Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Analisis Proporsionalitas Sanksi Pemecatan ASN Atas Pelanggaran Disiplin Moral Kasus Perselingkuhan di Kota Palembang Aprilia, Mersi; Radiandro, Buchari; Gudangga, Qyan Hari Simartla; Madinar
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.253

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis proporsionalitas sanksi pemecatan Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) atas pelanggaran disiplin moral di lingkungan Pemerintah Kota Palembang tahun 2025. Pemecatan merupakan sanksi disiplin paling berat dalam sistem kepegawaian ASN yang hanya dapat dijatuhkan terhadap pelanggaran berat sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 94 Tahun 2021 tentang Disiplin PNS. Dalam penerapannya, sanksi tersebut harus memenuhi prinsip proporsionalitas, yaitu adanya keseimbangan antara tingkat kesalahan, dampak pelanggaran, serta prosedur penegakan disiplin yang adil dan transparan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus Perselingkuhan terhadap kasus pemecatan ASN akibat pelanggaran disiplin moral di lingkungan Pemkot Palembang. Analisis dilakukan dengan menilai kesesuaian antara jenis pelanggaran, tingkat kesalahan, prosedur pemeriksaan, dan sanksi yang dijatuhkan berdasarkan prinsip proporsionalitas serta asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar kasus telah memenuhi prinsip proporsionalitas karena pelanggaran yang dilakukan tergolong berat dan berdampak pada integritas serta kepercayaan publik. Namun demikian, ditemukan pula indikasi ketidakkonsistenan dalam penerapan sanksi pada beberapa kasus tertentu. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan standarisasi pedoman penjatuhan sanksi disiplin dan penguatan mekanisme pengawasan guna menjamin keadilan, kepastian hukum, serta perlindungan hak ASN dalam proses penegakan disiplin.
Perlindungan konsuler warga negara ganda dalam konflik bersenjata fitra yamazaki, Muhammad Adrian; kurniawan, Aldo; Gudangga, Qyan Hari Simartla; Jovinka, Fadel
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Consular protection for dual nationals during armed conflict remains an inadequately addressed gap in international law. This study attempts to examine how the international legal framework regulates consular protection for dual nationals during armed conflict, while also mapping the various obstacles that arise in its implementation in the field. To address this issue, this study uses a normative legal research method by combining legislative, conceptual, and case studies, sourced from a literature review of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results of the study found that the legal basis for consular protection is essentially based on the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations and the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, but neither instrument specifically addresses the issue of dual nationality. Consequently, the determination of which country is entitled to provide protection is left to the principle of effective nationality, which in practice is often applied inconsistently. This complexity is further compounded during armed conflict, as access for consular officials is limited, diplomatic relations can be disrupted, and administrative procedures become cumbersome. The 1949 Geneva Conventions do provide minimum protection through international humanitarian law, but they cannot completely replace consular protection. The case of Aiden Aslin in 2022 illustrates how the ambiguity of dual citizenship can lead to the loss of effective access to consular protection in conflict zones.
Implementasi Prinsip Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Perjanjian Internasional Menurut Konvensi Wina 1969 Gudangga, Qyan Hari Simartla; Zhafira, Thalitha Olga; Hati, Diana Permata
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 3 (2026): April - Juni
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

International treaties are important legal instruments in regulating relations and cooperation among states, therefore their implementation must be based on clear and binding legal principles. One of the fundamental principles in the law of treaties is pacta sunt servanda, which affirms that every treaty in force is binding upon the parties and must be performed in good faith as stipulated in Article 26 of the 1969 Vienna Convention. This study uses a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, conducted through library research on the 1969 Vienna Convention, books, journals, and other relevant legal literature. The discussion focuses on the regulation of the pacta sunt servanda principle under the 1969 Vienna Convention and its implementation in the practice of international treaties. The study finds that pacta sunt servanda constitutes the main basis that gives binding force to international treaties and obliges states to perform treaty provisions in good faith, while also preventing states from invoking national law as a justification for failing to carry out treaty obligations as emphasized in Article 27 of the 1969 Vienna Convention.