Raihan Nasir
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Integrating Maqāṣid al-Shariah, ESG, and Halālan Ṭayyiban in Indonesia: A TCCM-Based Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis Azy Athoillah Yazid; Moch Mahsun; Raihan Nasir
Lan Tabur: JURNAL EKONOMI SYARIAH Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): March
Publisher : LAN TABUR: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah The Islamic University of KH. Achmad Muzakki Syah Jember, East Java. Jember Jln. Manggar Gebang Poreng 139A Patrang Jember Jawa Timur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/lt.v7i2.182

Abstract

Introduction: This study maps the intellectual landscape of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) integration within the Indonesian economic and financial markets to establish a comprehensive halālan ṭayyiban ecosystem. Methods: A framework-based systematic literature review was conducted using the Theory, Context, Characteristics, and Method (TCCM) approach, combined with bibliometric analysis via R to examine halal-ESG-sustainability literature published between 2014 and 2025. Results: The findings reveal that existing literature predominantly focuses on normative-legal and compliance aspects, particularly halal certification, while operational environmental sustainability and halal-ecology integration remain underexplored. This thematic polarization indicates that extensive research is currently directed towards conceptual legitimacy, implementation, measurement, and institutional structures, which ultimately facilitates systemic integration. Consequently, this study formulates a theoretical model integrating Maqāṣid, ESG, and Halālan Ṭayyiban principles to synthesize inter-dimensional relationships, empirical findings, and implementation indicators. Conclusion and suggestion: Practically, the results highlight a critical need to transition from administrative compliance to operational capacity-building, particularly concerning Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), system governance, and infrastructure traceability. To bridge the gap between normative frameworks and practical alignment, future research must prioritize integrated performance indicators, implementative intervention designs, and cross-national comparative studies, thereby addressing current limitations regarding corpus metadata dependency and exploratory projections.
Reinterpreting qiwāmah in Qur’an 4:34: Integrating critical hermeneutics and maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah for gender justice Ihya' Ulumudin; Aswadi Aswadi; Abu Bakar; Faiqotul Mala; Moch. Mahsun; Raihan Nasir
An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies Vol. 19 No. 1 (2026): An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Service, Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, East Java, Indonesia.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/an-nisa.v19i1.465

Abstract

Interpretations of qiwāmah in Qur’an 4:34 remain divided between classical and reformist readings, both retaining male leadership hierarchies that raise concerns about gender justice, women’s dignity, and violence in family relations. This study compares qiwāmah, nushūz, and ḍaraba in Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr and Tafsīr al-Manār, examines their sociohistorical and epistemological foundations through Abu Zayd’s critical hermeneutics, evaluates their ethical implications using Auda’s systems-based maqāṣid approach, and reconstructs qiwāmah to support gender justice. Using qualitative library research, it integrates comparative exegesis, critical hermeneutics, and maqāṣid-based evaluation of justice, human dignity, and harm prevention. Four findings emerge. First, classical exegesis emphasizes hierarchical authority, whereas reformist exegesis stresses functional responsibility, a more relational understanding of nushūz, and restrictions on physical acts associated with ḍaraba. Second, these differences reflect distinct sociohistorical contexts and epistemological assumptions. Third, neither interpretation fully satisfies maqāṣid principles of justice, dignity, and harm prevention. Fourth, integrated analysis yields an ethical-relational model of qiwāmah grounded in ethical competence, mutual accountability, and nonviolence. The study concludes that shifting from hierarchy toward responsibility does not eliminate normative male leadership; gender justice therefore requires reconstructing family authority around ethical competence, shared responsibility, and nonviolence. The study offers practical implications for developing Qur’anic interpretation modules, training religious counselors, and strengthening family counseling through consultation and nonviolent conflict resolution, subject to empirical validation before institutional adoption. .