Sonya Ade Putri
Universitas Tanjungpura

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Writing Effectiveness: A Case Study of UNTAN Students Henny Sanulita; Khairullah Khairullah; Agus Wartiningsih; Sonya Ade Putri
Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran
Publisher : Bale Literasi: Lembaga Riset, Pelatihan & Edukasi, Sosial, Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/alinea.v6i2.2758

Abstract

Academic writing is a critical competency in higher education, yet many university students struggle to produce coherent and academically rigorous written work. This challenge is particularly pronounced in Indonesian higher education, where metacognitive writing strategy instruction remains empirically underexplored. This study aimed to analyze the use of metacognitive strategies among university students and examine their relationship with academic writing effectiveness in the Indonesian Language General Compulsory Course (MKWK Bahasa Indonesia) at Tanjungpura University (UNTAN), Indonesia. Deploying a quantitative survey design, data were gathered from a heterogeneous sample of undergraduate students across multiple faculties, including Law, Early Childhood Teacher Education (PAUD), Guidance and Counseling (BK), and Agriculture. Metacognitive strategies were operationalized through planning, monitoring, and evaluation components, while writing effectiveness was measured across five dimensions: structure, coherence, language accuracy, argumentative strength, and reference completeness. Data were analyzed using non-parametric statistics via Spearman's rank correlation. Results indicated that students'reported metacognitive strategy usage was at a moderate level, with mean scores surpassing the theoretical midpoint. A significant and strong positive correlation was found between metacognitive strategy use and self-perceived academic writing effectiveness (r= 0.7551, p< 0.000001). Descriptively, planning and monitoring dimensions displayed a stronger association with writing quality compared to the evaluation phase. The simple linear regression model revealed that metacognitive strategies shared 61.79% of the variance with perceived writing effectiveness, leaving the remaining variance linked to unmeasured individual and environmental factors. These findings suggest that the strategic integration of metacognitive scaffolding into writing curricula is highly relevant for fostering scholarly writing competence within linguistically and academically diverse higher education contexts.
Developing Short-Story Writing Materials Based on Strategy-Based Instruction (SBI) for Indonesian Language Education Students Antonius Totok Pryadi; Khairullah Khairullah; Sonya Ade Putri
Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Alinea: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajaran
Publisher : Bale Literasi: Lembaga Riset, Pelatihan & Edukasi, Sosial, Publikasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/alinea.v6i1.2407

Abstract

The limited availability of teaching materials that integrate systematic techniques for idea and plot development remains a major obstacle for students in achieving the competency standards of the Creative Writing course. This research aims to develop short story writing materials by integrating the Strategy-Based Instruction (SBI) framework. The method employed is Research and Development (R&D) utilizing the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The teaching materials were constructed by synergizing cognitive and metacognitive strategy stages, including strategy identification, modeling, guided practice, and independent writing. Research subjects involved expert validators, a course lecturer, and 28 Indonesian Language Education students at Tanjungpura University. Validation results from material, language, and design experts showed very high average scores (3.88–4.00). Practicality tests on both limited and field scales categorized the materials as highly practical (3.46–3.72). Furthermore, pretest and posttest results (sig. 0.001) significantly proved that these materials are effective in improving students' ability to construct the intrinsic elements of short stories structurally. These findings contribute to a more systematic creative writing instructional model through the reinforcement of procedural strategies for novice writers in higher education.
Kroni Prabowo Dalam Proyek Makan Bergizi Gratis Narasi Media Bocor Alus Politik: Kajian Wacana Kritis Sonya Ade Putri; Patriantoro Patriantoro
JLA (Jurnal Lingua Applicata) Vol 9, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : DBSMB, Vocational College of Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jla.106559

Abstract

Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) merupakan kebijakan pemerintah untuk mengatasi masalah gizi anak Indonesia, namun pelaksanaannya menuai kontroversi karena dugaan kronisme politik. Penelitian ini menganalisis narasi kronisme dalam video “Kroni Prabowo dalam Proyek MBG” di kanal YouTube Bocor Alus Politik Tempo dengan pendekatan Analisis Wacana Kritis Teun A. van Dijk. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa media alternatif membongkar relasi kuasa dan ideologi tersembunyi melalui tiga dimensi: struktur teks (tema kronisme, narasi investigatif, dan diksi seperti “kroni” dan “KKN”), kognisi sosial (opini kritis dan sikap anti-kronisme), serta konteks sosial (MBG sebagai alat konsolidasi politik). Temuan ini menyoroti bagaimana framing media membentuk opini publik dengan mengangkat isu ketimpangan akses, konflik kepentingan, dan potensi korupsi, serta menegaskan peran media alternatif dalam mengkritisi kebijakan pemerintah di era digital. Kata kunci: Analisis Wacana Kritis, Van Dijk, kronisme politik, MBG, media alternatif, Bocor Alus Politik.