Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Exploring critical literacy of elementary school teacher education students through semantic studies Nanda Veruna Enun Kharisma; Yunita Miftahul Jannah
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i9.644

Abstract

Developing critical literacy is crucial for elementary school teacher education students to understand texts beyond their literal meanings. This study aimed to describe students' critical literacy skills in interpreting texts from a semantic perspective. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected from text analysis assignments and class presentations of 30 students and analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicate that students performed well in identifying denotative meanings, demonstrated moderate ability in interpreting connotative meanings and synonymy/antonymy relationships, but struggled with hyponymy/polysemy relationships and ideological or contextual reflection. These results suggest that students are more adept at understanding literal meanings than at interpreting implicit or contextual meanings. This study highlights the importance of explicitly integrating semantic studies into teacher education programs to strengthen prospective teachers' critical literacy, particularly in analyzing complex meaning relationships and the ideological dimensions of texts.
Morphological Errors in Everyday Life: A Portrait of Critical Literacy of Elementary School Teacher Candidates to Support Quality Education Nanda Veruna Enun Kharisma; Dhesta Youlandi Rahayu Sulistiyawati
Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dasar : Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Vol. 12 No.1 Februari 2026
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jrpd.v12n1.p69-80

Abstract

This study aims to analyze morphological errors in everyday Indonesian language use and to examine how prospective elementary school teachers employ these errors as a medium for practicing critical literacy skills in alignment with SDG 4 on quality education. Employing a descriptive qualitative design, data were collected from 30 students through 200 everyday texts (e.g., banners, social media posts, and student notes), analytical tasks, and 10 semi-structured interviews. A total of 87 instances of morphological errors were identified and classified into affixation (52%), reduplication (29%), and composition (19%). Critical literacy skills were assessed using a rubric consisting of five indicators: identification, analysis, evaluation, reflection, and transformation. Findings revealed that most students achieved high performance in identification (90%) and analysis (75%), while lower performance was observed in reflection (60%) and transformation (55%). These results indicate that although students are capable of detecting and analyzing morphological errors, they require further pedagogical support to strengthen reflective and transformative practices. The study highlights the pedagogical potential of integrating morphological error analysis into language education as a concrete strategy for developing critical literacy and supporting the objectives of SDG 4.
Optimalisasi Literasi Kritis Calon Guru MI dalam Mengantisipasi Hoaks di Era Digital Nanda Veruna Enun Kharisma; Yunita Miftahul Jannah; Ika Febriana Wati; Rinda Angghita Putri
SUBAKTYA: UNPAR COMMUNITY SERVICE JOURNAL Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): (JULI 2026) SUBAKTYA: UNPAR Community Service Journal
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26593/sucsj.v3i1.10193.29-42

Abstract

Era digital membawa kemudahan dalam mengakses informasi, namun juga menuntut kemampuan literasi kritis agar masyarakat mampu menyaring, mengevaluasi, dan memanfaatkan informasi secara bijak. Kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konseptual, keterampilan praktis, dan perubahan sikap mahasiswa dalam menyikapi informasi digital melalui pendampingan literasi kritis. Kegiatan dilaksanakan di Institut Al Azhar Menganti Gresik dan diikuti oleh 40 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (PGMI) semester 4–6. Metode pelaksanaan menggunakan pendekatan partisipatif dengan tiga tahapan utama, yaitu: (1) pemberian materi mengenai literasi kritis, (2) diskusi interaktif berbasis studi kasus, dan (3) praktik analisis konten digital. Instrumen evaluasi meliputi pre-test dan post-test, lembar observasi, serta angket kepuasan. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan peningkatan pemahaman peserta yang signifikan, dengan rata-rata nilai post-test meningkat 31,7% dibanding pre-test. Sebanyak 75% peserta berhasil mengidentifikasi unsur hoaks, bias media, dan manipulasi data dalam praktik analisis konten digital. Selain itu, terjadi perubahan sikap positif, dimana peserta menjadi lebih berhati-hati dalam menyebarkan informasi dan menyadari tanggung jawabnya sebagai warga digital. Evaluasi kepuasan menunjukkan 92% peserta menilai kegiatan ini bermanfaat dan relevan. Kegiatan ini berkontribusi dalam membangun budaya berpikir kritis di lingkungan akademik dan dapat menjadi model pendampingan serupa di institusi lain. The digital era facilitates easy access to information but also necessitates critical literacy skills, enabling the public to filter, evaluate, and utilize information wisely. This community service initiative aimed to enhance conceptual understanding and practical skills, as well as foster positive attitude changes among university students regarding digital information through critical literacy guidance. The activity was conducted at Institut Al Azhar Menganti, Gresik, involving 40 students from the Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (Islamic Primary School) Teacher Education or PGMI program (semesters 4–6). A participatory approach was employed, comprising three main stages: (1) the delivery of material on critical literacy, (2) interactive case-study-based discussions, and (3) practical digital content analysis. Evaluation instruments included pre- and post-tests, observation sheets, and satisfaction questionnaires. Results indicated a significant improvement in participants' understanding, with the average post-test score rising by 31.7% compared to the pre-test. Notably, 75% of participants successfully identified elements of hoaxes, media bias, and data manipulation during the digital content analysis exercises. Furthermore, a positive shift in attitude was observed; participants became more cautious about disseminating information and more aware of their responsibilities as digital citizens. Satisfaction evaluations revealed that 92% of participants considered the activity beneficial and relevant. This initiative contributes to fostering a culture of critical thinking within the academic environment and can serve as a model for similar guidance programs at other institutions.