Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sahaja : Journal Sharia and Humanities Al Hukm: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies
Nasywa Nidaul Azmi
Universitas Darunnajah
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
The Relationship Between Revelation and Reason in Islam: An Integrative Framework for Knowledge Construction and Worldview Formation Nasywa Nidaul Azmi; Laila Zaqiyah; Hamdan Hasibuan; Muzanah; Salim Haji; Mustakim; Muhammad Fahrul
Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Sahaja: Journal Sharia and Humanities
Publisher : Universitas Darunnajah Jakarta, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61159/sahaja.v5i1.657

Abstract

This study examines the integrative relationship between revelation (wahy) and reason (‘aql) in Islamic epistemology, with particular emphasis on how their synthesis constructs a coherent worldview and influences Muslim intellectual, social, economic, and spiritual life. Employing a qualitative content analysis approach grounded in library research methodology, this study systematically analyzed primary Islamic sources, the Qur’an and Hadith, alongside classical and contemporary scholarly literature, including works by Ibn Rushd, Ibn Taymiyyah, al-Ghazali, and al-Attas. Thematic analysis was conducted through a three-stage coding process involving open coding, axial coding, and selective coding to identify recurring patterns in the discourse on revelation-reason integration. The findings reveal four principal themes: (1) the epistemological complementarity of revelation and reason as articulated in classical Islamic philosophy; (2) conceptual models of knowledge integration that bridge divine guidance with rational inquiry; (3) persistent challenges in operationalizing this integration within contemporary educational and institutional contexts; and (4) the multidimensional impact of this integration on social cohesion, economic ethics, and spiritual consciousness. This study contributes to the existing literature by proposing a systematic integrative framework that positions revelation and reason not as competing epistemic authorities but as synergistic sources of knowledge essential for addressing contemporary challenges of secularism, materialism, and moral fragmentation.
Regulating the Unregulated: Legal Gaps in Green Finance, Light Pollution, and Surrogacy Under Civil Law Frameworks Nasywa Nidaul Azmi; Mazaya Luthfillah
Al Hukm: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies Vol. 1 No. 01: Al Hukm: Journal of Islamic Legal Studies (June 2026)
Publisher : Cv. Kayaswara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid evolution of global socio-economic and environmental realities has outpaced the development of civil law frameworks in several critical domains. This article examines three distinct yet interconnected areas of legal underregulation: green finance, light pollution, and surrogacy. Through a doctrinal legal analysis complemented by a comparative law approach, this study identifies the structural deficiencies in existing civil law systems that leave these domains inadequately governed. In the realm of green finance, the absence of standardized taxonomies and enforceable obligations creates opportunities for greenwashing and undermines sustainable development goals. Regarding light pollution, the lack of recognition as a legally cognizable harm within civil liability frameworks leaves affected communities without meaningful remedies. In the case of surrogacy, inconsistent legal treatment across jurisdictions generates conflicts of law, particularly concerning the legal parentage and citizenship of children born through surrogacy arrangements. This article argues that the traditional principles of civil law, including the doctrines of nuisance, contractual freedom, and parental rights, require substantial reinterpretation and legislative reform to address these contemporary challenges. The study proposes a unified regulatory framework grounded in civil law principles that can accommodate the unique characteristics of each domain while maintaining internal coherence.
Co-Authors Hamdan Hasibuan Laila Zaqiyah Mazaya Luthfillah Muhammad Fahrul Mustakim Muzanah Salim Haji