Trisulo Trisulo
Politeknik Keuangan Negara STAN

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

COMPARISON OF FAMILY LAW SYSTEMS IN THE UNITED STATES, INDONESIA, AND FRANCE: A CASE STUDY OF MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE RULES Sofyan Mei Utama; Diana Farid; Trisulo Trisulo; Achmad Siddiq; Nahdia Nazmi
Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Vol 16, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31602/al-adl.v16i2.11261

Abstract

Family law systems in different countries significantly differ between marriage and divorce regulations. This research aims to compare the family law systems in several selected countries and analyze the marriage and divorce regulations in these countries. The research method used is qualitative with a case study approach. At the same time, primary and secondary data are obtained from literature studies where the retrieval process is from various trusted sources such as journals, books, and legal regulations. Data analysis uses descriptive analysis of research methods by collecting data after the actual data is compiled, processed, and analyzed to provide an overview of the existing problems. The results show that the selected countries, namely the United States, France, and Indonesia, have different marriage requirements, divorce proceedings, property division, and child custody regulations. An in-depth discussion of these differences provides a better understanding of the family law system in each country and its implications for individuals involved in the marriage and divorce process. This research concludes that comparing family law systems in different countries opens up room for developing better regulations to protect the interests of individuals and families in the context of marriage and divorce.
Strategi Bauran Pemasaran dalam Regulasi Penjualan Barang Milik Negara: Optimalisasi dan Tantangan Trisulo Trisulo; Budi Susilo
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 22, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2025
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v22i4.1564

Abstract

Barang Milik Negara (BMN) yang dilelang tidak selalu laku terjual pada kesempatan pertama. Ketidakberhasilan pada lelang pertama dapat saja berdampak semakin tidak ekonomisnya nilai BMN tersebut dikarenakan kondisi bisa semakin buruk/usang. Kondisi ini menimbulkan gagasan untuk menerapkan bauran pemasaran dalam regulasi agar penjualan BMN lebih optimal. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum, dengan tujuan menganalisis implementasi prinsip “secara ekonomis lebih menguntungkan bagi negara”, serta menganalisis bauran pemasaran menjadi aspek yang dapat dipertimbangkan dalam regulasi khususnya pada proses penjualan BMN. Penulisan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan hukum sekunder, diolah dan dianalisis secara kualitatif, diperkuat dengan pendapat narasumber ahli. Hasil penelitian mendapatkan bahwa 7 aspek bauran pemasaran (product, price, place, promotion, people, physical evidence, dan process) tidak bertentangan dengan prinsip “secara ekonomis lebih menguntungkan bagi negara”. Bauran pemasaran layak diterapkan dalam penjualan Barang Milik Negara untuk dihapuskan. Penjualan BMN dengan penerapan bauran pemasaran sesuai kaidah marketing diharapkan dapat meningkatkan potensi pendapatan negara, serta secara hukum lebih adaptif bagi masyarakat.