Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PESHUM Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences
Dirwansyah Dirwansyah
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Perlindungan Whistleblower Narkotika Berbasis Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum Dirwansyah Dirwansyah; Muhamad Harun; K.A. Bukhori
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16008

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal protection for whistleblowers in narcotics criminal cases in Indonesia through the perspective of Islamic Constitutional Law (Siyāsah Shar‘iyyah) and the theory of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah. As an extraordinary crime, narcotics require active public participation, yet whistleblowers often face significant legal and physical risks. This normative legal research uses a statutory and conceptual approach to evaluate Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, Law No. 31 of 2014 on Witness and Victim Protection, and the 1945 Constitution. The results indicate a normative vacuum and regulatory fragmentation that fail to provide absolute immunity for whistleblowers. From an Islamic perspective, protecting whistleblowers is a constitutional-theological obligation to safeguard the five essential elements (al-darūriyyāt al-khamsah), particularly hifẓ al-nafs (protection of life) and hifẓ al-‘aql (protection of intellect). This study proposes a legal reconstruction that integrates constitutional principles with maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah to ensure comprehensive protection and legal certainty for those reporting narcotics crimes.
ENSURING HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLIANCE IN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING: LESSONS FROM INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICE Dirwansyah Dirwansyah; Cholidah Utama
Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences Vol 1, No 2 (2025): Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences
Publisher : Taksasila Edukasi Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71312/mrscholar.v1i2.555

Abstract

The protection of human rights in administrative decision making represents a crucial indicator of democratic governance and constitutional compliance. This study aims to examine the extent to which Indonesia’s administrative practices align with human rights principles as interpreted by the Constitutional Court. Using a qualitative juridical normative and analytical conceptual approach, the research analyzes Constitutional Court decisions, national legislation, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings reveal that while the Court has significantly contributed to embedding human rights norms into administrative law, its reasoning often oscillates between formalistic legality and substantive justice. Approximately 35% of the analyzed cases demonstrate progressive judicial reasoning that prioritizes proportionality and human dignity, while 45% remain confined to procedural legality. This dualism underscores the transitional nature of Indonesia’s constitutional adjudication toward a more rights-centered framework. The study concludes that sustainable human rights compliance requires stronger institutional mechanisms, inter agency coordination, and continuous human rights education for administrative officials.Keywords: administrative law, constitutional court, human rights, Indonesia, judicial reasoning
Co-Authors Cholidah Utama K.A. Bukhori Muhamad Harun