Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Logic and Language as Instruments of Scientific Thinking Nissa Media Utami; Ulayya Dhiya Ulhaq
Gunung Djati Conference Series Vol. 62 (2026): Education and Social Humanities Conference (ESHCo)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/gdcs.v62i.3323

Abstract

Logic and language are the two primary tools that enable humans to engage in scientific thinking. In scientific activities, both serve not only as aids to understand phenomena but also play a crucial role in organizing the reasoning process to be more structured and ensuring that ideas are conveyed clearly. Without their synergy, the reasoning process becomes prone to fallacies, and the outcomes of thought become difficult to verify. This study aims to explain the crucial roles of logic and language as instruments in the process of scientific thinking, as well as to analyze how both support the formation of rational and accountable knowledge. This research employs a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data collection techniques were conducted through library research. This approach was selected because the research focus is conceptual-philosophical in nature, requiring in-depth interpretation of texts and a synthesis of expert thought. The results indicate that logic functions as a regulator of consistency and validity in reasoning according to established rules, while language serves as the medium for the systematic transmission of thought. The two complement each other: logic ensures that the thinking process is free from rational defects, while language ensures that such knowledge can be understood and tested publicly. Furthermore, the discussion emphasizes that scientific language possesses three primary characteristics: informative, reproductive, and antiseptic. These three aspects guarantee objectivity and clarity in scientific communication. Mastery of logic and language is a fundamental foundation of scientific thinking. They are not merely technical means but epistemological pillars that shape how humans understand reality and produce knowledge responsibly.
Makna Ideasional pada Teks Video YouTube Guru Gembul “Cara Mengukur Kadar Intelektualitas Seseorang”: Analisis Linguistik Fungsional Sistemik Nissa Media Utami; Muhammad Aceng Tata; Rizzaldy Satria Wiwaha
JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA Vol. 16 No. 2 (2026): JURNAL PENDIDIKAN BAHASA
Publisher : STKIP Taman Siswa Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37630/jpb.v16i2.4669

Abstract

Bahasa dipandang sebagai sistem semiotik sosial yang memiliki tiga fungsi utama, yaitu fungsi ideasional, fungsi interpersonal, dan fungsi tekstual. Fungsi ideasional berkaitan dengan kemampuan bahasa untuk merepresentasikan pengalaman manusia, baik pengalaman yang bersifat fisik, mental, maupun sosial. Penelitian ini bermaksud mengetahui makna ideasional serta maksud yang terkandung dalam teks video yang berjudul cara mengukur kadar intelektualitas seseorang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode deskriptif untuk menganalisis makna ideasional dengan teknik pengumpulan data pustaka. Peneliti mengacu kepada teori yang dikemukakan oleh M.A.K Halliday yaitu Linguistik Fungsional Sistemik (LSF) berkaitan dengan makna ideasional. Terdapat enam jenis proses yaitu proses material, proses mental, proses verbal, proses perilaku, proses relasional dan proses eksistensial. Hasil dari penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa guru gembul lebih banyak menggunakan proses material dan proses mental. Penggunaan gaya bahasa menunjukkan strategi komunikasi yang argumentatif, retoris, dan reflektif untuk menyampaikan gagasan mengenai intelektualitas. Perpaduan tersebut membuat penyampaian materi menjadi lebih komunikatif, menarik, serta mendukung penyampaian makna ideasional dalam konten video.