Raihan Nasir
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Integrating Maqāṣid al-Shariah, ESG, and Halālan Ṭayyiban in Indonesia: A TCCM-Based Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis Azy Athoillah Yazid; Moch Mahsun; Raihan Nasir
Lan Tabur: JURNAL EKONOMI SYARIAH Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): (March)
Publisher : LAN TABUR: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah The Islamic University of KH. Achmad Muzakki Syah Jember, East Java. Jember Jln. Manggar Gebang Poreng 139A Patrang Jember Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/lt.v7i2.182

Abstract

Introduction: This study maps the intellectual landscape of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) integration within the Indonesian economic and financial markets to establish a comprehensive halālan ṭayyiban ecosystem. Methods: A framework-based systematic literature review was conducted using the Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Method (TCCM) approach, combined with bibliometric analysis via R to examine halal-ESG-sustainability literature published between 2014 and 2025. Results: The findings reveal that existing literature predominantly focuses on normative-legal and compliance aspects, particularly halal certification, while operational environmental sustainability and halal-ecology integration remain underexplored. This thematic polarization indicates that extensive research is currently directed towards conceptual legitimacy, implementation, measurement, and institutional structures, which ultimately facilitates systemic integration. Consequently, this study formulates a theoretical model integrating Maqāṣid, ESG, and Halālan Ṭayyiban principles to synthesize inter-dimensional relationships, empirical findings, and implementation indicators. Conclusion and suggestion: Practically, the results highlight a critical need to transition from administrative compliance to operational capacity-building, particularly concerning Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), system governance, and infrastructure traceability. To bridge the gap between normative frameworks and practical alignment, future research must prioritize integrated performance indicators, implementative intervention designs, and cross-national comparative studies, thereby addressing current limitations regarding corpus metadata dependency and exploratory projections.
Reinterpreting qiwāmah in Qur’an 4:34: Integrating critical hermeneutics and maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah for gender justice Ihya' Ulumudin; Aswadi Aswadi; Abu Bakar; Faiqotul Mala; Moch. Mahsun; Raihan Nasir
An-Nisa’ Journal of Gender Studies Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Service, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, East Java, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/an-nisa.v19i1.465

Abstract

This study examines the interpretation of QS. An-Nisā’ [4]:34, particularly the concept of qiwāmah, and its implications for gender relations in Muslim societies. It seeks to address the tension between classical hierarchical interpretations and contemporary reformist interpretations oriented toward gender justice. Using a qualitative approach, this study integrates comparative exegetical analysis, Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd’s critical hermeneutics, and Jasser Auda’s framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. The analysis focuses on Tafsīr Ibn Kathir and Tafsīr al-Manār as representations of classical and reformist exegetical paradigms. The findings reveal a significant transformation in the interpretation of qiwāmah, from male authority and hierarchical leadership toward ethical responsibility and relational accountability. Similar shifts are also found in the reinterpretation of nushūz and ḍaraba, reflecting a stronger emphasis on justice, human dignity, and the prevention of harm. The hermeneutical analysis shows that both interpretations are shaped by their respective socio-historical contexts, while the maqāṣid-based evaluation indicates that neither paradigm fully satisfies the demands of contemporary gender justice. Based on these findings, this study reconstructs qiwāmah as an ethical-relational responsibility grounded in justice, human dignity, mutual accountability, and non-violence. The originality of this study lies in integrating comparative exegetical analysis, critical hermeneutics, and maqāṣid-based evaluation into a unified framework for reinterpreting qiwāmah and advancing gender justice in contemporary Islamic thought.