Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Realism: Law Review
Tevan Agus Setiawan
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Revitalizing Constitutional Law Learning through a Problem-Based Learning Approach in Legal Education Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan; Syahid Akhmad Faisol; Tevan Agus Setiawan; Firyal Nurul Badriyah; Anisa Deny Setiawati; Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya; Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma
Realism: Law Review Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): Realism: Law Review
Publisher : Sabtida

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71250/rlr.v3i3.126

Abstract

Textbooks are a crucial component in higher education as primary learning resources that support conceptual understanding and analytical skills. In legal education, their role extends to shaping systematic and critical legal reasoning. However, the availability of textbooks aligned with the Semester Learning Plan (RPS) remains limited, particularly in Constitutional Law courses, resulting in fragmented and less contextual learning experiences. This study aims to develop and test a Problem-Based Learning (PBL)-based Constitutional Law textbook integrated with legal protection and human rights perspectives. The research employs an experimental design by implementing a prototype textbook in the Undergraduate Law Program, Campus 5, State University of Surabaya, and collecting feedback from students and experts. The results indicate that the developed textbook enhances students' critical thinking, analytical skills, and understanding of constitutional issues, especially those related to legal protection and human rights. The PBL approach encourages active learning through case analysis and problem-solving activities, making the learning process more contextual and participatory. This study contributes both theoretically and practically to the development of innovative, adaptive, and context-based legal education materials that support academic competitiveness.
Implikasi Frasa ‘Masih Ada’ Pasal 3 Uupa bagi Pengakuan Masyarakat Adat dan Kebijakan “Ius Constituendum” Ilham Muhammad Zain; Aab Abdul Jamalul Lael; Khoirul Abdul Aziz; Tevan Agus Setiawan; Exsyel Hendy Basuki; Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 3 (2026): Tema Hukum Adat dan Kebiasaan
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v7i3.3067

Abstract

The phrase "sepanjang menurut kenyataannya masih ada" in Article 3 of the UUPA creates normative ambiguity that places indigenous peoples in a vulnerable position. This study aims to analyze the juridical implications of the phrase and formulate ius constituendum policies. The discussion results indicate that this phrase is a transitional arrangement resulting in sectoral regulatory fragmentation and complex administrative burdens of proof for indigenous peoples. In conclusion, a paradigm shift from conditional to inherent recognition is required. Future policies must remove the phrase, adopt self-identification principles and harmonize regulations to ensure legal certainty and justice for indigenous peoples.
Co-Authors Aab Abdul Jamalul Lael Aditya Wiguna Sanjaya Anisa Deny Setiawati Exsyel Hendy Basuki Febrian Indar Surya Kusuma Firyal Nurul Badriyah Hezron Sabar Rotua Tinambunan Ilham Muhammad Zain Khoirul Abdul Aziz Syahid Akhmad Faisol