<![CDATA[The main problem in this research is the fulfillment of post-divorce women's rights that have not been fully fulfilled. For this reason, this research aims to analyze the fulfillment of women's rights after the divorce lawsuit in terms of the implementation of SEMA No. 2 of 2019 at the Sungguminasa Religious Court Class IB Kab. Gowa. This research uses normative research supported by empirical research and describes the results of research with qualitative methods in collecting data using descriptive qualitative methods, namely collecting data from respondents. Data collection methods are observation, interviews and documentation methods. The data analysis technique used in this study is a qualitative descriptive analysis technique. Based on the results of this study indicate that the implementation of SEMA No. 2 of 2019 as an effort for women to guarantee their rights after a divorce lawsuit has not been effective in its implementation at the Sungguminasa Religious Court. Implementation of SEMA No. 2 of 2019 at the Sungguminasa Religious Court still encounters many obstacles. The inhibiting factors are: 1) The absence of one of the parties in the trial so that the judge cannot dig up the facts; 2) The wife (plaintiff) cannot provide proof of income/salary slip of the husband (defendant) as a reference for the judge in determining the husband's ability; 3) There is still a lack of public knowledge of the SEMA.]]>
Copyrights © 2024
