflicts, environmental damage, and uneven distribution of economic benefits, which show weaknesses in mining governance in both the decentralized and post-centralization eras. The amendment through Law Number 3 of 2020 marks a shift of authority from the local government to the central government, which aims to improve governance, but creates new problems related to participation and justice. This study aims to analyze the legal politics of the recentralization of mineral and coal mining licensing and evaluate it from the perspective of prophetic law, which includes the values of humanization, liberation, and transcendence. The method used is normative juridical with a legal and conceptual approach. The results show that recentralization strengthens state control and increases administrative efficiency, but has not been able to guarantee substantive justice due to limited public participation, unequal distribution of benefits, and weak environmental protection. From the perspective of prophetic law, these policies do not fully reflect the values of humanization, liberation, and transcendence. The novelty of this research lies in the use of prophetic law as an analytical framework in the legal politics of natural resources, which was previously mainly studied through political economy or administrative governance approaches. The study also proposes a reconstruction of legal politics through a participatory decentralization model based on prophetic values, a synthesis between centralization and decentralization. This model is expected to achieve fairer, more inclusive, and sustainable mining governance.