Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal PESHUM Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences
Cholidah Utama
Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Fatah Palembang
Humanities Education Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Tugas Kepala Desa Yang Diskriminatif Terhadap Perangkat Desa Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perspektif Fiqihsiyasah: Analisis Pasal 26 Huruf b, Pasal 49 Ayat (2), dan Pasal 53 UU Desa Leni Lawaty; Muhamad Harun; Muhamad Sadi Is; Cholidah Utama
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16005

Abstract

Kepala desa memiliki kewenangan strategis dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan desa, termasuk kewenangan mengangkat dan memberhentikan perangkat desa sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun2014 tentang Desa yang telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 3Tahun2024. Namun, dalam praktiknya kewenangan tersebut sering dijalankan secara diskriminatif dan tidak objektif. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tugas dan kewenangan kepala desa yang bersifat diskriminatif terhadap perangkat desa berdasarkan Pasal 26 huruf b, Pasal 49 ayat (2), dan Pasal 53 UU Desa, ditinjau dari perspektif hukum tata negara dan fiqih siyasah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan diskriminatif kepala desa merupakan bentuk penyalahgunaan kewenangan yang bertentangan dengan prinsip negara hukum berdasarkan demokrasi Pancasila serta nilai keadilan dan amanah dalam fiqih siyasah.
PROFESSIONALISM OF CIVIL SERVANTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: A QUALITATIVE STUDY OF GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA Ganta Pratama; Cholidah Utama
Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences Vol 2, No 1 (2026): Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences
Publisher : Taksasila Edukasi Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71312/mrscholar.v2i1.558

Abstract

Professionalism in the civil service is essential to ensure justice, accountability, and ethical governance within Indonesia’s administrative system. This study examines how professionalism serves as a bridge between law and ethics in the implementation of administrative law. The main objective is to explore civil servants’ perceptions, practices, and institutional challenges in applying administrative law through professional conduct. Using a qualitative descriptive approach with a case study method, data were collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and direct observation in selected government institutions. The findings reveal four key themes: the perception of professionalism as moral and legal responsibility, institutional barriers such as bureaucratic hierarchy and weak supervision, ethical and legal integration, and improved governance outcomes marked by higher accountability and reduced maladministration. The results demonstrate that professionalism mediates ethical behavior and legal compliance, reinforcing transparency and justice in public administration. This study contributes to refining Good Governance Theory and provides practical insights for developing professional, ethical, and accountable bureaucratic systems in Indonesia.Keywords: administrative law, ethics, governance, professionalism, public administration
ENSURING HUMAN RIGHTS COMPLIANCE IN ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION MAKING: LESSONS FROM INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL PRACTICE Dirwansyah Dirwansyah; Cholidah Utama
Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences Vol 1, No 2 (2025): Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences
Publisher : Taksasila Edukasi Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71312/mrscholar.v1i2.555

Abstract

The protection of human rights in administrative decision making represents a crucial indicator of democratic governance and constitutional compliance. This study aims to examine the extent to which Indonesia’s administrative practices align with human rights principles as interpreted by the Constitutional Court. Using a qualitative juridical normative and analytical conceptual approach, the research analyzes Constitutional Court decisions, national legislation, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings reveal that while the Court has significantly contributed to embedding human rights norms into administrative law, its reasoning often oscillates between formalistic legality and substantive justice. Approximately 35% of the analyzed cases demonstrate progressive judicial reasoning that prioritizes proportionality and human dignity, while 45% remain confined to procedural legality. This dualism underscores the transitional nature of Indonesia’s constitutional adjudication toward a more rights-centered framework. The study concludes that sustainable human rights compliance requires stronger institutional mechanisms, inter agency coordination, and continuous human rights education for administrative officials.Keywords: administrative law, constitutional court, human rights, Indonesia, judicial reasoning
BEYOND LEGALITY: REFRAMING ABUSE OF AUTHORITY THROUGH THE LENS OF UTILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Ade Rachmad Hidayat; Shexy Intan Pratama Sari; Cholidah Utama
Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences Vol 2, No 1 (2026): Multidisciplinary Research Studies in Social Sciences
Publisher : Taksasila Edukasi Insani

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71312/mrscholar.v2i1.557

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of authority abuse in public administration highlights the inadequacy of legality-based oversight systems in ensuring just and accountable governance. This study aims to reframe the understanding of administrative authority by integrating the principles of legality, utility, and accountability within the context of administrative law. Employing a qualitative design with doctrinal analysis, comparative case studies, and semi-structured interviews involving public officials, oversight bodies, and scholars, the research explores how these principles interact to prevent and evaluate abuse of authority. The findings reveal that administrative control in Indonesia remains heavily procedural, resulting in a persistent utility gap and accountability gap where decisions may be lawful but lack measurable public benefit. The study introduces a new conceptual framework Administrative Accountability Based on Utility which positions public value creation as a central criterion for legitimate authority. This model contributes theoretically by extending administrative justice beyond legality toward functional and ethical governance. Practically, it proposes institutional reforms such as impact-based audits and outcome-oriented accountability mechanisms. The research concludes that administrative legitimacy must derive not only from rule compliance but also from demonstrable social utility and answerability, paving the way for more responsible and value-driven governance systems.Keywords: accountability, administrative law, authority abuse, public value, utility
Co-Authors Ade Rachmad Hidayat Dirwansyah Dirwansyah Ganta Pratama Leni Lawaty Muhamad Harun Muhamad Sadi Is Shexy Intan Pratama Sari