Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Ilmuna: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam
Mudrikatul Arafah
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Revitalisasi Sunnah Dalam Pemikiran Dan Dakwah KH. Ali Mustafa Ya'qub Mudrikatul Arafah; Daud Rasyid; Muhibuddin
Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Kartika: Jurnal Studi Keislaman (Februari)
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Nahdlatul Ulama (LPT NU) PCNU Kabupaten Nganjuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59240/kjsk.v6i1.773

Abstract

The revitalization of the Sunnah has become a crucial issue in contemporary da’wah and hadith studies in Indonesia, particularly amid the widespread dissemination of fabricated (maudhu‘) hadiths through digital media that threaten religious authority and Muslim religious practices. This study examines the thought and da’wah of KH. Ali Mustafa Ya‘qub (1952–2016), a prominent Indonesian hadith scholar, in his effort to revitalize the Sunnah as a contextual yet authentic guide for life. Using a qualitative method with a literature study approach and content analysis of his major works, this research aims to address three questions: the concept of Sunnah revitalization according to Ya‘qub, the hadith criticism methodology he employed, and the relevance of his ideas to the challenges of da’wah in the digital era. The findings show that Ya‘qub constructed Sunnah revitalization upon four pillars of hadith scholarship (muṣṭalaḥ, takhrij, fiqh al-ḥadīth, and difā‘ ‘an al-ḥadīth) while integrating both sanad and matn criticism in a balanced manner. Its implementation appears in preaching, education, and digital engagement, making it relevant today
OTORITAS KEAGAMAAN DAN VALIDASI KONTEN ISLAMI: STUDI TENTANG LPBKI MUI DALAM MENDUKUNG DAKWAH DIGITAL Marhadi Muhayar; Indriya; Siti Nuri Nurhaidah; Maulavi Nawwaf Ubada; Mudrikatul Arafah
Ilmuna: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): in Press
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam STIT al Urwatul Wutsqo Bulurejo Jombang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54437/ilmuna.v8i2.3725

Abstract

The rapid growth of Islamic content on digital media raises a fundamental question of who holds the authority to determine the propriety of a religious message before it is disseminated to the public. Without an adequate validation mechanism, digital spaces risk being filled with content that deviates from basic Islamic principles yet still gains wide acceptance due to algorithmic and popularity-driven factors. This study aims to analyze the basis of religious authority underlying the legitimacy of the Institution for the Verification of Islamic Books and Content (LPBKI) of the Indonesian Ulema Council (MUI) and to examine the gatekeeping mechanism it performs in supporting the digital da'wah ecosystem. This research employs a qualitative approach through document analysis of LPBKI MUI's official publications and academic literature on religious authority and communication gatekeeping theory. Drawing on Max Weber's typology of authority, this study finds that LPBKI MUI's legitimacy is built through a combination of traditional authority rooted in the scholarly lineage of its verifiers, legal-rational authority grounded in its institutional structure and the legal basis of Law Number 3 of 2017, and a collective charismatic authority attached to the ulama figures within its board of advisors. Within the gatekeeping theory framework, LPBKI MUI applies four content-filtering standards: basic Islamic standards, Islamic-and-national-outlook standards, statutory regulation standards, and technical-linguistic standards. The study further finds that LPBKI's gatekeeping model remains manual and pre-publication in nature, in contrast to the real-time, post-publication character of digital information flows, leaving structural limitations in keeping pace with the continuously growing volume of content. This study recommends developing a validation mechanism that is more adaptive to the speed of the digital ecosystem without diminishing the scholarly-authority framework underlying its legitimacy.
Co-Authors Daud Rasyid Indriya Marhadi Muhayar Maulavi Nawwaf Ubada Muhibuddin Siti Nuri Nurhaidah